Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How rugby is shaping up for its return to action despite Covid-19

By PA
(Photo by Malcolm Couzens/Getty Images)

England’s top rugby clubs have been given the go-ahead to resume training under certain conditions during Covid-19. Here, the PA news agency looks in detail at how the sport is dealing with the coronavirus pandemic.

ADVERTISEMENT

Who can now train?

England’s Premiership and Championship clubs have been handed provisional approval to begin non-contact training from the Premiership Rugby professional game board. Clubs must educate all players and support staff to ensure they can make an informed decision on whether to restart training.

English rugby clubs must also appoint a Covid-19 manager and a medical lead, set out hygiene standards for training facilities, provide appropriate personal protective equipment and conduct daily screening, including temperature checks. Stage one protocols allow for individuals or small groups to train in the same facility, while adhering to social distancing rules. No timescale has been set for a return to contact training or games.

Video Spacer

RugbyPass brings you the latest episode of The Breakdown, the Sky NZ TV rugby programme

Video Spacer

RugbyPass brings you the latest episode of The Breakdown, the Sky NZ TV rugby programme

What club competitions plan to restart?

The domestic season in England below the Gallagher Premiership was ended by the Rugby Football Union in March while Scottish and Welsh domestic competitions were all cancelled. No date has been set for a resumption of the Premiership.

The Guinness PRO14 is provisionally scheduled to return on August 22-23 with two meetings between Irish provinces at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin, but plans for the completion of the season are complicated by the fact the tournament is played in Scotland, Wales, Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Italy and South Africa.

The European rugby body is committed to finishing the Heineken Champions Cup and Challenge Cup, which are both at the quarter-final stage, with provisional finals dates pencilled in for October 16-17. Talks are also continuing on a revamped format for next season’s competitions.

What about the international scene?

There are four Guinness Six Nations games outstanding involving all of the teams. All summer tours, including England’s trip to Japan, were cancelled.

ADVERTISEMENT

There remains doubt over the inter-hemisphere November Test series but it is hoped international rugby will take place later in the year, including a truncated version of the Rugby Championship featuring Australia, New Zealand, Argentina and South Africa.

World Rugby also called time on its Under-20 Championship, which was scheduled in Italy this summer, while the postponement of the Olympics affected sevens tournaments.

Is any rugby union starting soon?

The southern hemisphere’s Super Rugby is due to begin in New Zealand on June 13. Australia is scheduled to follow in July with South Africa looking at plans for a domestic rugby tournament when government Covid-19 restrictions allow.

ADVERTISEMENT

What is the financial impact?

Rugby Australia this week axed 47 of 147 full-time posts plus 30 casual workers and contractors. Professional players, coaches and staff across the home nations have taken pay cuts and some have been furloughed. The already precarious USA Rugby filed for bankruptcy.

There are major concerns over the impact of internationals being postponed later in the year. RFU chief executive Bill Sweeney stated that the English union stood to lose £122million if there were no matches at Twickenham in 2020 and predicted a six-year process “to get rugby back fully on its feet”.

How can the game adapt to the ‘new normal’?

The sport faces heightened challenges in implementing social distancing and World Rugby has suggested a number of optional law changes during the crisis. The aim is to limit scrum contact and time, lower the tackle height and speed up ball distribution from rucks and mauls.

The trials provide limits to scrum options with no scrum resets, limits for players joining rucks and mauls, time to play the ball at the base of scrums and rucks reduced from five to three seconds and only one movement permitted for a maul. However, the RFU has declared it will create its own guidelines for clubs.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 16 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

303 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search