Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How an unemployed German prop got dropped in at the deep end at an English rugby superpower

The scrum during the 2015 Premiership Rugby A League Final between Worcester Cavaliers and Saracens Storm (Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)

When Samy Füchsel received the call to go to England, there was scant time for nerves to kick in.

Germany defence and forwards coach, Mouritz Botha, had learned of a tighthead shortage at Saracens and asked his prop to cut a video to show his one-time employers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Füchsel did not expect anything to come of it. Unlike many of his former Heidelberger RK (HRK) team-mates, he had not chased an overseas contract when Hans-Peter’s Wild’s decision to pull funding for the club and his eponymous academy this summer left them unemployed.

Instead, Füchsel relocated to Frankfurt to complete an apprenticeship in sports and fitness sales, commuting back to Heidelberg three times a week to train with the national team as they prepared for the Rugby World Cup Repechage in Marseille, which starts on Sunday.

Botha’s faith in his charge’s ability ultimately proved founded and one Friday in late September the 26-year-old was given less than 48 hours’ notice to board a flight to the UK.

Video Spacer

“Mouritz called me on a Friday and said ‘are you ready to go to London on Sunday?’” Füchsel tells RugbyPass. “At first I was a bit shocked and I had to check some stuff in Frankfurt, that it was alright that I could go.

“So, I was busy organising all this stuff so I couldn’t really focus on the flight but when I arrived there, of course, I was a little bit nervous.”

Füchsel had tried his luck abroad once before, spending time with French club SC Albi in Pro D2 two years previously, but this was a step up, and into the unknown.

ADVERTISEMENT
Sammy Fuchsel Credit: Deutscher Rugby-Verband

On the drive out to Saracens’ training base near St Albans, butterflies began to flutter in his stomach as the realisation set in that he would be rubbing shoulders with giants of the international game, players he had only previously encountered on television.

What would Owen Farrell or Billy and Mako Vunipola make of the boy from Berlin?

He needn’t have worried. “The players were so nice to me, I felt so welcome from the first minute,” Füchsel says.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Actually all my fears and my doubts vanished from the first second and I could enjoy my time pretty soon. It was pretty good.”

Billy Vunipola looks on during the Saracens training session. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

He adds: “It was pretty funny, you have guys like Will Skelton come to you in a really friendly way, and they cheer you up and ask you what you’re doing here.

“They showed so much interest, every player – the Vunipolas, Farrell – everybody was asking me what I’m doing here and we got on really well.”

Füchsel admits that, despite the warm welcome he received in St Albans, it took until the third day of training to feel “normal” in his surroundings.

The prop was sold to Saracens as a dynamic ball-carrier – as highlighted by his impressive score in Germany’s narrow defeat to Samoa in the second leg of their World Cup play-off in July – but his scrummaging was put under the microscope in outer London.

“They showed me some tricks, (and) some things that I need to focus on,” Füchsel admits. According to the 26-year-old, training with Farrell, Skelton and co was the “highest level I’ve ever been”, while his appearance for Saracens’ A team, the Storm, in the Premiership Rugby Shield pushed his fitness to the limit.

“Maybe (playing) Samoa was a bit more physical but the A game was way faster, way quicker,” he says. “So, it was really intense.

“I played 30 minutes, I came on in the second half and I tried to work as hard as I can and I was pretty, pretty done after those 30 minutes.”

Credit: World Rugby/Deutscher Rugby Verband

Off the pitch, Füchsel’s trip included two trips to England’s capital, one on a team social to the Comedy Club and another to see some sights – he was as disappointed as many back-bench Conservative MPs to find Big Ben draped in scaffolding.

He has remained in email contact with Storm head coach Adam Powell, and it seems he made a good impression. “For a prop he’s got good acceleration,” Powell says.

“He scrummed well but that will be something for him to develop. But he’s a good mobile prop and we enjoyed having him, and hopefully he kicks on and Germany can upset the odds and qualify for the World Cup.”

Ultimately, qualification for next year’s World Cup is what it is all about for Füchsel and Germany. That is why he has spent most his time since September travelling between Frankfurt and Heidelberg, waking early and getting to bed late at least three times a week.

The hard work will be worth it if Mike Ford, Botha and the rest of the Germany coaching staff can mastermind victory over Hong Kong in Marseille on Sunday afternoon, and then defeats of Canada and Kenya later this month.

The carrot on the end of the stick is passage to Japan, and a place in Pool B alongside New Zealand and South Africa. “I probably would lie if I said I knew that I would play against the All Blacks one day and see the haka,” Füchsel says.

“It’s a bit surreal actually to think that it’s possible to face the best team in the world.”

The Germany v Samoa Rugby World Cup 2019 qualifying match in Heidelberg, Germany.

Füchsel insists Germany are focused solely on their first assignment in France against Hong Kong, but arguably the biggest obstacle facing Ford and his coaching panel is one they cannot see: The toll the previous year has taken on their squad.

Twelve months ago, when HRK’s players went on strike at the bidding of Wild in his dispute with the German Rugby Federation (DRV) they had no idea he would pull the plug six months later.

The ensuing year has been a roller coaster for many in the national team.

HRK qualified for, and were expelled from, the Challenge Cup – Wild’s ownership of Stade Francais deemed a conflict of interest by EPCR – while Germany’s hopes of World Cup qualification were reignited by an eligibility row. The DRV was subsequently forced to seek financial help from World Rugby to stage play-off matches and hire a coach, before their former benefactor returned to help inject some funds.

Germany’s pack test Samoa

Amid that backdrop a large section of the national squad was made unemployed and in search of contracts has been spread across the globe, from Heidelberg to Houston, Bucharest to Chambéry.

Training sessions have been sparsely attended at times, and it would be understandable if some players were battle weary. “Looking back at the last months you could actually write a book or make a movie out of it, the way it went down,” Füchsel says.

“I think it would be the perfect ending if we made the World Cup.

“It will make the pain of not going to the Challenge Cup, not vanish, but it will ease that pain a lot – and I think it will be a happy end for all of us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 20 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

46 Go to comments
f
fl 35 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

46 Go to comments
J
JW 38 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Generally disagree with what? The possibility that they would get whitewashed, or the idea they shouldn't gain access until they're good enough?


I think the first is a fairly irrelevant view, decide on the second and then worry about the first. Personally I'd have had them in a third lvl comp with all the bottom dwellers of the leagues. I liked the idea of those league clubs resting their best players, and so being able to lift their standards in the league, though, so not against the idea that T2 sides go straight into Challenge Cup, but that will be a higher level with smaller comps and I think a bit too much for them (not having followed any of their games/performances mind you).

Because I don't think that having the possibility of a team finishing outside the quarter finals to qualify automatically will be a good idea. I'd rather have a team finishing 5th in their domestic league.

fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen.


The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime.

46 Go to comments
J
JW 56 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

46 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

46 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Japan shock the world to win title over New Zealand and Australia Japan shock the world to win title
Search