Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He's going through a legal process at the minute... I hope he gets everything he is owed'

(Photo by Bob Bradford - CameraSport via Getty Images)

It’s nearly two weeks now since the latest off-field drama unfolded at struggling Leicester, Geordan Murphy stepping away from his director of rugby role at the Premiership club following 23 years of service that began as a player in the late 1990s. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Irishman, who joined as a trialist in 1997 before working his way up the playing ranks, had become director of rugby in July with the arrival of Steve Borthwick to inherit the head coach position Murphy had filled since the 2018 sacking of Matt O’Connor. 

Leicester’s form under Borthwick in the restarted 2019/20 Premiership wasn’t good results-wise, Tigers only winning two of their nine matches. However, they started the new 2020/21 season with a home win last Saturday over Gloucester.

Video Spacer

Will the All Blacks finish with a win next Saturday?

Video Spacer

Will the All Blacks finish with a win next Saturday?

That positive first outing without Murphy having any involvement at the club for the first time in 23 years didn’t stop The Rugby Pod from expressing its sadness that Leicester have cut ties with a loyal servant.   

Andy Goode, the ex-Leicester out-half who hosts the show with Jim Hamilton, another former Tiger, wants the situation to now get settled amicably with the club paying up what Murphy is due on his contract rather than haggling about the situation.    

Speaking about the sudden November 13 departure of Murphy from Leicester, Goode said: “It boils down to the fact that Geordan’s contract was coming up at the end of the season and he was waiting for a conversation. He said, ‘Listen, contract is up at the end of the year, what’s happening? What are your plans? Am I involved long term? Steve Borthwick has come in. 

“There has been huge changes at that club. The CEO has changed, Simon Cohen has left. There is big changes on the board. We saw Rory Underwood leave a few weeks ago as well. Geordan asked the question and in reality they have said to him, ‘We’re not looking to extend your contract’. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Geordan has put 23 years of unbelievable service into that club be it as a player, as a kid coming through to captain it, winning all the trophies that he did, and then moving into the coaching department and earning his stripes there. He called himself a professional cone collector to start off with but he learned and built to eventually be the guy that took over as director of rugby and it’s tough on him. 

“Let’s not put all of the issues Leicester have had at Geordan’s door because I don’t think many of them could be attributed to him. A lot of it has been the recruitment, the quality of player that has left and not been replaced and where they have gone with their recruitment. That wasn’t anything to do with Geordan.

“I’m speaking as a very good mate so obviously I’m going to defend him slightly. but when you asked a question, which he did, about extending his contract and the club say we are in tough financial times as well, do they want a director of rugby and a head coach at the club, both earning good wages? Well, you have seen the answer so they are not going to extend it and they agreed to part company. 

“It’s a real shame for Geordan that he doesn’t get some sort of send off but once they made that decision as a club to say, look we’re not going to extend your contract, what impact could he have on the club this year when everyone that is making those decisions probably knew that anything he said wouldn’t have a long lasting weight behind it because they are seeing he is leaving. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a massive shame. I think he is going through a legal process at the minute, how much he gets paid out. I hope he gets everything he is owed because that would be the only way of kind of thanking him for the 23 years of service. He has got a contract, a year left – don’t negotiate Leicester, just pay him what he is owed for that, shake hands and you walk away. 

“We saw Cockers [Richard Cockerill] did a wonderful job at Leicester but he left. There is a lot of people who have worked tirelessly at that club, loved that club, but sometimes you need a change and Geordan will be the first to admit that his tenure as director of rugby and head coach had been difficult where they finished in the league. 

“I don’t hold him responsible for a lot of that because the players he has had were as good as what he had and that’s why they finished where they did in the league (eleventh two seasons in succession).”

Hamilton added: “That is the hardest thing about it, his legacy. As a player he is one of the best in the northern hemisphere that we have ever seen… he’s such a legend for Leicester. The club has just been on the decline and he has been picking up the pieces for year on year on year. It’s sad he is gone.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 26 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search