Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Hopefully we can get back': Sam Whitelock keen on Super Rugby return to South Africa

(Photo by Sydney Seshibedi/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Crusaders star Sam Whitelock says he is eager to return to South Africa in a Super Rugby capacity, two years after the departure of the country’s teams from the competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bulls, Lions, Sharks and Stormers all left Super Rugby following the global outbreak of Covid-19 in 2020, paving the way for a move north to join Europe’s United Rugby Championship, previously known as the Pro14.

That move brought an end to a 25-year Super Rugby alliance between New Zealand, Australia and South Africa, with the former two countries continuing the competition with a Pacific-centric focus with the inclusions of Moana Pasifika and the Fijian Drua.

Video Spacer

Is this the best uncapped player in New Zealand rugby right now? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Is this the best uncapped player in New Zealand rugby right now? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

In spite of the South African teams’ decision to align themselves with clubs from Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Italy, the Springboks remain in the Rugby Championship.

The South African Rugby Union confirmed earlier this year that the Springboks will stay in SANZAAR’s annual international tournament – which also features the All Blacks, Wallabies and Los Pumas – until 2025.

After four years away from South Africa, the All Blacks will return to the Republic for two tests in this year’s edition of the competition, their first visit to the country since 2018.

Whitelock will likely join his countrymen in travelling to South Africa, a prospect he told media earlier this week that he was relishing.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the All Blacks veteran, who will play for the Crusaders against the Chiefs on Saturday, also indicated that he hoped to return to South Africa with the Christchurch-based franchise at some point in the future.

“South Africa, they play a certain style,” Whitelock said when asked about how he has found the rebranded Super Rugby Pacific competition without the South African franchises.

“They’ve got big, strong guys, that’s their strength, that’s the way they like to play. It is something that I do personally enjoy having in the Super Rugby environment because they’re hard to play against.

“Going over there travelling, it’s an awesome place to travel to, but, also, it’s very hard to play there.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s something that I’ve been lucky enough to have in my career so far, and hopefully we can get back at some stage, whether that carries on as Rugby Championship or Super Rugby.”

Related

Between his Super Rugby debut in 2010 and South Africa’s exit from the competition, Whitelock toured the country every year with the Crusaders, who normally played two South African teams per trip to the Republic.

The 33-year-old lock also captained the Crusaders to their first title in nine years when they beat the Lions in Johannesburg in the 2017 Super Rugby final, the only to be won by a foreign team on South African soil.

In spite of those fond memories of his time in Africa, Whitelock maintained that Super Rugby Pacific still has a strong competitive edge, even without a South African presence in the league.

“I think it’s quite early in the season at the moment, but there is some close games that have gone on, and I think it just shows how tight this competition is,” he said.

“We haven’t had any cross-over games yet, so while we’re still obviously in New Zealand, it’s going to be interesting when we do get those cross-over games just to see where everyone’s at.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search