Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How a snub by England assistant Mitchell gave birth to Brock James' stellar French club career

It was rejection by John Mitchell that spurred Brock James into leaving for France... and the rest is history

Brock James has spoken about how rejection by current England defence coach John Mitchell sparked his stellar career in the French Top 14.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was Mitchell who unceremoniously cut loose the Australian talisman from the Western Force way back in 2006, forcing the out-half to take his chances elsewhere.

Fourteen years later, he is still going strong as a player at the age of 38 at La Rochelle after a long stint at title-winning Clermont was followed by a first taste of coaching at Bordeaux. 

Asked by Midi Olympique, the bi-weekly French newspaper, if he had any regrets about never becoming a Test player for Australia, James said: “No, for me it’s simple, I left Australia quite young because I couldn’t even find a job in Super Rugby. 

“John Mitchell (the Western Force coach at the time) told me that I was the fifth No10 in the hierarchy and that I would not even play in friendlies. So I looked for something else. I wanted to challenge myself and I had the opportunity to come to France. Small stops in my career have always moved me forward so I have no regrets.”

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

James has since gone on to move within reach of becoming the all-time record scorer in France. With 3,003 points on the clock since his arrival in France, he is just short of the record of Romain Teulet (3,007).

However, the clock is finally winding down on the career, James admitting this will definitely be his last season as a player after he was tempted into joining La Rochelle by Jono Gibbes and giving it one final lash. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is the last year to get the most out of it, and as soon as I’m on the field I will try to do my job and have as much fun as possible,” he said. “From the moment I accepted, I knew it was my last. You can’t play forever, even if you want to. It’s a good way to end. 

“I have spent two great years at La Rochelle, a club that I love in a region that I love. My family are well-settled, so the project proposed by Jono was interesting as the last challenge,” he continued, hoping for an emotional send-off as his current’s club final regulation season fixture will be against his old team, Clermont. 

“I imagine there will be a lot of emotions. I just hope I’ll be on the sheet match. That would be wonderful.”

WATCH: RugbyPass have made something truly special with the Barbarians rugby team – the release date is Sunday, January 12

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search