Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How the Crusaders blew a golden opportunity to make a statement

Scott Robertson celebrates after the Crusaders success in the 2019 Super Rugby final. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer / Getty Images)

Rugby is far more than a game to New Zealanders.

From the All Blacks, through to club and school teams, the game genuinely brings communities together. It’s not just about the fun and fellowship, but self-esteem too.

Rugby, and in particular the All Blacks, makes people feel good about themselves. It helps them feel as if New Zealand matters and that people across the globe know who we are and where we are.

We might only be small, and rather out of the way, but we sure are good at rugby.

Rugby’s often good for us too. In recent years New Zealand Rugby (NZR) has done fine work in the areas of mental health and inclusivity; they’ve raised the profile of female players and promoted worthy causes such as the proper pronunciation of people’s names and awareness of concussion.

So they should, obviously. With privilege comes responsibility and nothing holds a more exalted position in New Zealand than rugby.

Again, in many instances, the game is a force for good and we are a better, more tolerant society for it. But NZR and the Crusaders failed a few people last Friday.

Given an opportunity to lead and to live up to the ideals many of us hold, they chose to settle for convention. To give the illusion that they cared about the death of 51 innocent Cantabrians, when all they were actually doing was looking after their name.

March 15 this year was one of the sadder days in New Zealand history. People, many of whom weren’t born here but chose this as a safe haven, were slaughtered while going about their daily business.

Without wanting to get too melodramatic about it, there’s New Zealand before those March 15 mosque shootings and then there’s New Zealand after it. Rightly or wrongly, we always told ourselves those were acts that occurred elsewhere, but not here.

ADVERTISEMENT
The new Crusaders logo.

No, we’re much too accepting of difference for that.

This is where rugby had a chance to play its part. To make a stand and to educate others.

Instead, the Crusaders, and NZR, were blinded by a brand.

People might be dead, but we won’t sacrifice the Crusaders’ name under any circumstances, no matter how upsetting or extraordinary.

And so we had last week’s unedifying spectacle, during which Crusaders chief executive Colin Mansbridge insisted the franchise’s name had many, many meanings; just not the one it’s always been associated with.

Sword-wielding knights on horseback has always been the Crusaders’ schtick. Long before Scott Robertson was break dancing, title-winning Crusaders coaches plunged a sword into the playing surface to signify their conquest.

Mansbridge maintained that all the franchise had ever crusaded for was tolerance and a fair go for all, but we all know he’s drawing a long bow there.

Instead of justifying a name made distasteful by March’s events, Mansbridge and company might have really gone and done something to promote tolerance in Christchurch and beyond. Sadly, the best he could do was make a bizarre comparison between the franchise’s “crusade” for social justice and that of suffragette Kate Sheppard.

If rugby weren’t a big deal in this country, then maybe little of this would matter. But it’s not. It’s the biggest deal going and people are entitled to expect the game to often do things for the greater good.

Changing the name of the Crusaders would have sent an undeniable message that rugby takes its status seriously, that it’s conscious of the ways in which the game matters to New Zealanders and is willing to make difficult decisions for all of our benefit.

NZR and the Crusaders couldn’t, this time, and it’ll be fascinating to see how many people come to hold that against them.

Ardie Savea is out for six months:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 1 hour ago
'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

4 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Everyone is saying the same thing after agonising England loss Everyone is saying the same thing after agonising England loss
Search