Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Hurricanes player ratings vs Chiefs | Super Rugby Aotearoa

(Photo by Masanori Udagawa/Getty Images)

You could smell the desperation in the air at Sky Stadium in Wellington on Mana Moana night. The 0 and 2 Hurricanes and the Chiefs sitting on an 11 loss streak; both needed a victory but “there could be only one”.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Canes threw Orbyn Leger into the fray and partnered him with Luke Campbell in the inside backs. Xavier Numia and Salesi Rayasi got his first starts for the season.

The home team was 26-7 ahead at halftime and could only conjure up 3 points in the second half as they folded, the Chiefs gobbling them up 35-29.

Video Spacer

Le Crunch reaction with Neil Back | Offload Episode 21

Video Spacer

Le Crunch reaction with Neil Back | Offload Episode 21

Here’re the Hurricanes’ ratings.

1. Xavier Numia – 5.5

Busy outing around the field, scrumming needs a bit of work to give him a regular start. Nice ball out the back in the lead up to Riccitelli try and didn’t miss a tackle. 53rd minute penalised at attacking scrum although great analysis from Kane Hames spelt out that he was robbed by Ta’avao. Pinged at the tackle a minute later and that seemed to prompt his substitution.

2. Ricky Riccitelli – 6

Had a very strong game. Lineout was potent, especially his combination with Blackwell. Chugging down the touchline and got up a good head of steam to bounce off two tackles for the try. Was there again in the 33rd minute running off Ardie’s shoulder for some good yards. Pinged 65th minute for offside at lineout, there will be discussion on that one. Off at 70.

3. Tyrel Lomax – 5.5

ADVERTISEMENT

Couldn’t make much headway in scrums against Ross.  Couple of good runs, broke the line in 10th minute. Off 61.

4. James Blackwell— 6

Was the lineout banker for the Canes with 8 soaring takes off the top. Sloppy delivery in the 2nd minute but smooth from there. 14 tackles and sweet ball 37th minute on attack that led to Rayasi’s 2nd try.

5. Isaia Walker-Leawere- 5.5

The big unit was not asked to jump much at lineout time but tireless around the paddock. Awesome turnover on Cane in the 21st minute. Played halfback on attack to Rayasi’s 2nd try. Smart work in the 47th minute with a lineout maul turnover.

6. Reed Princep- 5.5

ADVERTISEMENT

Top tackler in the game and a couple of good lineout takes. Nasty high tackle at 40th minute, couldn’t stop the change of momentum in the 2nd half.

7. Du’Plessis Kirifi – 6

Ultimate pinball bouncing into and off people on and off the ball. His physicality gets into people’s heads as we saw with the little off the ball action he got from Jacobson. Had a little burst in the 49th minute but more of a defensive effort. Off at 61.

8. Ardie Savea – 6.5

Good stats with decent yards, high tackles and turnovers. Missed Taukei’aho on the inside shoulder on Trask try. He was heart broken at fulltime and questions will have to be asked about the team leadership as the Hurricanes melted.

9. Luke Campbell – 5.5

First up knock on after some sloppy lineout ball. Showed greased lightening shoes to beat Trask and DMac to the line for the first try in the 12th minute. Off at 65.

10. Orbyn Leger – 5

He is a very good all round player and didn’t embarrass himself but he struggled at ten to drive the team and was found out a few times in kicking for position.

11. Salesi Rayasi – 7

It’s hard to understand why his team didn’t get more ball to him on the left wing. Four touches for two tries. Didn’t touch the ball til the 21st minute, a moment later scored from the Laumape cross kick. Also was looking for work on the right when he put a little shimmy on ALB in the 50th. His defence was good too, he was the top tackling back for the game; a great save on Weber at halftime and then in the 2nd half on Mitch Brown and DMac to deny a try.

12. Ngani Laumape – 6

Had a good first hour but looked injured in the last stages which seemed to affect his team. Good to see move beyond one dimension; he had top yards for his team but the way he set up the Riccitelli try was promising, probably his instinct was to tuck it under the wing and have a go but threw a nice pass to the hooker. Then a creative cross kick to Rayasi for the collection and try. Was also very busy in defence, 13 tackles.

13. Billy Proctor – 5

Is a good foil for all the strong running Canes backs. Good work over the ball to garner a penalty in the first minute. Off 57.

14. Julian Savea – 5

Couldn’t really get into the game although we saw his aerial and distribution expertise a couple of times. Off at 70.

15. Jordie Barrett- 6.5

He’s like a reincarnation of Don Clarke. Big, strong and determined he rocket launches his punts and place kicks. A slippery break around ALB to set up Campbell’s try. Commits hard in defence; he smashed Taukei’aho in the 12th minute but came in a bit hot in the 57th minute tackle on Dmac, missed him and that led to Weber try. Frustrated at the end, holding on at the breakdown to concede the last penalty.

Reserves:

16. James O’Reilly- 4

On 70. The bench in general lacked energy when compared with their opposites.

17. Fraser Armstrong- 4

On at 55.

18. Tevita Mafileo – 4

On at 61. Pinged for high tackle 63rd minute.

19. Liam Mitchell – 4

On at 73.

20. Devan Flanders – 4.5

On 61. Dagger like run first up but quiet after that.

21. Jonathan Taumateine – 4

On 65. Had to make last tackles on the last two Chiefs’ tries and gave away possession at a crucial time.

22. Peter Umaga-Jensen -4

On at 57.

23. Wes Goosen- 4.5

On at 70. Got a Chiefs necktie from Tupaea first up to give the Canes a penalty.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 18 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search