Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He has to go' former Wallaby great calls time on Cheika

Michael Cheika (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Former Wallaby great Matt Burke is not afraid of re-affirming his position on Michael Cheika publicly. Speaking on the Big Sports Breakfast Radio Show, Burke called for Cheika’s sacking once again.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Michael Cheika, after that season, has to go,” he said.

“It has been so poor from the Wallabies’ perspective. There has to be a change.

“I don’t think just getting rid of the assistant coaches will be enough. I think they have to change it from the top down.

Burke believed it was a case of doing something is better than doing nothing, with long-term damage to the Wallabies brand at risk if they become used to losing.

“The rugby brand itself is struggling. And the more they take the field and they are losing and the way they are losing, the brand is being damaged incredibly.

“If you were talking in a business sense and a CEO was performing like that he would be outed immediately.

Rugby Australia Chairman Cameron Clyne delivered an absurd 45-second press conference on Monday following the December Board meeting which failed to address Cheika’s future.

He refused to take questions and claiming a thorough review will be ‘done by Christmas’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cheika received the backing of Clyne and CEO Raelene Castle prior to the November European tour where Castle claimed three wins from the three tests would be considered a pass mark.

“They are determined to go there and win all three games. That’s the start point, the pass mark from their perspective, that’s the expectation that Michael’s setting for them,” she said.

“There’s no reason they can’t do that. They would be very confident that they can come home with three wins.”

They managed just one victory against Italy, winning in a scrappy affair 26-7. They lost to Wales and England to cement one of the worst seasons on record for the Wallabies with just four test wins from 13 matches.

ADVERTISEMENT

Burke took aim at a ‘dithering’ and ‘floundering’ administration that seems incapable of delivering certainty either way.

“They are dithering,” he said.

“They are floundering on the field and they are floundering off the field.

“We are floundering at the moment, treading water until we get an outcome and that outcome is very uncertain.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Lions Share | Episode 4

South Africa v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

France v New Zealand | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

England v Wales | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Lions Share | Episode 3

Zimbabwe vs Kenya | Rugby Africa Cup Semi Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Spain | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Portugal vs Ireland | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 10 minutes ago
Springboks' No.1 status in world rankings coming under increased threat

“It was in a time where the divide between teams and quality may as well have been from different universes. Now, the teams are closer than they ever was. It's not that NZ have become worse, it's just that others caught up. Few teams would be able to break those records if ever. Not even NZ themselves will be able to ever break those records. It is an interesting record, yet no one talks about it.”

Agree.


“Despite such dominant performances, they could only manage 3 WC trophies during that time, so actually just a success rate of 33,3%.”

No, in the time that the world rankings have existed there have only been 6 WCs, and NZ have only won 2. In the time NZ were dominating the world rankings there were 2 WCs, and NZ won them both.


“That dominance was basically nullified in a sense. What would you have? The records for the most weeks at 1 when most other teams were very weak? Or would you prefer having the most WC's? Which is more important? The record of weeks at number 1? Or the most WC trophies ever? The title as the Kings of knockout rugby? Records doesn't bring titles.”

I’d much rather have the record for most weeks at #1. Not because the rankings matter in and of themselves, but because the rankings are a good indication of how much a team wins. World cups are the most important competition, hence why they are weighted more heavily in the rankings and winning the world cup always results in being ranked first. But other competitions matter too. NZ were so dominant in the world rankings because they won the world cup, and the rugby championship nearly every year, and won the vast majority of their tours. SA have been #1 less than NZ because even though they have won more WCs, they have been much less successful in all other matches and competitions. 2024 is the first time since the 90s that SA were the best in the world during a non-world cup year. As an England fan, I like it when England win, and I don’t like it when England lose. I care more about the WC than other matches, but ultimately I would rather England win consistently than somehow win regular world cups without winning anything in between.


Something you need to bear in mind is that during the time that NZ were dominant in the rankings, “the divide between teams and quality may as well have been from different universes” - and that includes SA. Being an SA fan must be like heaven now - but the WC titles don’t take away how bad things were from 2010-2018.

111 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Hugo Keenan: 'Last man standing, safe pair of hands or world-class operator?' Hugo Keenan: 'Last man standing, safe pair of hands or world-class operator?'