Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How Joe Schmidt's status quo decision could cost the Wallabies

Isaac Kailea and Allan Alaalatoa of the Wallabies celebrate victory during the men's International Test match between Australia Wallabies and Wales at Allianz Stadium on July 06, 2024 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

Joe Schmidt has called on the cavalry with big name signings and new overseas picks for his last Wallaby squad of 2024, but the propping stocks have received no such boost.

ADVERTISEMENT

Schmidt has brought in reinforcements in other troubled positions like second row, flyhalf, and centre but has refrained from bringing-in props to put pressure on his established front row stocks.

This decision, to stick with the status quo at prop, means rapid improvements are required if the Wallabies wish to avoid disaster on their grand slam tour.

This is because strong scrummagers await the Wallabies and although their scrum has been a real strength at times, their strengths must continue to improve as well as fixing their problems.

The last four Tests of the year present the team with an opportunity to bring all their lessons together, to ensure complete performances against the ‘home nations’ England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

This goal requires a strong set-piece, and the scrum is a crucial piece to the puzzle.

Starters Taniela Tupou and Angus Bell have successfully anchored the Wallaby scrum for 40-minutes at a time.

The drop off once the pair leaves the field is considerable and Schmidt has foregone the opportunity to shake things up.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alongside the starters, Schmidt has selected looseheads Isaac Aedo Kailea and James Slipper, as well as tightheads Allan Alaalatoa and Tom Robertson.

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
3
Draws
0
Wins
2
Average Points scored
29
24
First try wins
40%
Home team wins
40%

Kailea has had good form in his rookie Wallaby season, he provides the team with a strong ball running option, a staunch defender, and a decent scrummager.

Kailea had some decent early performances, but he must announce himself on the international stage during this tour because he seems to be the second-strongest loosehead scrummager in the squad.

It’s a big responsibility, resting on youthful shoulders, because apart from the first Bledisloe match, Slipper has struggled at scrum time.

ADVERTISEMENT

The young buck has the benefit of being under the tutelage of the ‘Scrum Doctor’ Mike Cron, as well as being able to lean on Slipper, the most capped Wallaby of all time, but all this must show for something in the coming weeks.

While it appears like a big load to put on such young shoulders, who else could Schmidt have turned to?

In the Australia XV team, Tom Lambert and Harry Hoopert are the only loosehead options, should a Wallaby go down.

Lambert is brutally short on game time, having been injured for much of the year, and Hoopert has only had a handful of games for the Western after returning from injury, with none featuring a dominant scrum performance.

The list of unavailable players doesn’t help Schmidt either: Alex Hodgman (family reasons), Harry Johnson-Holmes (Achilles), and Blake Schoupp (shoulder) are all unable to throw their hat in the ring for selection.

The reasons for not selecting Melbourne Rebel turned Queensland Red Matt Gibbon for Wallabies or Australia XV are a mystery, especially considering he had a strong Super campaign.

From an experience aspect, Hodgman is the only domestic player who could truly shift the dial.

Internationally, the clear and obvious choice would have been Exeter Chief and 69-cap Wallaby Scott Sio, who would add experience and strong competition to the young propping stocks.

The depth on the other side of the scrum is equally uncertain.

Despite some fitness issues and what appear to be confidence issues, Tupou has been the premier Wallaby tighthead by a country mile.

His raw power and explosiveness at scrum time has seen the Wallabies be able lean on the scrum in times of need.

The key for Schmidt and Cron on this tour will be to get the best out of Tupou, to fill him with confidence and to get him playing 50 minutes in every Test.

Increased minutes for Tupou is crucial as his deputy, Allan Alaalatoa, has struggled at scrum time since returning from a horror Achilles injury.

Getting 30 minutes of Alaalatoa’s typical high workrate in both defence and attack would serve the Wallabies well, especially if Tupou has taken the initial sting out of oppositions’ scrums in the second stanza.

After Alaalatoa, 31-cap Tom Robertson claims third spot, but he’s critically short on game time having only played a few games for the Force in October.

Again, looking at the Australia XV stocks and the options are thin: Rhys van Nek, Zane Nonggorr, and exciting youngster, Massimo De Lutiis.

Nonggorr is the only Wallaby capped member of the trio with 8-caps to his name, but the 23-year-old is not yet a force at scrum time, few tighthead-props are at this age.

Van Nek lacks unique size like Kailea or Tupou, and De Lutiis is building for Super Rugby.

Therefore, Alaalatoa is charged with large responsibility, for the Wallabies won’t be able to achieve success on their grand slam tour without a scrum that can compete for 80-minutes.

World-class scrummagers like Ireland’s Andrew Porter and Tadgh Furlong, England’s Joe Marler and Dan Cole, and Scotland’s Zander Fagerson and Pierre Schoeman await the Wallabies, and they will expose any weakness presented to them.

The Wallabies have an opportunity to weaponize their scrum with Bell and Tupou, but Cron must get another level out of Kailea and Alaalatoa.

Whereas new additions have seen players relegated in other positions, there is no such pressure being fabricated in the front-row stocks.

Schmidt has elected to stick with the players who carried him throughout the Rugby Championship and therefore, the pressure to push for better performances must come from himself, Cron, and from the props themselves.

The game of rugby is won and lost up front, and you can’t get any further forward than the front row.

Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for the latest episode of Walk the Talk to discuss his move to the NFL. Watch now on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
O
OJohn 26 days ago

But this is what kiwi coaches in Australia do. They will not put our strongest team on the field for obvious reasons. It's deliberate sabotage.

W
Willie 25 days ago

Go away Sook and find a few props with spines and a smidgeon of endurance.

m
mJ 26 days ago

AAA has struggled to compete for a few years in the scrum so much so the Brumbies rarely would look to compete with him if they knew they were up against any decent props. Now Slipper is struggling as well so doesn’t bode well when both sides are poor. They’re no bomb squad. Kailea is not a strong scrummager either. Showed some promise around the park but he is a long way off in the scrum. A fit Robertson is better in the scrum, not a big ball carrier but his defence is good and he works harder than any other Australian prop. One thing he does well which may not seem much is he’s quick to the tackle and gets the player quick to the ground so when he’s playing he sets up opportunities for pilfers.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search