Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Highlanders player ratings vs Drua | Super Rugby Pacific

Martin Bogado with ball in hand for the Highlanders. Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images

Just when the injury woes for the Highlanders looked to be easing, four players go down in the 24 hours before theri round five match kicks off. An entirely new midfield combination was needed as well as a new lock and No 8.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Fijian Drua are likely the last team you want to face when you’re depth is being tested by injury and this match was certainly a test of all players’ physicality and fitness. The game was rapid in the opening 40, line breaks regularly resulted in 50-meter runs and there were tries galore.

Young players filling in for the Highlanders stepped up across the park while the Fijians provided some typical magic moments. The Highlanders survived the early back and forth to take a commanding halftime lead of 33-12.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The second 40 was more of an arm wrestle, points were a little harder to come by which meant the tries that were scored were even more impressive. Despite being down, the Drua looked dangerous throughout and always pose a comeback threat so Highlanders coach Clarke Dermody will be pleased to see some young Highlanders make the plays to keep a lid on the game. Fulltime score: 57-24.

Related

Here’s how the Highlanders rated:

1. Ethan de Groot –  7.5

Perhaps lucky once or twice at scrum time but otherwise enjoyed dominance in that contest. Produced a strong finish through two Fijian defenders to score the Highlanders’ second try. His physicality stood up well against the tough Fijian pack.

2. Leni Apisai  – 8

Made some strong runs and really asserted himself on the match, almost to the point of injury but the Super Rugby veteran played through the pain and put in a huge shift. Got through 12 tackles.

3. Jermaine Ainsley – 7.5

ADVERTISEMENT

Showed great timing and positioning to score the Highlanders’ first try. Ainsley stood up physically and performed well at scrum time. He made himself known in the rolling mauls, dragging his men forward and holding off Fijian disruptors.

4. Pari Pari Parkinson – 7

The injury-prone Parkinson looked to have taken another knock in this one but soldiered on past halftime, maintaining his strong work in the lineout and set piece.

5. Will Tucker – 7.5

One of the late call-ups for this match, Tucker got through a mountain of work defensively with 15 tackles.

6. Sean Withy  – 8

A huge effort from Withy, equalling Will Tucker’s mark of 15 tackles but without a miss to his name. He was involved around the wider fringes on attack too, showing his agility to facilitate the winger’s runs and kept up with the plays well to secure the ball. Put in a number of big hits at key moments.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Billy Harmon (c)  – 7.5

A mixed performance from the captain, with some great work on defence and some lacklustre moments. Was penalised three times. Keeping a team composed and firing against the Drua is a tough ask and Harmon deserves plenty of credit for that.

8. Nikora Broughton – 8.5

An early knock-on but found some great lines to run and made a massive amount of meters, playing a huge role in many of the Highlanders’ scoring opportunities. Had some strong moments in defence but also was caught out by some Fijian plays. A chip-through for Cam Millar’s try showed the skillset and instincts that has Higlanders fans so excited for Broughton’s future.

9. Aaron Smith – 9

Smith’s ability to be so dominant regardless of the style of game is truly special. He made the frantic nature of the match look natural and pulled the strings of his attack superbly throughout. A sniping run off the ruck five meters out saw him beat three players to score.

10. Mitch Hunt – 6.5

Hunt’s skillset for game management didn’t find much influence over such a wild match, but the No 10 still managed some class touches. Defensively, Hunt’s size was targetted by the Drua and he struggled in a number of interactions.

11. Jonah Lowe – 7.5

Lowe managed to contribute some playmaking in the match, running around players in field and putting his side in good positions. Even his indecision payed off for the Highlanders as he darted left and right behind th breakdown and eventually set up Cam Millar’s try.

12. Jake Te Hiwi – N/A

An energised start was unfortunately cut short, off in the 11th minute.

13. Fetuli Paeab – 8

Was tested in defence early by the explosive Fijian backs but Paea was up to the challenge, managing his distance well to make the tackles. Continued his strong work throughout and made some big plays, especially on the defensive end.

14. Martin Bogado – 8

The Argentine’s physicality came into its own against the Drua. Bogado kept his composure in the face of some heavy defence and imposed himself on the match, limping over for a well-earned try.

15. Sam Gilbert – 9

Gilbert got plenty of practice off the tee in this one and managed a decent success rate. He spent just ten minutes at fullback before being moved up into the midfield and didn’t skip a beat. An unorthodox charge down led to a great effort try. Won a turnover to start the second half.

 

Replacements:

 

16. Jack Taylor  – 6.5

17. Daniel Lienert-Brown  – 7.5

18. Saula Ma’u – 7

19. Josh Bekhuis – 7

20. James Lentjes  – 7

21. Folau Fakatava  – 7.5

22. Cameron Millar – 7

Some bright moments and some mistakes for the youngster, but he’ll remember the match for his try.

23. Connor Garden-Bashcop – 8

On early and quickly had a positive influence on the match. Was unfortunate to be yellow-carded in the 30th minute. Was darting around with his typical enthusiasm and intent making the most of the opportunities in front of him.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 14 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search