Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How the All Blacks have changed philosophically since the Ireland series

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

The All Blacks escaped with a last-gasp win in Melbourne to avoid a third defeat in this year’s Rugby Championship, but despite the up-and-down results, the All Blacks attack has been improving rapidly since the Ireland series.

ADVERTISEMENT

The biggest difference has been the evolution of the kicking game and a change in risk appetite to a level now that is currently the highest tolerance for risk in test rugby.

The All Blacks have seemingly adopted the mantra of ‘no risk, no reward’ in rebuilding themselves as an attacking juggernaut once again.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

They have scored 92 points over the last two tests as their new plans come into fruition.

Along with much better fundamentals, the attack has opened up to score 19 tries, the most of any team in this Rugby Championship tournament, and the tries per game average has improved to 3.8.

Back in July, the third test 32-22 loss to Ireland in Wellington featured three largely individual tries by the All Blacks, a pick-and-go to Ardie Savea, a strong carry by Akira Ioane and a breakaway run by Will Jordan.

Outside of those moments, the phase play languished around one out carries and the team failed to open up Ireland with orchestrated ball movement, often went backwards and failed to create many line breaks through team play.

The ruck was inefficient and the side became bogged down by a lack of sharp fundamentals in the shapes and patterns they tried to run over the final two tests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Admittedly, Ireland’s defence was top draw and the All Blacks haven’t seen as a defence as suffocating since, but they were guilty of getting one dimensional themselves.

The Rugby Championship has seen a more explosive All Black side, in part because of their willingness to use any part of the field to attack space on offer, a stark contrast to the conservatism that had crept into their game in the Irish series.

The sea change came at Ellis Park as the All Blacks opted to attack wide out of their own end and executed well. They tried at times in Mbombela but handling let them down.

ADVERTISEMENT

The tactic is a rare sight in test rugby these days as most teams have no desire to attack from deep inside their own 22.

Whilst they haven’t attempted to exit by running every single time, they have continued to keep that option open whilst adding a wide variety of exit kicks that target different zones.

The All Blacks have used box kicks, high bombs, cross field kicks, grubbers and chips all from different players coming out of their own exit zone.

The primary objective of most of the kicks has been to keep the ball in play and secondly, regain possession with the chance to then attack off the back of that with the defence scrambling.

Aaron Smith, Jordie and Beauden Barrett, David Havili, Richie Mo’unga and perhaps most importantly, Will Jordan, have all been used as kicking options.

Having skillful kickers at 9, 10, 12, 15 and 14 with both long and short dabs in their arsenal has spread out the load and means that there is no predictability in the All Blacks exit plan anymore.

That nearly every player can kick means that they can explore the run first and take the kicking option second once the space disappears.

The first exit in the second half in Melbourne saw Beauden Barrett use a cross field kick to get the ball into the hands of Jordan, who kicked deep once his space was closed down.

The entire defence and backfield pendulum is forced to work harder to cover as a result.

On this occasion the strong kick chase trapped and turned Wallabies fullback Kellaway, and the All Blacks scored a try off the breakdown steal through Samisoni Taukei’aho moments later.

The picture that Barrett saw once he had the ball was enticing with a three-on-one overlap outside lock Jed Holloway (4) and two of the All Blacks fastest men in Rieko Ioane and Will Jordan.

This is a common sight as the defensive line is usually undermanned during exit scenarios as they prepare for the kick with an extra man in the backfield.

At this level, teams are also not used to actually having to defend the edge in this zone as no one tends to go there.

The All Blacks have found the confidence to attack the space offered in that zone regularly.

Allowing Jordan, the last man on the edge, to make the kick decision stretches defences more than they have bargained for.

They are short of numbers but if they don’t cover him, he will burn them.

The All Blacks have trusted Jordan’s decision-making to run when the space is there and put boot to ball when it isn’t, and he has shown good selection with both short and long options that hit the turf.

Jordan’s kicking has only backfired once this season, early in the second half in Mbombela against South Africa when he lined a fly ball out on the full.

The genesis of this tactic came from last November’s test in Dublin against Ireland where the right wing pulled off a 70-metre try after placing a perfect chip kick on the right edge over the oncoming Irish defender.

In a game where they struggled to make in-roads in the 29-20 loss, that flash of brilliance was a highlight. Hitting the edge from deep has now become a regular option for the All Blacks.

Ioane at centre has come to the table with a much better distribution game in the last couple of months, making massive strides as a ball playing 13 that can hold space for Jordan on the outside.

If Jordan did not have the kicking game that he has shown, the All Blacks would not be able to manage the risk as effectively when going to the right edge.

He gives the side the best of both worlds in the No 14 jersey with a solid kicking game and allows them to stretch the field when the opposition is weakest out wide.

That is not the only area where the kicking game has been integral.

