Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Showed me how to be professional': How an ABs great changed Whitelock's career

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Two-time Rugby World Cup winner Sam Whitelock has revealed how an All Blacks great “showed me how to be a professional” early in his career.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whitelock will go down in history as one of the sports all-time greats when his career is all said and done; with his leadership and work ethic simply synonymous with the All Blacks’ high standards.

But he’s had to learn some lessons along the way.

Before entering the fray of professional senior rugby, Whitelock was part of the champion Baby Blacks team of 2008.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

That squad, who won the World Championship with a dominant 38-3 demolition of England, included Aaron Smith, Zac Guilford, Ash Dixon and Scotland’s Sean Maitland.

But Whitelock was a special talent; he was always destined for more.

Whitelock made his provincial debut for Canterbury shortly after, and later won his first Super Rugby cap with the Crusaders in 2010.

The towering lock didn’t stop there though, as he was called up to the All Blacks for the first time.

As Whitelock discussed on The Good, The Bad & The Rugby, packing down alongside dual-international Brad Thorn proved to be an educational experience for the rising star.

ADVERTISEMENT

“(I’ve been) really privileged with the way my career has gone so far and I’ve had some amazing people that have helped me along the way.

“The one thing that probably sums it up in my mind is how I started. Being this guy rocking up, playing alongside Brad Thorn.

“Thorny used to grab your shoulder, big hands and start laughing, ‘oh come with me boy.’ He actually showed me how to be professional; showed me how to stretch, ice bath, look after my body.

“He always said for him, he used to always look at the gym as an opportunity to grow your body, grow your defence, grow your big shields.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I remember I was 21, 22, I was getting beaten up every game and he was like ‘I feel great’ because he had these defences.

“For my first game I was 106 kgs where the heaviest I’ve been is 124, so that is all pretty much muscle and defences and shields, and that’s probably why I’ve been lucky to play a long time.”

Whitelock went on to start in the 2011 Rugby World Cup final against France alongside Thorn, with the All Blacks ending 24-years of hurt in front of a passionate Eden Park crowd.

Now, more than a decade on, Whitelock has become one of the most important players in New Zealand rugby.

Whether it’s domestically with the champion Crusaders, or captaining the All Blacks during their recent Autumn Nations Series campaign, the lock is irreplaceable.

While he admitted that “the enjoyment side” of professional “has changed”, the 143-test veteran still looks forward to playing the game he loves.

“I still enjoy it, and I think anyone that’s played rugby to a high level knows that if you’re not enjoying it, you’re not going to put your head in that dark spot and stop a defensive maul or make all these tackles because it does hurt, it is hard,” he added.

“But the enjoyment side has changed. When you’re younger, yeah we all want to go out and score 100 tries.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 41 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search