Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How a prince and a WW2 U.S. military seizure created the PNC knockout venues

Japan's Brave Blossoms recognise the crowd. Photo by Koki Nagahama/Getty Images

The Pacific Nations Cup final round is currently taking place in Japan. The 5th and 6th-place playoff and semifinals were held at Prince Chichibu Memorial Rugby Stadium, while the final and 3rd-place playoff will take place at Hanazono Rugby Stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both are iconic rugby venues, deeply rooted in Japan’s history, and fitting stages for deciding the tournament’s champion.

Japanese rugby has long had a close connection with the Imperial Family. Currently, the honorary president of the Japan Rugby Football Union is Her Imperial Highness Princess Akiko. A known rugby enthusiast, she has attended both the 2019 and 2023 Rugby World Cups.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Prince Chichibu Memorial Rugby Stadium is named after Prince Yasuhito Chichibu (1902–1953), brother of Emperor Showa, who had a profound interest in sports, particularly rugby.

For those unfamiliar with the sport, they might assume the stadium is located in Chichibu City, Saitama Prefecture. However, it is not in Chichibu City, which is 90 kilometres from Tokyo Station, but in Minato Ward, just a 15-minute subway ride from Tokyo Station.

The stadium’s origins are tied to the efforts of rugby club alumni from various universities.

In 1945, after Japan’s defeat in World War II, the Meiji Jingu Stadium, previously used for rugby, was seized by the U.S. military, making it unavailable for the sport.

Determined to build their own rugby stadium, rugby club alumni scoured the area for land and eventually secured the current site. To fund the project, they sold personal belongings, including watches and valuables, and even participated in the construction themselves.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is a famous anecdote about Prince Chichibu visiting the construction site in boots to offer encouragement and even lowering his head to the construction company, saying, quote: “The rugby community lacks funds, but we need your help.”

In 1947, the stadium was completed and originally named ‘Tokyo Rugby Stadium’. However, following Prince Chichibu’s passing in 1953, it was renamed in his honour, becoming the ‘Prince Chichibu Memorial Rugby Stadium’ we know today.

Hanazono Rugby Stadium in Osaka also owes its origins to Prince Chichibu. In October 1928, while en route to visit the Kashihara Shrine in Nara, where the first emperor of Japan is enshrined, Prince Chichibu passed through the area where Hanazono Rugby Stadium now stands.

Noticing the available land, he suggested to a railway company executive accompanying him that they consider building a rugby stadium. This suggestion led to the stadium’s construction later that year, and in 1929, it officially opened with the prince and his wife attending the opening ceremony.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Over the years, Hanazono has become synonymous not only with matches involving Japan’s national team, corporate teams, and university matches but also with the national high school rugby tournament.

Many players in Japan begin playing rugby in high school, and almost every high school player dreams of competing at Hanazono. It remains a special place for Japanese rugby players.

Both Prince Chichibu Memorial Rugby Stadium and Hanazono Rugby Stadium, which have long supported Japanese rugby, are undergoing changes.

Prince Chichibu Memorial Rugby Stadium, having aged significantly, is slated for redevelopment as part of a larger area renewal project. Plans announced two years ago include swapping locations with the neighbouring Jingu Stadium and building a new, state-of-the-art all-weather stadium with a retractable roof, featuring artificial turf.

The new stadium will have seven above-ground floors and one underground level, with a seating capacity of 15,500, about 10,000 fewer than the current stadium. Similar to the U Arena in Paris, it will also host concerts and other events. Originally scheduled for completion at the end of 2027, the project has faced delays due to a ‘Heritage Alert’ issued by the UNESCO advisory body, ICOMOS, concerning the planned tree removal in the area.

There are concerns that turning the venue into an indoor stadium could detract from its traditional rugby atmosphere. Due to the prime urban location, political interests also complicate efforts to preserve the venue as a rugby-only stadium. One wonders what the rugby alumni, who worked tirelessly to secure the land after the war, would think of these developments.

Head-to-Head

Last 3 Meetings

Wins
3
Draws
0
Wins
0
Average Points scored
38
18
First try wins
67%
Home team wins
67%

Hanazono Rugby Stadium, owned for many years by the Kintetsu Railway Company, was transferred to Higashi-Osaka City in 2015 due to high maintenance costs. The stadium’s name was changed from Kintetsu Hanazono Rugby Stadium’ to ‘Higashi-Osaka City Hanazono Rugby Stadium’.

However, Kintetsu has continued to provide strong support to its rugby team, Kintetsu Liners, which was founded in 1929, the same year the stadium opened.

The Kintetsu Liners enjoyed a golden era from the 1950s to the early 1970s. After being relegated to Division 2 last season, the team is aiming to return to Division 1 this season. The team currently boasts notable players, including
former Australia internationals Will Genia and Quade Cooper, and recently added New Zealand international Akira Ioane to the squad list.

Higashi-Osaka City has also embraced rugby as part of its community revitalization efforts, successfully hosting a Rugby World Cup match during Japan’s 2019 tournament. The city declared September 22, the date of the Italy vs. Namibia match in the World Cup, as ‘Hanazono Rugby Day’ marking an annual celebration of the sport.

The Pacific Nations Cup final will take place the day before, on September 21, at this historic venue to decide which team will raise the championship cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
b
by George! 92 days ago

Thanks for the history lesson.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search