Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Henry and Hansen aligned on Super Rugby draft and trades

Graham Henry

The Super Rugby Commission promises to add flavour to what has become a lopsided competition and proposed changes now have the backing of two of the world’s great rugby minds.

ADVERTISEMENT

This week, sporting headlines have been grabbed by a 19-year-old by the name of Victor Webanyama, a young Frenchman who has been referred to as “maybe the greatest prospect in the history of team sports”, and is preparing to be drafted with the number one pick in Friday’s NBA draft.

The hype across the basketball community is fierce and along with the ongoing trade season, has kept interest very much alive and thriving despite this being the offseason.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Super Rugby has the opportunity to replicate that sort of engagement, with the addition of similar innovations which would also – and perhaps more importantly – add to the competitive value of the competition.

“We’ve had some great games,” Sir Graham Henry told Stuff’s Newsable podcast, discussing the Super Rugby Pacific season. “We’ve had some mismatches as well.

“I see New Zealand and Australian rugby are looking at having a separate organisation to run Super Rugby and have a draft system. I think having even teams is really important and some of the teams haven’t been that competitive because they simply haven’t got the players to be competitive.

“So I think that’s a good step in the right direction, going forward.”

Related

Sir Graham Henry and Sir Steve Hansen have both joined the podcast in the past week and voiced their approval of a draft system and even the ability to trade players. Hansen’s views were summarized when he said: “The Super competition comes under a lot of scrutiny, and there are some good ideas coming out of Australia about how to jazz it up a bit. Hopefully, we are open and flexible enough in our thinking to maybe try that.”

Eligibility laws would have to be amended to accommodate players being drafted and/or traded between the Super Rugby clubs, an adjustment both coaches see as worthwhile.

“I think there should be a trading system,” Henry continued. “To make sure the sides are reasonably even.

“If you look at the contract finance for each team there’s quite a big difference between, say, the Crusaders and the Highlanders.

“That reflects the quality of the two sides – so having equal finance for each team going forward so that results in a pretty even competition I think would be a positive thing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
C
Christ 548 days ago

the title of the article is misleading. all i'm reading is Henry viewpoints. where is Hansen viewpoints?

O
Otagoman II 548 days ago

I'm curious about the point about equal finance between the sides. Is it a significant difference?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search