Instead of bashing into a wall for too long in the midfield zones, the generals have been utilising short attacking kicks to pepper the space in behind with precision over the last two tests.

The accuracy of Mo’unga, Havili and Barrett with their kicking combined with the speed of the likes of Will Jordan on a kick chase has been a major problem for the opposition.

This style of play also suits the Crusaders pair Mo’unga and Havili, giving them a chance to utilise their strengths.

This multi-faceted kicking strategy has paid dividends, particularly in the wet against Argentina with three tries coming off the back of regathered kicks but again in Melbourne with another two.

Barrett combined beautifully with Jordan for a try in Melbourne off a chip kick, the Crusaders fullback caught the ball in open space and weaved his way around Kellaway and burnt the cover defence.

It is the third time Australia have been exposed in this fashion by Beauden Barrett in the last few seasons without a consistent sweeper.

In 2020 he had a chip kick for Mo’unga in Sydney for a long break away try and last year in Perth his left foot grubber was gathered by Jordan before his brother Jordie finished the passage.

The attacking kicks have continually found their mark and the All Blacks have turned into the best kicking team in the world over the last two months with four quality kicking options outside the halfback.

When Beauden Barrett enters off the bench at either first five or fullback, they still have four, and right now it is causing headaches for their Rugby Championship rivals.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
R
Roy 777 days ago

France, England and Ireland have first class kicking games that have won them tests for the last 2 years... A couple of games and ABs have the best kicking game in the world? Don't make me laugh. Such fan boy nonesense once again. Let's see how it develops and how other teams adapt.

The other teams beat teams with their kicking game when the other teams know it's coming.. Doh.

A top class kicking game goes hand in hand with a top class chase game and then suffocating defense, which is how France get on the front foot, and they've honed this tactic over the last 2-3 years. England got to the last final with this strategy and Ireland beat you using this strategy... Show some respect for other teams you AB fan boy

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 777 days ago

Poor BS at it again: one presumably cannot fault him for trying. One cannot, much less an entire group of persons, change "philosophically" in less than two months of time. One could change personnel in that time, especially bracketing those players who like to beat up and harass women in their off time, but that would be too "radical" for the almighty ABs.

a
andy 778 days ago

That unfortunately why RTS won’t make xv no kick game yet

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 47 minutes ago
'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

4 Go to comments
N
Nickers 56 minutes ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Very poor understanding of what's going on and 0 ability to read. When I say playing behind the gain line you take this to mean all off-loads and site times we are playing in front of the gain line???


Every time we play a lot of rugby behind the gain line (for clarity, meaning trying to build an attack and use width without front foot ball 5m+ behind the most recent breakdown) we go backwards and turn the ball over in some way. Every time a player is tackled behind the most recent breakdown you need more and more people to clear out because your forwards have to go back around the corner, whereas opposition players can keep moving forward. Eventually you run out of either players to clear out or players to pass to and the result in a big net loss of territory and often a turnover. You may have witnessed that 20+ times in the game against England. This is a particularly dumb idea inside your own 40m which is where, for some reason, we are most likely to employ it.


The very best ABs teams never built an identity around attacking from poor positions. The DC era team was known for being the team that kicked the most. To engineer field position and apply pressure, and create broken play to counter attack. This current team is not differentiating between when a defence has lost it's structure and there are opportunities, and when they are completely set and there is nothing on. The reason they are going for 30 minute + periods in every game without scoring a single point, even against Japan and a poor Australian team, is because they are playing most of their rugby on the back foot in the wrong half.

43 Go to comments
N
Nickers 1 hour ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

I thought we made a lot of progress against that type of defence by the WC last year. Lots of direct running and punching holes rather than using width. Against that type of defence I think you have to be looking to kick on first phase when you have front foot ball which we did relatively successfully. We are playing a lot of rugby behind the gain line at the moment. They are looking for those little interchanges for soft shoulders and fast ball or off loads but it regularly turns into them battering away with slow ball and going backwards, then putting in a very rushed kick under huge pressure.


JB brought that dimension when he first moved into 12 a couple of years ago but he's definitely not been at his best this year. I don't know if it is because he is being asked to play a narrow role, or carrying a niggle or two, but he does not look confident to me. He had that clean break on the weekend and stood there like he was a prop who found himself in open space and didn't know what to do with the ball. He is still a good first phase ball carrier though, they use him a lot off the line out to set up fast clean ball, but I don't think anyone is particularly clear on what they are supposed to do at that point. He was used really successfully as a second playmaker last year but I don't think he's been at that role once this year. He is a triple threat player but playing a very 1 dimensional role at the moment. He and Reiko have been absolutely rock solid on defence which is why I don't think there will be too much experimentation or changes there.

43 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Marcus Smith on that substitution and his England plea Marcus Smith on that substitution and his England plea
Search