Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Hurricanes spent years assembling a championship roster and about five minutes dismantling it

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Things have gone badly astray at the Hurricanes.

Fair play to Moana Pasifika. It remains to be seen if results, such as last week’s 24-19 win over the Hurricanes, can become a regular occurrence but it certainly augurs well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Competitions can’t sustain foregone conclusions. You need unpredictability and, let’s face it, no-one saw that Hurricanes defeat coming.

But should we have? Should we have looked at the playing and personnel decisions made by the Hurricanes in recent seasons and suspected that a defeat like this was possible?

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 6

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 6

Should we have already wondered aloud about the sense of dispensing with someone such as Danny Toala – who scored Friday’s matchwinner – while retaining the consistently underwhelming Billy Proctor?

Should we ask questions about the coaching of the side and cite Xavier Numia and Alex Fidow as examples of promising players who can’t seem to improve at the Hurricanes?

Should we question the signing of others, such as Julian Savea, Owen Franks and TJ Perenara, whose best days are behind them?

Should we wonder if appointing Jason Holland as head coach was a good idea, given all his previous experience was as an understudy?

ADVERTISEMENT

Should we, going back a way, again ask if jettisoning Chris Boyd was really such a good idea, when it was clear John Plumtree had coaching aspirations at a higher level?

People ask me what’s wrong with Super Rugby? Why isn’t the product what it was?

There’s a few reasons, obviously, but the one I consistently come back to is the premature departure of players.

Let’s just use the Hurricanes as an example.

Yes, they have one or two injuries and, yes, they probably looked at Moana Pasifika as easybeats and an opportunity to rest some frontliners.

But the Hurricanes, and frankly most New Zealand franchises for that matter, no longer have the depth to roll out a competitive team of dirtrackers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Off the top of my head, the Hurricanes have in recent times let go of players such as Vince Aso, Beauden Barrett, Otere Black, Finlay Christie, Gareth Evans, Michael Fatialofa, Vaea
Fifita, Jamison Gibson-Park, Willis Halaholo, Sam Lousi, Matt Proctor, Brad Shields, Te Toiroa Tahuriorangi, Jeff To’omaga-Allen, Jason Woodward and Ihaia West.

There are others, but those are just the ones who sprung to mind.

Not many of them are world-beaters, but it is that tier of talent that rugby in New Zealand so badly misses. Guys who can come in when there’s injuries or some All Blacks who need a rest, and maintain standards.

Players who are seasoned Super Rugby performers, with the potential to maybe even play test footy at some point.

I won’t name and shame some of the younger players who pulled on the Hurricanes’ jumper against Moana Pasifika last week, but few of them are fit to lace the boots of those other blokes.

I get that the contracting model makes things hard and that guys will leave franchises for money or the opportunity to play more minutes. But when you repeatedly rip the guts out of these Super Rugby teams, standards will slip.

In the Hurricanes’ case, they spent years trying to assemble a championship roster and about five minutes dismantling it.

Moana Pasifika could become the best thing to happen to Super Rugby in ages. If they can become a genuine vehicle for Pacific rugby and attract more players to play international footy for Samoa and Tonga rather than New Zealand, then we’ll all benefit.

But that will take time and you fear Moana Pasifika will be gone from the competition long before their potential is realised.

As for this season, they’re a start-up, facing huge challenges and trying to combat those without a particularly deep pool of talent.

The effort and desire to do well is clearly there, but some weeks they’ll simply be outmatched by superior teams.

We all sympathise with what Moana Pasifika is up against and will accept their results accordingly.

Unfortunately for the Hurricanes, there’s no such excuses for the state they’ve got themselves in.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
S
Spew_81 1001 days ago

At least they're moving on from Jackson Garden-Bachop. Garden-Bachop is relatively solid tradesman at 10. But he is never going to be top level. Also Garden-Bachop's style of play doesn't suit the Hurricanes, who play a fast and loose style of play.

I'm really looking forward to seeing how: Ruben Love and Aidan Morgan develop. They seem to be well suited to the Hurricanes.

P
Peter 1001 days ago

Many of the Moana Pasifika players come from Hawkes Bay, the Hurricanes chose not to select them. History repeats, it used to be Taranaki players who were overlooked.

f
flyinginsectshrimp 1001 days ago

Did the Hurricanes let those players go, or did they choose to leave for a multitude of reasons?

What good is it to live in the past? Sure, we can reflect on some of those coaching and squad decision but dwelling on them will get us nowhere. All it'll do is provide content for low quality articles that highlight obvious issues but don't propose helpful solutions.

Why are the Crusaders so successful? Consider poaching a senior leader to implement their model.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 9 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search