Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How Nathan Hughes reacted to his man of the match debut at Bath

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Former England No8 Nathan Hughes royally illustrated how he still has what it takes to shine at Gallagher Premiership level by producing a man of the match display just days after joining bottom club Bath from Bristol. Having been a mainstay of the Bears team during his first two years under Pat Pam, the 30-year-old has dramatically fallen down the pecking order this season.    

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite getting back into their Premiership team for the New Year’s Day game away to Exeter 14 weeks after his previous start in the league, Hughes wasn’t involved in Bristol’s recent Heineken Champions Cup games.

Instead, he found himself lining out last weekend for Hartpury College in their drawn Championship match versus London Scottish, an appearance that led to an enquiry from Bath about whether they could take Hughes on loan

Video Spacer

Saracens vs Bristol Bears – The Showdown 2

Video Spacer

Saracens vs Bristol Bears – The Showdown 2

Bristol boss Lam agreed, admitting: “It is important for Nate to get some regular quality game time at this stage of the season to enable him to get back to his best rugby,” 

It didn’t take Hughes long to return to his best, however, as a performance in which he made 48 metres from 13 carries, enjoyed six gainline successes, made six tackles and won one turnover ended with him receiving the man of the match award after bottom club Bath deservedly defeated visiting champions Harlequins.   

Naturally, he was chuffed with how it unfolded and he even hinted with a smile at the end of his post-game TV interview on BT Sport that a more permanent deal with Bath just might be something of interest given his current Bristol deal expires at the end of this season. “We built all this week and we talked about it as well, the boys have been through a tough season and stuff like that. They have drawn a line… what a way to get the win,” he enthused.  

“We knew against the wall there you had got to be patient. With Quins, fair play to them, they just kept coming and coming. What we talked about was staying patient… and we rode the wave, turned around and managed to get two tries, managed to get to win.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked what playing meant to him, Hughes added: “In rugby, we always like to play… I was just buzzing to come out here and perform. For me to perform with the boys and get the win it’s just a credit to them and we move on to Sarries next week.” 

The flash interview concluded with Hughes asking might he now look to stay at Bath long term. “We’ll see, we’ll see.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Very good, now we are getting somewhere (though you still didn't answer the question but as you're a South African I think we can all assume what the answer would be if you did lol)! Now let me ask you another question, and once you've answered that to yourself, you can ask yourself a followup question, to witch I'm intrigued to know the answer.


Well maybe more than a couple of questions, just to be clear. What exactly did this penalty stop you from doing the the first time that you want to try again? What was this offence that stopped you doing it? Then ask yourself how often would this occur in the game. Now, thinking about the regularity of it and compare it to how it was/would be used throughout the rest of the game (in cases other than the example you gave/didn't give for some unknown reason).


What sort of balance did you find?


Now, we don't want to complicate things further by bringing into the discussion points Bull raised like 'entirety' or 'replaced with a ruck', so instead I'll agree that if we use this article as a trigger to expanding our opinions/thoughts, why not allow a scrum to be reset if that is what they(you) want? Stopping the clock for it greatly removes the need to stop 5 minutes of scrum feeds happening. Fixing the law interpretations (not incorrectly rewarding the dominant team) and reducing the amount of offences that result in a penalty would greatly reduce the amount of repeat scrums in the first place. And now that refs a card happy, when a penalty offence is committed it's going to be far more likely it results in the loss of a player, then the loss of scrums completely and instead having a 15 on 13 advantage for the scrum dominant team to then run their opposition ragged. So why not take the scrum again (maybe you've already asked yourself that question by now)?


It will kind be like a Power Play in Hockey. Your outlook here is kind of going to depend on your understanding of what removing repeat scrums was put in place for, but I'm happy the need for it is gone in a new world order. As I've said on every discussion on this topic, scrums are great, it is just what they result in that hasn't been. Remove the real problem and scrum all you like. The All Blacks will love zapping that energy out of teams.

160 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Three winners, three losers from the England Six Nations squad reveal Three winners, three losers from the England Six Nations squad reveal
Search