Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How 'loved' Ellis Genge tactic ultimately left sour England taste

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

It was quite an eye-catching statistic, prop forward Ellis Genge emerging as the England player that made the most metres away to France other than Marcus Smith during last Saturday’s Guinness Six Nations defeat. The loosehead recorded 110 metres from his ten carries, a number that only out-half Smith eclipsed with his 154 metres from a dozen carries. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Midfielder Joe Marchant, with 106 from nine carries, was third-best overall on the list of the 22 England players who played in Paris while the next-best forward was Sam Simmonds with 70 metres from 14 carries. The numbers for the forwards then level off, with tighthead Will Stuart the next-best carrier with 37 metres from seven carries.  

Both Jim Hamilton and Andy Goode were enthused on this week’s edition of The Rugby Pod to see Genge show up in the backline running the ball back at the French, but that enthusiasm was tempered by the realisation that it highlighted how limited the England tactics were that they had to rely on a prop to run the ball back. There was also the issue that it sapped the front row’s energy when it came to his bread and butter of doing a job at the scrum.  

Video Spacer

Freddie Steward | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 26

We wrap up the Guinness Six Nations with England fullback Freddie Steward joining the show this week. We get their view on Italy’s historic win against Wales, Scotland’s disappointing performance in Dublin and France’s Grand Slam winning performance in Paris. Freddie tells us about his pre-match rituals, his England bestie, life in student digs, Pennyhill Park and which opposition player impressed him the most in the Six Nations.

Video Spacer

Freddie Steward | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 26

We wrap up the Guinness Six Nations with England fullback Freddie Steward joining the show this week. We get their view on Italy’s historic win against Wales, Scotland’s disappointing performance in Dublin and France’s Grand Slam winning performance in Paris. Freddie tells us about his pre-match rituals, his England bestie, life in student digs, Pennyhill Park and which opposition player impressed him the most in the Six Nations.

Hamilton kick-started the reflection on the show about the 25-13 Stade de France defeat, claiming he enjoyed the action he saw on TV from France before flying home from Ireland following the Triple Crown game versus Scotland.  

“That was a hell of a Test match and looking at it from my point of view at the airport in Dublin, it looked like the French had a couple of more gears. They never look like losing and that was the most impressive thing. England, I thought the game plan was great, I thought they were good… I thought they played well. Did you not?”

Goode didn’t agree. “Not until we are 18-6 down, no. They [France] should have carved us open. Had it not been a Grand Slam game and a bit of anxiousness around some of the passes… we could have been 20-odd points down at half-time… I thought 25-13, I am looking at it going in reality I reckon that is a 40 points to 13 game had France taken their opportunities.

“Eddie Jones’ tactics I think are really clueless. You have got players that are ripping it up in the Premiership in a certain way for their clubs. Stick them in an England shirt and it’s all about kicking. I have never seen Marcus Smith kick so much in all my life. Tactically I disagree with you, Jim. I thought we were inept at times.”

ADVERTISEMENT

This teed it up for Hamilton to come back in and steer the conversation to the England role played by Genge. “I am looking at it from that point of view where I thought the tactics, in my mind, were how I would have gone about it. Anyway, I was a forward, I enjoyed the game, I enjoyed the physicality. I thought Gengey was exceptional. 

“I loved the way how they used him in the backline. But you know what, that shows me the worry with England, the fact that you have got to use your loosehead prop. I know you play to your strengths but the fact was that there was no one else in that backline who could do what Gengey was doing in terms of carrying.” 

Goode didn’t agree that Genge was the only England forward capable of putting up a gallop. “I disagree with that. I loved the fact that they used Gengey back there but we used him all the time, so imagine your loosehead prop running it back and he made more metres than any other England player and then you ask him to go and scrum against the biggest tighthead in the world [Uini Atonio] and then we got a penalty given away at scrum time. Our scrum was under pressure. 

“Whereas I liked Gengey doing that, Sam Simmonds, look what Shaun Edwards said about him the other day, he is like a running back in the NFL so why didn’t they have Sam Simmonds back there as well, interchange him with Ellis Genge? Sam Simmonds is a devastating ball runner back. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“You are not going to run straight at someone and Gengey, all he was going to do was get the ball and run back at someone and he is going to get tackled. He is going to win the gain line. I saw Paul Willemse try to monster him, he’ll bounce one and someone else will take him down. 

“I thought it was great that he was back there for one or two occasions but you have sapped the complete energy out of him to do anything else. And this is the thing, you have got Sam Simmonds, you have got (Alex) Dombrandt…”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
l
lot 1004 days ago

did genges really get over the advantage line in those runs? french easily managed him with one defender... hid behind isiekwe on first run, defence pretty average. was ruck watching itoje then a late reckless clear out, lost possession. no where near the heavy traffic. likewise simmonds, a running back in the backs. not doing 8's core role. playing the 8 in the centres and looked pretty lost on defence out there on own 22. Not buying the hypes.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search