Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How the All Blacks reacted to Uruguay's 'same scoreline' loss to France

Ardie Savea and company at All Blacks training. Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images

Uruguay made a statement in their opening match of the Rugby World Cup, pushing the tournament hosts right into the last quarter until France pulled away with two late tries.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a performance that made the All Blacks, Los Teros’ next opponent, wary.

Since that match, Uruguay have split their Pool A contests, having fallen after leading Italy at halftime before out-lasting Namibia.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The France Test though is what has put the All Blacks on edge.

“We are playing against a team that basically had the same scoreline against France as what we did,” All Blacks head coach Ian Foster told media ahead of the final round of pool play. “And that’s in the last month.

“I am not trying to talk them up falsely but they lost to France by the same scoreline we did. That deserves a lot of respect and if you watch that game, these guys, I love their attitude. I think they’re a really passionate rugby team and if we’re not in the house, then we are going to struggle. That’s a fact we’ve got to deal with.

“For us, we are at our best when we are on edge. Sometimes our opponent puts us on edge, sometimes the situation puts you on edge but at all times your own internal standards have to be the edge that really matters the most.”

Scrum coach Greg Feek echoed those sentiments on the eve of the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

“As a team, we were sitting watching that game. Obviously, we were curious to see how they went,” he said. “That was part of what got us excited and made us go, ‘we can’t get complacent in this tournament against anyone we play’.

“We talked about it the other day, how many turnovers they get at breakdowns, how physical they are and even some of their backs, quite electric too. So, we’ve done our homework. We have to.”

Related

New Zealand’s loss to France was the first pool-stage loss the country has suffered at a World Cup and reports suggest it added a combative edge to team training.

Pushes and shoves were reported at a feisty training camp in Bordeaux during the team’s bye week. The 96-17 win over Italy that followed would imply the intensity of training had served the team well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Feek said the vibe in training had evened out into a clinical focus.

“So, at training at the end we do some skill blocks and the boys do some work-ons… and even in those, there’s the focus, the intensity in some of those drills. It shows they are really trying to get that little bit extra to prove themselves, you know.

“The good thing about that is you’ve got that competitiveness, but you’ve also got the guys that are competing for spots helping each other. When you see the boys working together like that, wanting each other to get better, it proves, I suppose, where we sit with everything. That gets me excited, the boys get excited and we know that whoever gets the jersey is going to do the business.”

Fixture
Rugby World Cup
New Zealand
73 - 0
Full-time
Uruguay
All Stats and Data

Having ruthlessly put to rest any thoughts of an upset against Italy, the New Zealand side says building on that momentum is their key ambition.

“From last week, the standard that we set around a number of areas, getting some continuity with that, first and foremost. That in itself will give the boys confidence, will cement a few things, so we will get some more rhythm going.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
France outwrestle All Blacks in titanic Test for one-point win

Yeah nar I pretty much agree with that sentiment, wasn't just about the lineout though.


Yeah, I think it's the future of SR, even TRC. Graham above just now posting about how good a night it was with a dbl header of ENGvSA and NZvFrance, and now I don't want to kick SA or Argentina out of TRC but it would be great if in this next of the woods 2 more top teams could come in to create more of these sort of nights (for rugby's appeal). Often Arg and SA and both travel here and you get those games but more often doesn't work out right.


Obviously a long way off but USA and Japan are the obvious two. First thing we need to do is get Eddie Jones kicked out of Japan so they can start improving again and then get a couple of US teams in SRP (even if one its just a US based and augmented Jaguares).


It will start off the whole conferences are crap debate again (which I will continue to argue vehemently against), but imagine a 6 team Pacific conference, Tokyo Sunwolves (drafted from Tokyo JRLO teams), Tokyo All Stars (made up of best remaining foreign players and overseas drafts), ALL Nihon (best of local non Tokyo based talent, inc China/Korea etc, with mainland Japan), a could of West Coast american franchises and perhaps a second self PI driven Hawai'i based team, or Jagaures. So I see a short NFL like 3 or 4 month comp as fitting best, maybe not even a full round, NZvAUSvPAC, all games taking place within a 6hr window. Model for NZ will definitely still require a competitive and funded NPC!


On the Crusaders, I liked last years ending with Grace on the bench (ovbiously form dependent but thats how it ended) and Lio-Willie at 8. I could have Blackadder trying to be a 7 but think balance will be used with him at 6 and Kellow as 7. Scott Barrett is an international 6 sized player. It is just NZ style/model that pushes him into the tight, I reckon he'd be a great loose player, and saders have Strange and Cahill as bigger players (plus that change could draw someone like Darry back). Same with Haig now, hes not grown yet but Barrett hight and been playing 6, now that the Highlanders have only chosen two locks he'll be playing lock, and that is going to change his growth trajectory massively, rather than seeing him grow like an International 6.

61 Go to comments
T
Tom 1 hour ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

Interesting post. I realise that try was down to Marcus Smith not Slade, this is why I mentioned that England's attack is completely reliant on Smith working miracles. Just wanted to highlight that Slade's little touch was classy and most English players would have cocked it up. Earl has gas, he's very athletic but Underhill is nailed on at 7 in my eyes though. They both need to be on the pitch so we need a tall 6 or 8 to complement them which we have in CCS and potentially Ollie Chessum. We also have young Henry Pollock who may be the 7 by the world cup.


The whole attack needs an overhaul but Richard Wigglesworth our attack coach was a very limited scrum half who excelled at box kicking and had no running game. Spent most of his career with Saracens who mauled, defended and set pieced their way to victory.... Which might have been ok if Felix Jones hadn't quit and been replaced by a guy who coaches Oyonnax who have one of the worst defences in the French 2nd division. I'm not too emotionally invested in England right now because this coaching setup isn't capable of winning anything.


England had no attack when they were winning under Eddie either. They battered teams with huge dominant tackles and won from pressure. The last time England had any creativity in attack was the Stuart Lancaster/Mike Catt era. They played some fantastic attacking rugby but results were mediocre, lots of 2nd place finishes in the 6N although it felt like we were building something special until we got brutally dumped out of our home world cup in the pool stage.

8 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

8 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Rassie Erasmus pinpoints what made the difference in tight Bok win Rassie Erasmus pinpoints what made the difference in tight Bok win
Search