Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He doesn't look out of place': Ian Foster's rave review for two of New Zealand's newest All Blacks

(Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

There’s no doubting the All Blacks‘ 27-7 victory over the Wallabies in Auckland on Sunday was crucial in the grand scheme of the Bledisloe Cup series as the Kiwis aim to retain the coveted silverware for the 18th year running.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a match of particular significance for two members of Ian Foster’s squad, though, with previously uncapped duo Peter Umaga-Jensen and Alex Hodgman both making their test debuts off the bench.

Coming on in place of the blood-binned Anton Lienert-Brown midway through the opening stanza, Umaga-Jensen enjoyed two cameo appearances in either half before being forced from the field himself with a head knock.

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup II | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup II | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Hodgman was also thrust into the action earlier than anticipated after incumbent All Blacks prop Joe Moody was taken from the field with a head injury of his own with about 10 minutes to play in the first half.

Both players accustomed themselves upon their introductions into international rugby, with Umaga-Jensen making a notable line break in the second half, while Hodgman proved a strong addition to the All Blacks both at the set piece and in general play.

That led All Blacks head coach Ian Foster to lather the duo in praise following his side’s win at Eden Park, making particular note of Umaga-Jensen’s efforts at late notice after he was called into the squad as an injury replacement to Rieko Ioane.

“Big wrap out here for Peter Umaga-Jensen,” Foster told reporters of the 22-year-old shortly after full-time.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He’s been with us for a couple of weeks, earlier in the week, and then we sent him back to the Mitre 10 [Cup], and then he’s called in late.

“It’s disappointing he had to go off with a knock, but he doesn’t look out of place, so there’s some nice signs there.”

As for Hodgman, Foster was impressed with the way in which the 27-year-old handled the rigours of international rugby in front of his home crowd.

“I was thrilled for him. He went on early, and to go into a test of that sort of magnitude on your home ground, in front of your family, and then to play the way he played, it was exciting,” Foster said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He should be really proud of it. He didn’t shirk away from anything, he got involved in that attack and the defence side of the game, and sometimes your first test can run by you pretty quickly, but he should be immensely proud of what he did.”

Hodgman, a former Fiji and New Zealand U20 representative who started his professional career with Canterbury and the Crusaders before moving north three years ago, took a more mindful view about the way his first cap came about.

“I guess my debut came at a cost for our team. I feel sorry for Joe Moody, it was unfortunate what happened. I was quite nervous seeing him go down. I just wish his family [well], and he’s going all good,” Hodgman said.

He was, however, proud of his achievement, attributing the milestone to his family and teammates.

“For myself, I’m a product of my environment. I felt my family, I felt my support, I felt these guys next to me and the boys in the changing room.

“I wouldn’t have been as confident going out there [without them], and I think with their support, they made it so much more easier to do my job.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search