Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How a 2011 lesson has fired up the Tony Brown-inspired Springboks

South Africa attack coach Tony Brown (Photo by Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Gary Gold believes the arrival of Tony Brown as the Springboks attack coach has been crucial in turning the Rugby World Cup champions into an even more dangerous threat, with the painful lessons of 2011 shaping the controversial selection calls made by head coach Rassie Erasmus for their latest match with Australia this Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Physically dominating opponents and canny use of its bomb squad of forward replacements remain at the heart of South Africa’s tactical plan, but the team is now showing an ability to deliver eye-catching new moves – as showcased last weekend in the thumping 33-7 win over the Wallabies in Brisbane in the opening round of the 2024 Rugby Championship.

Crucially, Erasmus has bolstered his staff with the addition of Kiwi Brown on attack and Ireland’s Jerry Flannery in defence, with the ultimate aim being a third successive World Cup triumph in Australia in 2027.

Video Spacer

Springbok forward Marco van Staden on the large contingent of Bulls players in the Bok pack for the Perth Test

Rassie Erasmus caused a stir with his elections for the match against the Wallabies in Perth, but there will be several players in that pack who know each other really well.

Video Spacer

Springbok forward Marco van Staden on the large contingent of Bulls players in the Bok pack for the Perth Test

Rassie Erasmus caused a stir with his elections for the match against the Wallabies in Perth, but there will be several players in that pack who know each other really well.

To achieve that, Erasmus knows – thanks to mistakes made in 2011 – that he has to blood new players while also moving the game plan forward. Against the Wallabies at Suncorp, for instance, the Springboks used winger Cheslin Kolbe at scrum-half to feed the ball into the scrum and also as a lineout thrower, while their double catch lineout trick play delivered a driving maul try from Siya Kolisi, their captain.

The world champions have now made 10 changes for their second game of the Championship in Perth this weekend, which makes the Wallabies’ attempt to bounce back even harder as they must deal with a different line-up, rendering the lessons from Brisbane largely useless. What is more certain is that while the personnel has changed, there will be more innovative attacking plays and switches of position under Erasmus.

Fixture
Rugby Championship
Australia
12 - 30
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

Gold was part of the Springboks coaching team under Peter de Villiers that won the 2009 Tri-Nations and the Test series against the touring British and Irish Lions. In the build-up to the 2011 World Cup in New Zealand, de Villiers included Erasmus and 2023 Boks head coach Jacques Nienaber as consultants.

For the Tri-Nations that year, de Villiers took a new look squad to Australia, leaving key players behind to work with Erasmus and Nienaber. That decision did not work as the Springboks were beaten 39-20 in Australia, and they manged to only win a single game in the competition before then losing in the World Cup quarter-finals to the Wallabies in New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

For Gold, the key difference on this occasion is that Erasmus has given himself enough time to introduce new players in a World Cup cycle. He told RugbyPass: “In 2011, we went a bridge too far. I know that Rassie has said that is one of the lessons he learnt because you had a brilliant team on paper but possibly 18 months earlier, younger guys should have been blooded and given enough time to be able to go to a World Cup and feel comfortable.

“While the idea was right the timing wasn’t. We probably should have done it a year earlier. I have no doubt in my mind that is playing a large role in why guys are coming in this weekend. Rassie has interest in the bank (with the fans). Even if he loses a handful of Tests in the next year, people will understand because Rassie is thorough and meticulous in what he wants to do.”

Gold, who was part of the Bulls coaching team last season, worked with Brown when he was a player and is excited about the input he is giving the Springboks. He added: “I worked with Tony when Rassie and I were coaching the Stormers and he was one of our players.

“Even then you could see he was a really good thinker of the game. He has coached in Super Rugby, had a very successful time in Japan and the fit with Rassie is tremendous. After two World Cup cycles, the Boks are a pretty established team and they know where their strengths lie.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With Rassie, what has always been the Holy Grail is to aspire to a have a team that is difficult to analyse and this team has a lot of strings to its bow. Their fundamentals and foundation is built on physicality, which is a given, but he realises that other teams are physical.

“What is brilliant in terms of the thinking is that he is expanding our supposedly one dimensional game. If you had said to me in 2015 we would have a back three where the tallest player was Willie le Roux with no one weighing over 90 kgs I would have said that is impossible.

Related

“Now we have Willie, Cheslin Kolbe and Kurt-Lee Arendse and they are brilliant exponents of space. With Tony, we have been a lot better in terms of not just scrumming, mauling and kicking and have played from areas we wouldn’t have in the past.

“Tony is bringing an attacking finesse with the team trying to play a game that sees them tightening up the defence because of good forward momentum and then move it to the quick guys. There will be quite a few tricks up their sleeves.

“For Perth, there are wholesale changes and Rassie wants the opposition to sit down and try and work out what the Springboks will do from a six-man lineout 10 metres from the opposition line. You look at it and it has been different every time!

“For the Tests in 2024 and 2025, Rassie is making a conscious effort to get these younger guys to play in over 30 Tests by the 2027 tournament.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search