Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How did Scotland secure their first win after 14 months of heartbreak?

Scotland v Italy 6N 1

A ball knocked-on just shy of the try line. An overthrown lineout on your own team’s five metre line. A tackler getting their head on the wrong side. There are certain things that just never look right on a rugby pitch, and a small part of you dies inside every time you see it. You never want to witness it ever again.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nothing fits this description more than the heartbreaking sign of one of international rugby’s best and most inspiring captains, Rachel Malcolm, trying to hide her tears after yet another antagonising loss in which her squad battled to oblivion. It’s impossible not to cheer for Scotland, because for once you just want to see Malcolm celebrate on the full time whistle, and not talking about another game that got away.

And finally, finally on Saturday we got to hear Malcolm deliver her “we just won a game we weren’t favourites to win and I’m absolutely buzzing” speech. Scotland so richly deserve to finally have a win to their name, and Malcolm was one of the shining lights of the Test match. Wales and England will be grateful that they didn’t have to face Lisa Thomson and Jade Konkel-Roberts, who both had absolute stormers against Italy.

So how did Scotland pull it off? What did they get right that they didn’t in the first three rounds? Well, one factor was their kicking game, backed up by their brutal defence. Let’s have a quick look at how the likes of Helen Nelson booted Scotland into the right areas of the park.

If you have the game in front of you, the first half is littered with great moments of Scotland kicking: five minutes in, Thomson puts in a pearler which forces flanker Isabella Locatelli to fluff her lines, on seven minutes Nelson booms a boot downfield which the Italy backfield mess up, and on 18 minutes, this happens:

The Scottish backline pose the threat of a genuine attack. Meryl Smith runs a dummy-switch line off Nelson, and the rest of the backline hold their width and depth. Smith’s dummy line means Italy’s left winger, Aura Muzzo (out of shot on the right-hand side) has to maintain her place on the wing in case of a linebreak.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fullback Vittoria Ostuni Minuzzi, meanwhile, is considering joining the defensive line in case Scotland play wide. Nelson boots the ball downfield and it bounces on the Italian 22 and into Ostuni Minuzzi’s hands.

Fran McGhie is over Ostuni Minuzzi like a rash and chops her to the deck before she can launch a counter attack. Italy do well to clear out Thomson, who is in an excellent position over the ball, but the ball is slow and Scotland are immediately on the front foot.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scrum-half Sofia Stefan is swarmed as she scoops the ball up, as it is called as out by the referee. Italy are suddenly more vulnerable than ever – in their own 22 with both halfbacks at the bottom of a ruck. Italy would ideally kick from here, but they have to play another phase infield to get Stefan back on her feet. Scotland apply excellent linespeed and catch them behind the gainline.

Stefan gets the ball back to kicker Beatrice Rigoni, but Scotland apply great pressure. Thomson times her run from behind the back foot, meaning she is already at full speed by the time Stefan has passed the ball. She leaps to charge Rigoni down, narrowly missing, and likely shaving a couple of dozen metres off her kick. Mairi McDonald also applies good linespeed so Rigoni has no opportunity to run out. The ball goes into touch just beyond the 22 for a Scottish line-out.

Bear in mind, this 30 metre net-gain comes for two reasons: one being Scotland’s attacking shape off the scrum. Their depth and width were so on-point that Italy were convinced Scotland were about to attack. The other reason is Fran McGhie’s kick chase, followed up by the Scottish pack’s work rate. It’s not easy to go straight from a scrum, to 40 metres upfield, then sprint to get off the line; but it grants results like this when it happens. Outstanding pressure by Scotland.

Now, speaking of the Scottish pack, let’s have a look at what made them dangerous when they got into these positions – specifically, let’s look at Louise McMillan’s opening try.

After a good run by Coreen Grant, Scotland recycle the ball quickly and set their shape perfectly. Konkel-Roberts takes the ball as lead carrier, with McMillan as her inside latcher and Rachel McLachlan as her outside tip-on.

What’s crucial to this try being scored, though, is Nelson in the boot. Nelson has played virtually everything through herself so far in the game – most phases result in the ball going through her hands, and she remains animated and loud in behind. Konkel-Roberts arcs outwardly as soon as she catches the ball, seemingly tucking the ball into her left arm.

But no – Konkel-Roberts isn’t tucking the ball, but instead twisting her entire body so she can shift the ball on to McLachlan, who is running a beautifully straight line. Because of the genuine threat of Nelson in the boot, Italy’s outside defender Gaia Maris (just in shot on the far right of the above picture) stands considerably wider than she normally would, allowing McLachlan much more space to run in.

McLachlan gets a 1v1 carry against Gaia Maris. She’s a tremendous physical presence, and it’s in Maris’ best interest to go low and get her to ground, and hope someone else can cover the offload.

McMillan runs a terrific support line – the space is on McLachlan’s right, but she anticipates the way Maris will tackle and runs the most convenient support line, allowing for the easiest offload. McMillan doesn’t need to run for the space on the right, because on the left she still only has Michela Sillari, a centre, to beat. McMillan backs herself to win the collision, drive Sillari back five metres and score – which is exactly what she does.

The headline of this try is the tip-on pass by Konkel-Roberts. Watch the try back and take note of her body language. It’s extremely convincing that she’s going to carry – and why wouldn’t she? She’s arguably the best carrier in the tournament. Nelson’s line and communication in the boot creates the slight disconnect from Maris, and Scotland link up brilliantly to score.

Scotland have always had the potential and the players to be a genuine threat in the Six Nations, and hopefully this is a sign that they are developing a strong kick pressure game. Look at how Wales benefited in their first two games from implementing a defensive game that doubled up as an attacking weapon.

There is rightfully a lot of talk about the Six Nations not yet being competitive enough – but if the Scottish defence can keep improving at the rate it has in the last two weeks, you’d hope they’ll pose more of a challenge to the top two in a couple of years. Above all, you’d hope to live in a world whereby Rachel Malcolm only ever sheds tears of joy post-match.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search