Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'High profile, high achiever' long shortlist has delighted the RFU

The England team at Twickenham last March (Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

RFU boss Bill Sweeney has claimed that the newly announced professional game partnership (PGP) will have a high profile person named as the independent chair of the professional rugby board (PRB) tasked with its smooth running. The PRB will have an independent chair and two further independent members on the board that will oversee the eight-year partnership that was signed off on Wednesday following 18 months of negotiations.

ADVERTISEMENT

The RFU and Premiership Rugby will each have three voting members on the board, including the RFU’s newly appointed board member Wayne Barnes, while players union RPA will have two seats (one voting and one observer) to ensure that players are central to decision making for the professional game.

No independent members have yet been appointed to the board but Sweeney was enthused by the midweek call that was had with the recruitment agency heading up the job search to find the right person, claiming there as “no lack of interest” in candidates to become the independent chair.

Video Spacer

‘This Energy Never Stops’ – One year to go until the Women’s Rugby World Cup

With exactly one year to go until Women’s Rugby World Cup England 2025 kicks off
in Sunderland, excitement is sweeping across the host nation in anticipation of what
will be the biggest and most accessible celebration of women’s rugby ever.

Register now for the ticket presale

Video Spacer

‘This Energy Never Stops’ – One year to go until the Women’s Rugby World Cup

With exactly one year to go until Women’s Rugby World Cup England 2025 kicks off
in Sunderland, excitement is sweeping across the host nation in anticipation of what
will be the biggest and most accessible celebration of women’s rugby ever.

Register now for the ticket presale

“On the governance side previously we had the professional game board which served a purpose, but it really lacked teeth,” said Sweeney, reflecting the governance of the previous eight-year deal that existed between the RFU and Premiership Rugby. “It didn’t really have the independence and the autonomy to make some of the bigger calls.

“So going forward now, the men’s professional rugby board, which is the new governing body for the professional game in England, will have three board representatives from PRL. It will also have one representative from RPA and it will also have Judith (Batchelar), who is the chair of RPA, as a regular observer with unrestricted access to any of the meetings, and you have three more members of that board who will come from the RFU.

Related

“It will be chaired by an independent chair, and there will be two independent non-executive directors. One ideally we want with a very strong, sporting credible background and the other one will probably be more of a governance type profile focused very much on how do you manage to deal with a group of stakeholders who have some conflicting needs on occasion – how do you manage your way through that process.

“We had the first call Wednesday morning with the executive search agency on the long shortlist… we just found it really difficult to get it down to the numbers we have got on their currently.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You’d all be surprised if you saw some of the names that are on that shortlist. They are really high profile, high achiever, well-known names in the city and in business and there has been no lack of interest in coming forward to be the independent chair for that professional rugby board.”

Sweeney added that while teething problems are expected with the implementation of the professional game partnership, he suggested that strong relationships between the various partners will ensure its work will get done.

“What we want happen here is that now that the PGB is signed, we don’t have to see it again. It’s put in a file somewhere, we never have to take it out, we don’t have to use it for disputes or conditions, whatever, but we will have a system in place which is also dependant on how the relationships work.

“Relationships always matter. They matter in business, they probably matter even more in sport, so this is all about settling it down, getting that working relationship going, have it independently chaired, two strong independent non-executive directors that are empowered to make decisions that are in the best interest for clubs and also country.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There will obviously be teething problems, there always are and I can guarantee you from conversations we have with other unions, whichever system structure you look at, it doesn’t matter which country, it may appear all rosy on the outside but they have issues to deal with.

“They have problems to deal with and they have their own unique ways of managing that, and that is the purpose of what we are doing here.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search