Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How a well-intended New Zealand initiative could threaten the integrity of rugby

Crusaders vs Blues (Photo: Getty Images)

It’s a laudable idea.

New Zealand Rugby (NZR) are attempting to eliminate any potential impediments to the playing of club and secondary schools rugby in 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dubbed ‘Game On’, NZR’s new initiative will allow premier men’s club matches to be played by as few as 10 players per side, with rolling substitutions and maybe uncontested scrums. The same rules would apply to all adult and college grades.

In 10 a-side children’s rugby, if you only have seven players on Saturday, then the opposition will only field seven at a time themselves.

Video Spacer

The Sky Sports NZ team brings you all the latest chat from around rugby in New Zealand as the Super Rugby Aotearoa competition draws nearer.

Video Spacer

The Sky Sports NZ team brings you all the latest chat from around rugby in New Zealand as the Super Rugby Aotearoa competition draws nearer.

Again, these sound like good things.

In consultation with the match referee and opposing team, premier sides will need to come to an agreement about whether there will be pushing in the scrums. Finding four capable props every week isn’t easy for teams and it’s hoped that making scrums uncontested would mean fewer defaults.

In a season as disrupted and unusual as this one, the theory is that we want as many people playing as much rugby as we can.

Game On will be reviewed after this year and amended, if necessary, for implementation again in 2021.

Not every provincial union has to adopt Game On. Or they can choose to use it in some grades and not others.

ADVERTISEMENT

NZR says Game On is already being utilised in some provinces, including at premier grade level.

The worry here, though, is the way these new protocols could be manipulated to one team’s advantage.

If Saturday’s opponents say they can’t rustle up any – or enough – props, who are you to argue? Never mind that strong scrummaging is integral to your own team’s success, if the opposition say they can only field a pack of eight loose forwards, then that’s that.

Among the reasons why rugby has connected with so many New Zealanders over the years is because it’s a broad church. Big or small, white or brown, fast or slow, tall or short, rugby had a place for you.

But as times change, and playing numbers dwindle, we seem to be going further and further down a path towards 10 a-side rugby and to a certain build of athlete. And, if we’re being absolutely honest, to a game that looks more and more like rugby league.

ADVERTISEMENT

The NRL returned to our screens over the weekend, along with a couple of tweaks designed to make the game more free-flowing.

On average, the ball was in play for 57 of the 80 minutes and featured more tries, more play-the-balls, more linebreaks and fewer penalties than had been the case in the two rounds of football played before the COVID-19 lockdown.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CA6Y5E6g8U8/

That’s nice, but NRL head of football Graham Annesley said he’d been around too long to assume those trends would continue.

“I’m not complaining, but the coaches will be looking [at] how to counter the changes,’’ Annesley told The Sydney Morning Herald.

Rugby league identity Phil Gould has talked long and loud over the years about, what he calls, the “law of unintended consequences.’’

Of how well-intentioned officials, often in consultation with stakeholders, make changes to the game with certain outcomes in mind, only to find something quite different emerges instead.

We all recognise where rugby is going in this country. From next year, under-12 and 13 grades will change from 15 to 10 a-side. Under 11s have already gone that way.

For now, premier grade club teams have the option of playing 10 a-side. Before long it’s not hard to imagine that will become the norm.

If there are scrums, they’ll be of the five-man variety and won’t feature any pushing.

And, again, that’s fine. The game has to evolve and it has to adapt to its changing circumstances and maybe a time isn’t that far off when high-performance rugby goes 10 a-side as well

It’s just that, at that point, rugby will cease to be a game for all shapes and sizes and simply one in which everyone is 1.85cm and 100 kilograms. Heck, maybe we could even go under-85kg rugby across the board, eliminating great swathes of the current rugby-playing populous.

In the meantime, Game On’s rules look ripe for exploitation. For fair contests to be altered to become unfair ones and for relations between clubs and teams to turn sour.

It’s great that community rugby is about to kick off, but just be aware it might look a little different to how you remembered it.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search