Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He was the best there's been': Richie McCaw rates the Wallabies' openside flankers he played against

By Ben Smith
Richie McCaw of the All Blacks and David Pocock of the Wallabies run off for half time during the Tri-Nations Bledisloe Cup match between the New Zealand All Blacks and the Australian Wallabies at Eden Park on August 6, 2011 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Former All Blacks captain and openside flanker Richie McCaw has opened up on the Australian opposites he faced during his storied career in Bledisloe battles.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 148-Test veteran faced the Wallabies at the peak of their powers in the early stage of his career, coming up against the likes of George Smith at a time when they held the Bledisloe Cup.

After his debut in 2001 on the end of year tour, McCaw was a part of the 2002 All Blacks side that lost to the Wallabies on a late penalty goal by Matt Burke which levelled the series 1-all.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

As his career moved on, McCaw faced a number of opensides including Phil Waugh, Michael Hooper and David Pocock.

“You got to play against them fairly regularly and absolutely understood what you were up against,” McCaw told The All Blacks podcast.

“A guy like a George Smith, I first played, I think it was U19s, and I didn’t know he was, but I remember thinking after the game ‘Man, that guy knows what he’s doing’.

“And then it was that next year, he was playing for the Brumbies and played against the British & Irish Lions, a year later. He was a smart footballer, like he knew where to be and how to have an impact fairly regularly. And you had to be aware of what he could do. We had some good battles over the years, for a long time with him.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Then there was this Phil Waugh who was a slightly different player, but more confrontational. But, again, you knew what you’re going to get there.If you were a bit slow to the first phase break down, or whatever, they’d get in there and disrupt it. So you’d be pretty aware of that.”

McCaw had high praise for David Pocock who debuted in 2008 and played either at No 7 or No 8 throughout the rest of his career.

He said Pocock was “the best there’s been” over the ball at the breakdown and “impossible to move”.

“Then the latter years, David Pocock was, he was the best there’s been, probably still has been, able to contest the ball on the ground,” McCaw said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And if you gave him even just a split second to get in there, he was almost impossible to move.

“And we did spend a bit of time on how do you limit his his ability to influence those sort of things? And to answer your question, you certainly knew who you were up against, and had to.

“But you didn’t want to get so focused on opposition player because if your whole team’s on top, you know, it limits their influence like that.

“But there’s a few little things that you had to just be aware of that, they can make the day, make your team’s day, a lot harder.”

Enter now to stand a chance of winning tickets to all three British & Irish Lions Tests vs Australia
You can also enter our ticket giveaway to win tickets to watch them take on Argentina in Dublin for the first time ever!

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GS 1 hour ago
Bundee Aki sends new reminder to All Blacks he's the one that got away

It's good to see, as I expected, that you are inherently dishonest and won't answer three simple questions.


Your reflex is to react with abuse and vulgarity, highlighting your position's inherent weakness and ignorance. So feel free to abuse me all day because it does not take away the accuracy of my questions.


By refusing to address the questions and then answering with abuse, you confirm that they are accurate and truthful.


Again, refusing to answer the question allows you to avoid the fact that Ireland effectively brought its way to success, as everyone in the Southern Hemisphere understands.


I mean, the sad, simple fact is that in the recent QF loss to the ABs - Ireland scored one try, and all others were scored by Kiwis - including two by so-called "project players."


The amusing thing is—and I'm unsure if you realize how funny it is—when rolling out the abuse to all things Kiwi and Kiwi rugby, you are so blinded by your abuse that you haven't taken time to consider that you have multiple Kiwis running around in your national team and that your team's success is largely built off the Rugby IP of a Kiwi coach. I mean, a little self-reflection might assist here, I would imagine.


As I leave, let me leave you again with those three questions and the simple challenge of answering them: Are you honest enough to do so, or will you reply with abuse?


Agree or disagree:

1. The IRFU enacted a policy of "Project Players."

2. The policy targeted professional rugby players who they considered could, after the residency three-year residency period in existence at that time(now five years), play for Ireland.

3. None of the Southern Unions - RA, NZRFU, etc- have ever enacted any centralized policy and have ever had any "project player."

97 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Can Toulouse winning machine Ugo Mola undo England's straitjacket? Can Toulouse winning machine Ugo Mola undo England's straitjacket?
Search