Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He said 20 per cent and I said, Wow' - Lam reacts to Sinckler's Bristol 'struggle' claim

(Photo by INPHO via EPCR)

Pat Lam has reacted to the claim by Kyle Sinckler that he has only been “functioning at 20 per cent of my best at Bristol” since his summer Gallagher Premiership move away from Harlequins. Currently in England camp, the tighthead explained that settling in had been difficult as he was unable to see his family and was restricted in getting to know his new surroundings due to the lockdown.  

ADVERTISEMENT

“I guess for me, my issues have been I had to move in the middle of lockdown and I haven’t seen my mum since June. I haven’t seen any family,” said Sinckler about Bristol at the start of the week. “I’ve been in Bristol and basically we have been on our own little lockdown because you can’t go out – if you get coronavirus and bring it back to the team that is not going to be good.

It’s just been a big change and I appreciate everyone there that has been massively patient with me. I’m just excited to get back some form (with England) and then when I get back to Bristol, whenever that may be, I want to try and do the fans proud.

Video Spacer

Dylan Hartley and Ryan Wilson reflect on England’s win over Ireland

Video Spacer

Dylan Hartley and Ryan Wilson reflect on England’s win over Ireland

“I’ve gone to Bristol and it’s like starting again from zero. I can only give thanks to Pat Lam and the coaches that have massively helped me.”

Lam has now reacted to the Sinckler revelation, suggesting it was positive that the prop had still been so influential at Bristol despite only operating at limited capacity. “That’s pretty exciting because I have been pretty happy with what he has done,” said the Bears coach on Wednesday.

“I know that he could be better but he said 20 per cent and I said, ‘Wow’. Kyle is great. I’m really pleased for him. He has fitted in so well here, he’s a great guy and the guys love him here too. He’s been great. He has been getting better and better as he goes, in international rugby as well. He came through and started the (Challenge Cup) final for us and was superb. But that is Kyle. He knows he is always pushing. He’s such a quality professional. 

“Every part of his game he is trying to improve on and off the field, it’s all about getting better. It always is tough for people (moving). Well, covid has been tough for everybody but certainly changing and transition, I’m just glad that he is enjoying himself here and I’m also pleased that he feels he can get better. But in reality, it doesn’t surprise me because that is Kyle, he always wants to get better every day.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It was unusual for a player to be so publicly candid about what they felt was a shortcoming, but Lam has taken great encouragement from Sinckler’s confidence to speak out about his settling-in issues, hoping it can prompt other players at the club and elsewhere to go and seek help whenever they are having any kind of problem rather than bottle it up and struggle even more. 

“No rugby player is the same, no person is the same,” continued Lam. “The most important thing is we talk about self-awareness. Great teams have players who are self-aware, they acknowledge the good things but more importantly, they realise I need to better here so I need some help, whether that is on the field or off.

“The other thing that is really important is (being) socially aware. We are not all from Bristol, we’re not all from England, we’re not all white, we’re not all black, we’re not all brown. We are all individuals and as I said to the boys what we are living here, we are a great example of how the world can be a better place.

“I have said look at all the backgrounds we have here, look at all the different educations that people have had, no one really cares because ultimately it is about respecting, appreciating and valuing everyone and I love it. No individual will truly be their best if they don’t feel they belong. That is a big part of what we do because the boys won’t be able to play the way they do and more importantly we can’t be honest (if they can’t be themselves). 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Because it was pretty honest in the review session yesterday (Tuesday, after Sunday’s loss at Wasps). I came pretty hard at some players. They knew I was going to come but also before I did that I acknowledged all the unbelievable good work that we did in that Wasps game and then I came hard because you’re not going to learn if I’m not honest with them.”

  • Watch the Gallagher Premiership on BT Sport. Click here to buy now

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 15 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search