Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How Beauden Barrett's new contract with the Blues could impact New Zealand rugby

Beauden Barrett's departure could implications all across New Zealand. (Photos by Getty Images)

News of Beauden Barrett’s move to the Blues has come as a surprise to many, given the obvious factors that were keeping him in Wellington.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett, however, was quick to note that reasons external to rugby played a major part in his decision, as they should.

With the Hurricanes, the Tarankai first-five knew what lay ahead of him. Next year the franchise’s biggest losses – excepting Barrett – will be Jeffery Toomaga-Allen, Matt Proctor and Nehe Milner-Skudder.

The Hurricanes have ready-made replacements for those players. Tyrel Lomax will join the team from the Highlanders and can slot straight onto the tighthead side of the scrum, whilst Proctor and Milner-Skudder’s absences can be covered by the likes of Vince Aso, Billy Proctor, Peter Umaga-Jensen, Danny Toala, Salesi Rayasi and Chase Tiatia.

In short, the Hurricanes could build on 2019’s semi-final finish and aim to usurp the Crusaders without too much re-building necessary.

The Blues are on the up, right?

Had Barrett remained with the Hurricanes, his season would have faced little disruption. An extended period away from Super Rugby to start the year may have left the Hurricanes with a little bit of catching up to do, but they’d likely still be in a good position to make a charge for the finals upon Barrett’s return.

Who knows what the playmaker will find when he arrives at the Blues late in the season next year?

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The Blues were already realistically out of the running for a playoffs spot three quarters of the way through the 2019 season. It was also arguably one of the easier years to make the playoffs, given the inconsistency from some of Super Rugby’s traditional heavy-hitters.

It’s not unbelievable to think that the Blues will do better next year, but there’s certainly far fewer certainties with the Auckland side than what Barrett would have had down in Wellington.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett’s move, of course, will have incredible repercussions around the New Zealand Super Rugby sides – we can probably expect a greater impact from Barrett switching to the Blues than any individual transfer has ever had on Super Rugby as a whole.

Blues already have ample first five coverage

The Blues are well stocked with three young first fives: Harry Plummer, Otere Black and Stephen Perofeta.

Although all three are signed for the Blues for 2020, it would not be surprising for one of them to be released from their contract to chase more game time elsewhere.

Barrett, Plummer and Perofeta can all cover more than one position in the backline, but there’s probably no point in having four primary first fives in one Super Rugby squad.

The Highlanders have Josh Ioane, Bryn Gatland and Mitch Hunt locked in for 2020 whilst the Crusaders have two All Blacks in Richie Mo’unga and Brett Cameron. The Chiefs and the Hurricanes, however, could be in desperate need of a first five.

Experienced talent needed at other franchises

This year, the Chiefs used Damian McKenzie, Marty McKenzie, Jack Debreczeni, Orbyn Leger and Stephen Donald at 10. Tiaan Falcon was also contracted but was ruled out with injury before the season started.

ADVERTISEMENT

Damian McKenzie is the only one of those six to have a confirmed contract with the Chiefs for next year – and he’s already signalled that he’d prefer to spend his time at fullback. Warren Gatland will be taking over as coach next year and his credentials could have the sway to lure in a promising player to the region.

The Chiefs will likely look at signing young Waikato and NZ U20s first five Rivez Reihana – but he’s very much a prospect for the future. Stephen Perofeta could be an excellent pick up for the team and would form an exciting partnership with Brad Weber and Te Toiroa Tahuriorangi. Given that Perofeta has spent the year out with injury, however he could be a risk pick up.

Rivez Reihana. (Photo by Amilcar Orfali/Getty Images)

The Hurricanes are also obviously missing a starting first five now that Barrett is off the books. Fletcher Smith and Jackson Garden-Bachop were both used in Barrett’s absence this year, but neither is yet to really prove themselves at Super Rugby level. Smith has been the better performer in New Zealand’s provincial scene to date, but Garden-Bachop probably made a better fist of his chances for the Hurricanes this year.

The Blues’ Otere Black began his career with the Hurricanes as an understudy to Barrett but moved north to push for a starting role. Perhaps a return to Black’s old franchise could be on the cards for the 24-year-old.

Blues in the box set

As Barrett won’t be available for the Blues until later in the season, they would be foolish to let go of more than one of their five-eighths. As we’ve seen in 2019, a season-ending injury can come at any time and depth plays a huge role in a team’s success.

Barrett’s late arrival may also mean he’s better utilised at fullback for 2020.

Contracting all three of the young first-fives means that the Blues are really in complete control of who they retain and who they let go – but the third or fourth choice 10 at the franchise won’t be very happy if they’re held onto when they could be starting elsewhere.

What about the other Barrett?

Beauden Barrett’s departure could spell further bad news for the Hurricanes, given that Jordie Barrett supposedly first signed with the team so that he could link up with his older brother. Jordie’s contract with New Zealand and the Hurricanes is also up at the end of 2019 and he could be interested in shifting elsewhere, now that Beauden is moving.

When Jordie burst onto the scene for Canterbury he was an absolute revelation. His first year of provincial rugby was arguably more accomplished than his older brothers, but he hasn’t quite developed at the rate that was expected. The Crusaders are masters at developing their talent into world class players, and Barrett’s ability to cover first five, midfield and the outside backs would make him an excellent acquisition, given that the Super Rugby champions are losing Mitch Hunt, Ryan Crotty and Israel Dagg for next season. Older brother and All Blacks teammate Scott is also well-established at the Crusaders.

There are plenty of other teams that would be clamouring for Barrett’s signature given his diverse skillset and obvious promise as a player. With the pull of Beauden no longer a carrot, the Hurricanes may struggle to keep Jordie in the capital.

Now might not be the best time to sign a new contract

Alternatively, Jordie may just want to spend a season earning some cash elsewhere. As a relatively junior player in the All Blacks setup, Jordie likely wouldn’t be able to negotiate the same kind of deal as Beauden, Brodie Retallick or Sam Whitelock, so he won’t be able to keep playing for the All Blacks if he does head overseas for even a season. With a new broadcasting deal likely to come into play in 2021, however, Jordie may find there’s a lot more money available if he waits until that season to sign a new contract with New Zealand Rugby.

Beauden Barrett’s decision to head north to the Blues will have ramifications throughout the country. He already cemented himself as an automatic pick with the All Blacks so he’s unlikely to lose any ground on the national scene, but he may find his Super Rugby successes drop off. Whatever happens on a personal level, his transfer will have a major impact at a number of New Zealand franchises – including at his beloved Hurricanes.

Check out the latest RugbyPass documentary on Fijian sensation, Nemani Nadolo:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors Scott Robertson responds about handling errors
Search