Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He doesn't look out of place': Ian Foster's rave review for two of New Zealand's newest All Blacks

(Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

There’s no doubting the All Blacks‘ 27-7 victory over the Wallabies in Auckland on Sunday was crucial in the grand scheme of the Bledisloe Cup series as the Kiwis aim to retain the coveted silverware for the 18th year running.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a match of particular significance for two members of Ian Foster’s squad, though, with previously uncapped duo Peter Umaga-Jensen and Alex Hodgman both making their test debuts off the bench.

Coming on in place of the blood-binned Anton Lienert-Brown midway through the opening stanza, Umaga-Jensen enjoyed two cameo appearances in either half before being forced from the field himself with a head knock.

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup II | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup II | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Hodgman was also thrust into the action earlier than anticipated after incumbent All Blacks prop Joe Moody was taken from the field with a head injury of his own with about 10 minutes to play in the first half.

Both players accustomed themselves upon their introductions into international rugby, with Umaga-Jensen making a notable line break in the second half, while Hodgman proved a strong addition to the All Blacks both at the set piece and in general play.

That led All Blacks head coach Ian Foster to lather the duo in praise following his side’s win at Eden Park, making particular note of Umaga-Jensen’s efforts at late notice after he was called into the squad as an injury replacement to Rieko Ioane.

“Big wrap out here for Peter Umaga-Jensen,” Foster told reporters of the 22-year-old shortly after full-time.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He’s been with us for a couple of weeks, earlier in the week, and then we sent him back to the Mitre 10 [Cup], and then he’s called in late.

“It’s disappointing he had to go off with a knock, but he doesn’t look out of place, so there’s some nice signs there.”

As for Hodgman, Foster was impressed with the way in which the 27-year-old handled the rigours of international rugby in front of his home crowd.

“I was thrilled for him. He went on early, and to go into a test of that sort of magnitude on your home ground, in front of your family, and then to play the way he played, it was exciting,” Foster said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He should be really proud of it. He didn’t shirk away from anything, he got involved in that attack and the defence side of the game, and sometimes your first test can run by you pretty quickly, but he should be immensely proud of what he did.”

Hodgman, a former Fiji and New Zealand U20 representative who started his professional career with Canterbury and the Crusaders before moving north three years ago, took a more mindful view about the way his first cap came about.

“I guess my debut came at a cost for our team. I feel sorry for Joe Moody, it was unfortunate what happened. I was quite nervous seeing him go down. I just wish his family [well], and he’s going all good,” Hodgman said.

He was, however, proud of his achievement, attributing the milestone to his family and teammates.

“For myself, I’m a product of my environment. I felt my family, I felt my support, I felt these guys next to me and the boys in the changing room.

“I wouldn’t have been as confident going out there [without them], and I think with their support, they made it so much more easier to do my job.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall' 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall'
Search