Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How the Wallabies can expose England’s oppressive linespeed

Noah Lolesio of the Wallabies takes possession of the ball during The Rugby Championship match between Australia Wallabies and South Africa Springboks at Suncorp Stadium on August 10, 2024 in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Morgan Hancock/Getty Images)

The Wallabies will face their old foe England in the first Test of their grand slam tour, and those wearing the white jerseys will look to swarm the gold ones from the first whistle.

ADVERTISEMENT

England’s defensive line speed was aggressive and quick against the All Blacks last weekend and it caused the Kiwis a great deal of trouble, but the defensive system comes with a cost.

The English forwards were carrying heavy legs in the final quarter of the first half and the line speed never regathered its potency as the game drew on, this intel must shape how and where the Wallabies attack.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The Wallabies must be patient enough to wait for the fatigue to set in.

A key aspect of a rush defence is that it requires numbers to do it, rushing with a blatant overlap is not a sound tactic, nor is it something England do.

However, the numbers must come from somewhere and the English don’t fold as much as other sides do to cover the short side.

Often there’s only three players, usually including a tight-five forward, to defend a blindside which is up to 20-metres long.

This aspect of the English game presented itself as early as the sixth minute in last Saturday’s game.

ABs intial space

ADVERTISEMENT

Here, hooker Jaime George, lock George Martin, and inside centre Ollie Lawrence can be seen covering 20-plus metres.

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
3
Draws
0
Wins
2
Average Points scored
30
24
First try wins
40%
Home team wins
40%

Had Beauden Barrett switched to the blindside with halfback Cortez Ratima and flyer Reiko Ioane, the All Blacks likely would have made good ground, if not scoring a try.

Barrett sees this space but it isn’t until 20-minutes later that the All Blacks decide to expose this defensive habit and it results in a try for Will Jordan, who scores virtually untouched from 30-metres out.

ABs try

Prop Ellis Genge, winger Immanuel Feyi-Waboso, and fullback George Furbank are again covering a 20-metre blindside against Calbe Clarke, Jordan, and Barrett.

ADVERTISEMENT

There must be two key take aways from these clips, first, England do indeed sacrifice numbers on the short side to stack their openside defence to allow the rush.

Second, the one place the English defence is most vulnerable is around the ruck.

In any defensive system, the pillar and post, who are the closest defenders to the ruck on either side, should never move.

Their job is to defend against a scooting halfback or an attacker coming back against the grain.

Related

Genge, in the clip above takes the bait and leaves his post to chase Barrett, had he stayed, he would have likely nailed Jordan.

However, he drifts from his post and Jordan goes through.

This is not the rule, it’s the exception, but the point is: no matter what defensive system is being run, you can guarantee the two men immediately next to the ruck are instructed to stay.

The All Blacks exposed both the distribution of players in England’s defensive pattern as explored above and the stagnant defenders around the ruck more often as the game went on.

The English defence comes up-and-in, like an umbrella, forcing players inward, as well as making aggressive tackles from the outside-in, this also draws on numbers who would otherwise be realigning to defend the next phase.

ABs inside pass 2

Here’s an example of the All Blacks using their forward pod to tip inwards rather than outwards.

This exposes the stagnant defensive alignment of the pillar and post-defenders identified earlier in the piece.

Scott Barrett tip-passes inside to Tyrell Lomax who then offloads to Cam Roigard.

English reserve prop, Fin Baxter, in jersey 17 is the pillar defender and because he must stay next to the ruck a three-metre gap between created between him and the rushing Alex Dombrandt in jersey 20.

It’s this gap which the All Blacks target and the one the Wallabies should look to utilise as well.

Had Barrett carried this ball, he would have been caught five metres behind the gainline, instead, the All Blacks set a ruck five metres over the gainline.

In the next clip, the All Blacks repeatedly attack the space closest to the ruck, and because the English tackle from the outside-in, it eventually creates an overlap that the All Blacks expose.

ABs three lessons

The All Blacks pull all their lessons from throughout the game into this sequence of phased and pick-apart the English defence.

First, Tamati Williams tips inside to Scott Barrett which narrows the English defence on the short side.

Next, Jordan runs a tight line between two defenders which pulls Henry Slade from the outside to make the hit with Chandler Cunningham-South.

Finally, Feyi-Waboso is outnumbered on the blind side three-to-one, but he stays in system to a fault and rushes Barrett who gets the ball quickly to his two-man overlap.

The All Blacks make 15-metres just by allowing England’s defence to run its pattern.

These are all valuable lessons for the Wallabies and they must learn from them.

The Wallabies must weather the initial storm of the English rush defence during the first 30 minutes.

It will be an attritional period of the game where they must look to play territory, but learning from the All Blacks’s game is crucial.

Whoever wears the no.10 jersey for the Wallabies must also resist the mirage of space on the outside of the umbrella defence and look inwards.

Little kicks like chips and grubbers can work for variation’s sake but the Wallabies must invite the English defence to rush-up, to achieve the tiring effect as seen in the All Blacks’ game.

Patience is key as even Beauden Barrett was caught almost 20-metres behind the gainline on a couple of occasions, with few options but to carry into contact to secure possession or to hoist a rushed kick for little gain.

The no.10 must also resist playing deeper to give himself more time, the ABs tried this and gained very little.

Changing the point of attack from the openside to the blindside like Barrett did for Jordan’s try is another tactic which could work well.

Noah Lolesio has done this on several occasions for the Wallabies and ACT Brumbies.

It also worked for Ben Donaldson against Argentina earlier in the year, which is a team that also runs a rush defence.

Big ball carriers in-tight will also be crucial to the Wallabies’ hopes of starting the game well but there may be scope to bring in some their strike weapons later in the piece as well.

The All Blacks played their towering lock Patrick Tuipulotu off the bench, and he secured great gainline metres and attracted several English defenders with his carries in the second half.

Joe Schmidt would have taken note of this, and it could be a role for Will Skelton.

The vigour of the English starters may not allow Skelton to get up a head of steam and could nullify his impact.

Regardless of who is selected where, the Wallabies must be ready to go head-to-head with England, because they must tire them out like the ABs did.

The Wallabies are big outsiders for this clash but with the added reinforcements as well as the continued time together in camp, the Wallabies may just surprise the English with their newfound discipline in their game.

The Wallabies can achieve what the All Blacks did as long as they don’t get flustered and acknowledge the storm will pass.

Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for the latest episode of Walk the Talk to discuss his move to the NFL. Watch now on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
m
mJ 44 days ago

The selected side isn’t going to bother England. That’s a very ordinary Wallabies side, let’s be honest with few form players and little X factor. Locks, halves and back three only just Super Rugby quality at best. And Schmidt is now sticking with these guys, worrying times. Bet the tactics along with the selection is poor as well. Schmidt is living in the past.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search