Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He's going to have to change': Mitre 10 Cup stars call for Sio Tomkinson to change tackle technique following red card

(Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

Changes need to be made to Otago midfielder Sio Tomkinson’s tackle technique is he is to avoid further disciplinary issues in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s the verdict from two Mitre 10 Cup stars in the wake of Tomkinson’s red card offence for a dangerous high tackle on Auckland first-five Simon Hickey in Dunedin on Saturday.

The 24-year-old was sent from the field in injury time for an explosive hit on Hickey that saw his shoulder land on the the veteran playmaker’s head during Otago’s 38-6 defeat at the hands of Auckland at Forsyth Barr Stadium.

Video Spacer

How Dave Rennie will use the ‘Chiefs mana’ blueprint to change the Wallabies

Video Spacer

How Dave Rennie will use the ‘Chiefs mana’ blueprint to change the Wallabies

The impact of Tomkinson’s tackle forced Hickey from the field, and the results of a judiciary hearing released on Tuesday found the tackle to be reckless due to the direct contact to Hickey’s head.

Tomkinson has subsequently been suspended for six weeks, with his immediate admission of wrongdoing and expression of remorse preventing him for being sidelined for 10 weeks, which was ruled to be the entry point of the sanction.

Although he will miss Otago’s matches against Manawatu, Taranaki, Hawke’s Bay, Wellington, Counties Manukau and Northland, injured North Harbour hooker James Parsons believes an adjustment to Tomkinson’s tackle technique needs to be made to avoid further implications in the future.

Speaking to the Aotearoa Rugby Pod, Parsons pointed to Tomkinson’s unfavourable disciplinary track record that had already seen him pick up two yellow cards for dangerous tackles with the Highlanders in Super Rugby before last weekend’s dismissal.

ADVERTISEMENT

In February, Tomkinson was handed a yellow card when his shoulder collided with Tom Banks’ head during the Highlanders’ 23-22 win over the Brumbies, but a SANZAAR review led to a three-week suspension after it was deemed to be worthy of a red card.

Six months later, Tomkinson was again in the firing line for an off-the-ball shoulder charge on Crusaders prop Oli Jager during a 32-22 Super Rugby Aotearoa defeat in August.

Tomkinson, who was named in the South Island squad for this month’s North v South clash but didn’t take to the field in his side’s 38-35 victory in Wellington, was subsequently yellow carded, while Jager required hospitalisation.

Neither infringements were Tomkinson’s first brushes with the law, as he was sent off in the Highlanders’ season-opening clash with the Chiefs last year for a dangerous tackle on Brodie Retallick, although that red card was later rescinded by SANZAAR.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve actually spoken about it on here before. I think it was when he hit Oli Jager in the Crusaders game,” Parsons told the Aotearoa Rugby Pod of Tomkinson’s discipline issues.

“There does need to be an adjustment, and I know they’ve come out and said there’s an attempt to adjust his technique and stuff, but I think that is pretty reckless.”

Parsons made note of comments made by Auckland midfielder Rieko Ioane post-match, whereby he labelled Tomkinson’s tackle on Hickey as a “cheap shot”.

“I think if you refer to Rieko’s comments after the game, it obviously wasn’t well-received by the Auckland boys either,” Parsons said.

“I think he’s [Tomkinson] well aware of it, but there needs to be a pretty big shift in his technique. 

“He just needs to drop his height. I think his tackle technique’s fine, it’s just his where he’s hitting people.

“He had that one earlier this year against Tom Banks and the Brumbies as well, so it’s definitely something that needs to be rectified.”

Parsons, who has been ruled out of North Harbour’s provincial campaign due to concussion, added that something needs to change if Tomkinson is to stay out of trouble moving forward.

“For me, I suppose, with concussion issues, something does need to shift, or a punishment more severe that is going to bring about a change because you can’t just keep going to the judiciary and getting so many weeks and then it happening again.”

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CFCXNdeAp2a/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Parsons’ North Harbour teammate Bryn Hall described the indiscretion as “unfortunate”, but told the Aotearoa Rugby Pod that a harsh punishment is a necessity if Tomkinson is to eradicate ill-discipline from his game.

“I definitely reckon there’s no malice behind it, it’s just unfortunate. That tackle technique, he’s going to have to change it,” Hall said.

“He’s probably going to miss a few weeks, but then you think about a big game as well, you just don’t want those kinds of things happening where it can be a detriment to your team.

“Definitely know he’s not a dirty guy, but I think that needs to be sorted out for the future so he can help himself as well.”

Watch the entire episode above or listen in the player below:

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search