Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How Wasps' ground share news has been received by football club's fans

Wasps (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Wasps’ potential move to The Valley in a ground share with League One’s Charlton Athletic has been met with fear by the football club’s fans over the damage it could do to the pitch.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was reported by The Times last week that Wasps, who went into administration in 2022, “are believed to have secured use of The Valley — where a new hybrid pitch has been laid — as they eye a return to competition ‘at the highest possible level'”.

This move would be ahead of a potential return to action for Wasps next season in the Championship, with the league set to be expanded to 14 teams.

Video Spacer

Rassie Erasmus on how Tony Brown made them respect the All Blacks

Video Spacer

Rassie Erasmus on how Tony Brown made them respect the All Blacks

It was also reported that the two-time European champions still harbour ambitions to build a stadium in Sevenoaks in Kent.

Sharing a stadium is familiar territory for Wasps, who had played at Queens Park Rangers’ Loftus Road, Wycombe Wanderers’ Adams Park and Coventry City’s Coventry Building Society Arena in the professional era. Charlton too have shared their ground with Super League’s London Broncos in the past.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Newcastle
3 - 24
Full-time
Bristol
All Stats and Data

Wasps’ plans were recently discussed on the Charlton Live podcast, where host Louis Mendez said that the story has been “overblown” and that “there might not be much to it”.

The greatest fear for fellow podcaster Mark Newbury is the damage a rugby union side could do to the pitch- a new hybrid surface that has only been laid for this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It seems strange that we’d spend money putting a new surface in and then let someone say ‘oh yeah let’s play some rugby on it’,” he said.

“I don’t think it’ll happen. It may have been one of those things that people put out there as a taster to see what the feedback would be.

“I don’t know much about Wasps’ home crowd, whether they would suddenly bring in two, three, four, five thousand or whether the club would say if you’ve got a season ticket you get half-price tickets or something. It’s a stadium which needs to make money so I would rather if they did want to do something they would put a concert on or something.

“But as for the rugby, I can’t see it and if it were Wasps, again you’ve got to look at the long-term planning and go ‘we’ve got a lovely pitch, would that affect us?’ Because I don’t think they’d be happy if we’d have to re-lay it halfway through a season – you know how our winters get here – and not be playable and we have to call games off, which would be embarrassing for a club of our nature.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So I think it was one of those ones put out there to get a tickle to see if anyone was interested and pick up some feedback for free. I can’t see it, so I wouldn’t start worrying about it now, to be honest.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
C
Chief Brody 102 days ago

Worrying about your pitch should be the least of your worries Charlton, the Pests will likely swarm in and try to replace you at your own stadium, Wasps by name, Wasps by nature, be very careful if I were you. 👕 PUSB

T
TH 101 days ago

I am totally against Wasps eentering talks of groundshare. They must be made to pay their creditors and then start at the bottom of the rugby pyramid. Wasps have history talk to those who invested in their share issue whilst in Coventry.

F
FM 103 days ago

That fella who's been quoted is a right cocky shit, Wasps won the Premiership cup in 2008. Wtf has Charlton ever done? Wasps' average attendance in the last season they played was just under 10k, while Charlton FC are at 13k. How would Wasps playing there and almost doubling the number of people who would go be a bad thing? I know they wouldn't get those numbers straight away, but give Wasps a season or two, and they'd be back in the Premiership and getting those numbers in no time.

K
KS 104 days ago

Charlton need to be very careful, and talk to the many clubs Wasps f'ed over and lied to around Coventry

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 34 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search