1
'He and Fozzie are finding their feet': Barrett sheds light on All Blacks' attack
Ahead of the All Blacks‘ clash with Los Pumas over the weekend, New Zealand began operating with their third attack coach of the season – and things didn’t quite go to plan in Christchurch, with NZ retaining plenty of ball but struggling to penetrate the Argentinian defence.
ADVERTISEMENT
John Plumtree began the season as the man in charge of the All Blacks’ attack but was let go ahead of the team’s trip to South Africa, with head coach Ian Foster temporarily taking over in the Republic. After the two-game series was out of the way, Joe Schmidt was officially brought on as attack coach after previously working in a smaller role for New Zealand throughout the formative stages of the season.
With Schmidt in charge for Saturday’s 25-18 defeat, the All Blacks adopted a considerably flatter structure in the backline while the one-off runners the team employed throughout their time in South Africa also became more prominent.
Despite dominating possession, finishing the match with 61 per cent in their favour, NZ could only put together two tries – one from a lineout maul and one a counter-attack from an Argentinian lineout gone wrong.
Speaking to media this week, playmaker Beauden Barrett, who was absent from the match, indicated that it was taking time to bed in Schmidt’s new systems – similar systems to the ones that Schmidt utilised throughout his tenure as head coach of the Irish national side.
“It’s all on building good habits and doing it all the time rather than sometimes,” Barrett said of where the team is still trying to get things right. “I think Joe’s been really good in that space and there’s no doubt he and Fozzie are finding their feet in how they’re going to run things but I think Joe’s been awesome and so has Fozzie so I think we’ll see the fruits off that hopefully this weekend and games to come.”
“That’s kind of where I’m going with the good habits and doing it every time,” he said when asked about Schmidt’s Ireland, who operated with minimal mistakes throughout repeated phases to break down opposition. “They’re machines, they run around like robots, they’re very efficient – with all due respect. They know how to retain ball and they do it very effectively.
ADVERTISEMENT
“We don’t want to be like other teams; we need to be the best team we can be. There’s no doubt there’ll be a little bit of that showing through in weeks to come but we’ve still got to be the expressive All Blacks that we know we can be.”
Barrett also suggested that some of that expressiveness will perhaps need to take a backseat, however, if the All Blacks want to compete with the best of the best week-in and week-out.
“When the pressure comes on, naturally we want to run the ball and keep it in hand,” he said. “It just feels so natural to us and we’ve identified that in games that we’ve lost, perhaps, we may need to kick the ball a little bit more.
“It seems unnatural but it’s just being aware of that and then looking to attack in different ways: everyone on our feet, chasing kicks, getting those 50/50 bounces or flooding rucks and looking for turnovers that way. It’s what other teams do really well, particularly South Africa, play a low-risk gameplan and then put the ball into the air and look to feed off those errors.
ADVERTISEMENT
“It goes back to the point of what does building pressure look like?” Barrett added. “It’s not necessarily holding onto the ball and building phases, it’s how we use the ball – kicking and it’s the game management and it’s a collective team focus. It’s not just on the 9s and 10s, it’s everyone, everyone’s got to be looking at that space. It’s been at the forefront of our minds in the last few days and we’ve seen some good shifts already this week.
“Again, we’re not going to be like any other team, we’ve just got to figure out – and we are figuring out – the way that we want to play.”
This weekend, the All Blacks have the opportunity to avenge their loss from Saturday and will once again square off with Los Pumas – this time in Hamilton.
I get that things are changing with Schmidt on board, but the idea that Foster is finding his feet is disturbing. He’s been with the team since 2012, has he never implemented new ideas in that whole time?? I’m also disappointed to hear players start using the same corporate psychobabble the coach likes to use , talking about “spaces” like rugby is a market segment meeting. Between that and the repeated phrase “we didn’t get what we want” the vagueness on the field is reflected in the language they are using. I’d like to hear just one of them say “we played poorly”.