Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Heaviest players at 2019 Rugby World Cup revealed

Ben Tameifuna. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

By Luke Kirkness, NZ Herald

When it comes to tipping the scales, no one in World Rugby comes close to Ben Tameifuna.

The Tongan tighthead prop, known for his barnstorming runs and back-breaking tackles, listed a whopping 153kg playing weight in the Rugby World Cup statistics.

Some distance behind Tameifuna in second was former Sacred Heart College student and current Wallabies prop, Taniela “Tongan Thor” Tupou at 135kg.

And while Tonga was still searching for its first 2019 Rugby World Cup win, they could take pride in two other victories.

The small island nation, ranked 16th in the world, boasts the heaviest player and heaviest forward pack at the World Cup.

Continue reading below…

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer

The average weight for a member in Tonga’s forward pack was 118.53kg, according to Weight Watchers Australia which crunched the numbers.

Uruguay had the lightest World Cup forward pack, who were on average 13kg lighter than the Tongan’s at 104.81kg.

New Zealand’s average was 113.76kg and the overall World Cup average forward weighing 112kg.

The body mass index for many of the forwards in Japan would be considered unhealthy, according to body mass index calculations.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1178816072654278656

However, BMI’s weren’t always accurate when it came to professional athletes.

It didn’t distinguish between fat and muscle, so those with large muscle masses often had high BMI, even though their body fat was in the healthy range.

Those with weight around their waist and healthy BMIs at the highest risk of death from any cause, compared to those with higher BMIs and weight elsewhere.

“If I had to choose between making sure my BMI or my waist-to-hip ratio are within the ‘normal’ range, I would go for the latter,” University of Sydney associate professor Emmanuel Stamatkis said.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1178781269053722624

“A high waist-to-hip ratio most likely means high amounts of abdominal fat, and we know this comes with quite serious health risks.”

New Zealand’s heaviest player was Ofa Tu’ungafasi at 129kg, closely followed by Atu Moli at 127kg and Angus Ta’avo at 124kg.

Ardie Savea punches well above his weight of 95kg, the lightest member of New Zealand’s forward pack and the only one under 100kg.

But the lightest forward in the competition was Kwagga Smith, from South Africa, who weighed a relatively small 80kg.

This article first appeared on nzherald.co.nz and was republished with permission.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 28 minutes ago
Let's be real about these All Blacks

I didn't really get the should tone from it, but maybe because I was just reading it as my own thoughts.


What I read it as was examples of how they played well enough in every game to be able to win it.


Yeah I dunno if Ben wouldn't see it that way (someone else would for sure need to point it out to him though), I'm more in the Ben not appreciating that those close losses werent one off scenarios camp. Sure you can look at dubious decisions causing them to have to play with 14 or 13 men at the death as viable reasons but even in the games they won without such difficulties they made a real struggle of it (compared to how good some of their first half play was). This kind of article where you trying to point out the 3 losses really would most likely have been wins only really makes sense/works when your other performances make those 3 games (or endings) stand out.


There might have been a sentence here and there to ensure some good comment numbers but when he's signing off the article by saying things like ..

Whilst these All Blacks aren’t blowing teams off the park like during the 2010s, they are nuggety and resourceful and don’t wilt. They are prepared to win the hard way, accumulating points by any means necessary.

and..

The other top sides in the world struggled to put them away. France and South Africa both could have well been defeated on home soil.

I don't really see it. Always making sure people are upto date with the SH standing/perspective! NZ went through some tough times with so many different perspectives and reasons why, but then it was.. amusing how.. behind everyone was once they turned a corner. More of these 'unfortunate' results returned against SA and France at the start of the RWC which made it extra tasty to catch other teams out when they did bring it. So that created some 'conscious' perspective that I just kept going and sharing re thoughts on similar predicaments of other teams, I had been really confident that Wallabies displays vs NZ were real, that the Argentines can backup their thing against Aus and SA (and so obviously the rest), and current one is that England are actually consistent and improving with their attack (which everyone should get onboard with), and I'm expecting a more dominant display against Japan (even though they should have more of their experienced internationals for this one) that highlights further growth from July. 👍

57 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search