Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

HMRC wins Stuart Barnes tax case over Sky Sports job

Stuart Barnes (L) and Miles Harrison, the Sky TV rugby commentators look on during the Aviva Premiership match between Leicester Tigers and London Wasps at Welford Road on April 14, 2013 in Leicester, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

HMRC – the UK’s revenue authority – have overturned a successful appeal made by former England flyhalf Stuart Barnes over his employment at Sky Sports.

ADVERTISEMENT

The case centred around whether or not Barnes was an employee of Sky Sports or if he was working as part of his own business – S&L Barnes Ltd – for Sky.

Last year Barnes won a first-tier tax tribunal regarding his IR35 status which saw him avoid a £695,000 tax liability, pertaining to his work for Sky Sports between 2013 and 2019.

Video Spacer

Rassie Erasmus on his rivalry with Razor Robertson

Video Spacer

Rassie Erasmus on his rivalry with Razor Robertson

Barnes had previously been notified by HMRC that he should have been operating within IR35 legislation and consequently owed £695,461.97 in tax, made up of £481,364.20 in PAYE and £214,097.77 in National Insurance contributions.

HMRC have have now overturned the decision at the Upper Tribunal, overturning the first-tier tribunal’s decision.

CEO of IR35 Shield Dave Chaplin – who attended the upper-tier hearing in person – said: “The Stuart Barnes case was a close call that could have gone either way. It’s crucial to note that HMRC’s first ground of appeal failed, with the Upper Tribunal upholding the First-Tier Tribunal’s decision regarding the variation of terms related to Sky’s ‘right of first call’.

“However, HMRC’s second ground of appeal, which was more controversial, did succeed. This ground focused on how the First-Tier Tribunal approached the third stage of the Ready Mixed Concrete test and which factors it considered relevant to go into the mix for the full evaluation. The surprising element was that the UT chose to interfere with the evaluative nature of a multi-factorial decision by a First-tier tribunal.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Both parties requested at the hearing that if an error of law was found, they preferred the Upper Tribunal to remake the decision rather than remit it back to the First-Tier Tribunal. Had the case been remitted, it’s possible that the First-Tier Tribunal might have drawn a different conclusion – but it would have been a 50/50 chance.

“This ruling now means that none of the cases involving individuals providing services to Sky TV have succeeded at the tax tribunal.

“This case underscores the need for freelancers and their clients to ensure that their contracts and working practices accurately reflect the true nature of their relationship.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 8 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING David Ribbans: 'It's the reason why I'm here, not still in England' Exclusive RugbyPass interview: Toulon co-captain David Ribbans
Search