Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He'll be loving it': Pumas coach Cheika on Ian Foster's 'tough' position

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Argentina’s new head coach Michael Cheika has weighed in on Ian Foster’s ‘tough’ position with the All Blacks with an interesting perspective.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joining Sky Sport NZ’s The Breakdown ahead of Los Pumas test with the All Blacks in Christchurch, Cheika said that Foster should be ‘loving’ his position as head coach.

He explained that being in charge of a country like New Zealand with the resources at their disposal is a privilege that any coach would enjoy.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“It’s not work at all, he’s the coach of New Zealand, one of the best countries in the world at rugby,” Cheika told The Breakdown panel.

“He’ll be loving it, even when it’s tough mate, it doesn’t matter. That comes with the territory of footy. It gets tough.

“It’s a brilliant position to have, it’s a great honor if you are in it, and you love it, you get to go out and be involved in footy every day.

“It doesn’t matter how tough it gets, it’s part of the game, just like when you were a player.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The former Wallabies head coach knows about coming under pressure as his Australian team went through a lean run of results following the 2015 Rugby World Cup final appearance.

Cheika maintained his position as head coach through to the 2019 Rugby World Cup but was let go after the quarter-final loss to England.

Joining Los Pumas staff in 2020, he was elevated to head coach of Argentina after Mario Ledesma called it quits after a tough 2021 season.

Cheika’s Pumas bounced back last week to beat the Wallabies 48-17 in a reversal of the first test between the sides.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The first test was very disappointing actually, we were in a good position to win that,” the Pumas head coach said.

“In the back end, we gave away seven penalties in six minutes or something like that.

“There has been a lot of changes around the style, with different coaching team, it’s a different style we are looking to play.

“The more you get to use that, not just at training but in live game situations, and it works for you, and they click, they start to believe in things a bit more.

“Which is a process longer term. We did make a few small changes tactically [for the second test] but it was more about believing in what we are up to.

Former Argentina flyhalf Felipe Contepomi has joined the coaching staff which has helped Cheika translate as they bring a new style of play to the Pumas.

The two have a working history dating back to their time at Leinster where Contepomi played for several seasons up to 2009.

“He’s a different man as a coach than as a player. He’s become a lot more measured,” Cheika said of his assistant.

“The fire that he shows has been channeled internally and he’s obviously got great experience with Leinster, coaching there, learning a lot from the great coaches they’ve had there.

“I think he brings a lot of things I remember from way back when we went there [Leinster] originally.

“A lot of those attacking principles, a lot of detail around the preparation, and we’re coaching a little bit different here.

“Everyone is taking a bit of a role in everything.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
k
karin 850 days ago

Kia kaha

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search