Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How Beauden Barrett's new contract with the Blues could impact New Zealand rugby

Beauden Barrett's departure could implications all across New Zealand. (Photos by Getty Images)

News of Beauden Barrett’s move to the Blues has come as a surprise to many, given the obvious factors that were keeping him in Wellington.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett, however, was quick to note that reasons external to rugby played a major part in his decision, as they should.

With the Hurricanes, the Tarankai first-five knew what lay ahead of him. Next year the franchise’s biggest losses – excepting Barrett – will be Jeffery Toomaga-Allen, Matt Proctor and Nehe Milner-Skudder.

The Hurricanes have ready-made replacements for those players. Tyrel Lomax will join the team from the Highlanders and can slot straight onto the tighthead side of the scrum, whilst Proctor and Milner-Skudder’s absences can be covered by the likes of Vince Aso, Billy Proctor, Peter Umaga-Jensen, Danny Toala, Salesi Rayasi and Chase Tiatia.

In short, the Hurricanes could build on 2019’s semi-final finish and aim to usurp the Crusaders without too much re-building necessary.

The Blues are on the up, right?

Had Barrett remained with the Hurricanes, his season would have faced little disruption. An extended period away from Super Rugby to start the year may have left the Hurricanes with a little bit of catching up to do, but they’d likely still be in a good position to make a charge for the finals upon Barrett’s return.

Who knows what the playmaker will find when he arrives at the Blues late in the season next year?

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The Blues were already realistically out of the running for a playoffs spot three quarters of the way through the 2019 season. It was also arguably one of the easier years to make the playoffs, given the inconsistency from some of Super Rugby’s traditional heavy-hitters.

It’s not unbelievable to think that the Blues will do better next year, but there’s certainly far fewer certainties with the Auckland side than what Barrett would have had down in Wellington.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett’s move, of course, will have incredible repercussions around the New Zealand Super Rugby sides – we can probably expect a greater impact from Barrett switching to the Blues than any individual transfer has ever had on Super Rugby as a whole.

Blues already have ample first five coverage

The Blues are well stocked with three young first fives: Harry Plummer, Otere Black and Stephen Perofeta.

Although all three are signed for the Blues for 2020, it would not be surprising for one of them to be released from their contract to chase more game time elsewhere.

Barrett, Plummer and Perofeta can all cover more than one position in the backline, but there’s probably no point in having four primary first fives in one Super Rugby squad.

The Highlanders have Josh Ioane, Bryn Gatland and Mitch Hunt locked in for 2020 whilst the Crusaders have two All Blacks in Richie Mo’unga and Brett Cameron. The Chiefs and the Hurricanes, however, could be in desperate need of a first five.

Experienced talent needed at other franchises

This year, the Chiefs used Damian McKenzie, Marty McKenzie, Jack Debreczeni, Orbyn Leger and Stephen Donald at 10. Tiaan Falcon was also contracted but was ruled out with injury before the season started.

ADVERTISEMENT

Damian McKenzie is the only one of those six to have a confirmed contract with the Chiefs for next year – and he’s already signalled that he’d prefer to spend his time at fullback. Warren Gatland will be taking over as coach next year and his credentials could have the sway to lure in a promising player to the region.

The Chiefs will likely look at signing young Waikato and NZ U20s first five Rivez Reihana – but he’s very much a prospect for the future. Stephen Perofeta could be an excellent pick up for the team and would form an exciting partnership with Brad Weber and Te Toiroa Tahuriorangi. Given that Perofeta has spent the year out with injury, however he could be a risk pick up.

Rivez Reihana. (Photo by Amilcar Orfali/Getty Images)

The Hurricanes are also obviously missing a starting first five now that Barrett is off the books. Fletcher Smith and Jackson Garden-Bachop were both used in Barrett’s absence this year, but neither is yet to really prove themselves at Super Rugby level. Smith has been the better performer in New Zealand’s provincial scene to date, but Garden-Bachop probably made a better fist of his chances for the Hurricanes this year.

The Blues’ Otere Black began his career with the Hurricanes as an understudy to Barrett but moved north to push for a starting role. Perhaps a return to Black’s old franchise could be on the cards for the 24-year-old.

Blues in the box set

As Barrett won’t be available for the Blues until later in the season, they would be foolish to let go of more than one of their five-eighths. As we’ve seen in 2019, a season-ending injury can come at any time and depth plays a huge role in a team’s success.

Barrett’s late arrival may also mean he’s better utilised at fullback for 2020.

Contracting all three of the young first-fives means that the Blues are really in complete control of who they retain and who they let go – but the third or fourth choice 10 at the franchise won’t be very happy if they’re held onto when they could be starting elsewhere.

What about the other Barrett?

Beauden Barrett’s departure could spell further bad news for the Hurricanes, given that Jordie Barrett supposedly first signed with the team so that he could link up with his older brother. Jordie’s contract with New Zealand and the Hurricanes is also up at the end of 2019 and he could be interested in shifting elsewhere, now that Beauden is moving.

When Jordie burst onto the scene for Canterbury he was an absolute revelation. His first year of provincial rugby was arguably more accomplished than his older brothers, but he hasn’t quite developed at the rate that was expected. The Crusaders are masters at developing their talent into world class players, and Barrett’s ability to cover first five, midfield and the outside backs would make him an excellent acquisition, given that the Super Rugby champions are losing Mitch Hunt, Ryan Crotty and Israel Dagg for next season. Older brother and All Blacks teammate Scott is also well-established at the Crusaders.

There are plenty of other teams that would be clamouring for Barrett’s signature given his diverse skillset and obvious promise as a player. With the pull of Beauden no longer a carrot, the Hurricanes may struggle to keep Jordie in the capital.

Now might not be the best time to sign a new contract

Alternatively, Jordie may just want to spend a season earning some cash elsewhere. As a relatively junior player in the All Blacks setup, Jordie likely wouldn’t be able to negotiate the same kind of deal as Beauden, Brodie Retallick or Sam Whitelock, so he won’t be able to keep playing for the All Blacks if he does head overseas for even a season. With a new broadcasting deal likely to come into play in 2021, however, Jordie may find there’s a lot more money available if he waits until that season to sign a new contract with New Zealand Rugby.

Beauden Barrett’s decision to head north to the Blues will have ramifications throughout the country. He already cemented himself as an automatic pick with the All Blacks so he’s unlikely to lose any ground on the national scene, but he may find his Super Rugby successes drop off. Whatever happens on a personal level, his transfer will have a major impact at a number of New Zealand franchises – including at his beloved Hurricanes.

Check out the latest RugbyPass documentary on Fijian sensation, Nemani Nadolo:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search