Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Hurricanes under 'the most pressure' in tense final rounds before playoffs

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

There are three rounds of Super Rugby Pacific separating us from the playoffs, and those three rounds offer remarkably different challenges for each of the teams looking to make a run towards the finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

As it currently stands, there are five teams in a tier above the rest; the Chiefs sit atop the table with the Brumbies five points behind, the Crusaders and Hurricanes both sit four points further down and the Blues are fifth, enjoying a somewhat comfortable cushion over the sixth-placed Waratahs.

Looking at schedule difficulty based on the opponent’s record, the Hurricanes’ remaining schedule is by far the most challenging. The Wellington team face the Chiefs, the Blues and finally, the Crusaders to round out their 2023 regular season.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“You would think those four sides, the Chiefs, Crusaders, Brumbies and the Hurricanes should make up that top four,” Justin Marshall told The Platform. “The biggest vulnerability I can see is the Hurricanes.

“Having three New Zealand franchises; that physicality, that intensity, knowing each other so well, they’re the team that’s got the most pressure on them.”

The Platform host Martin Devlin agreed with the take, adding the Wellington side have got “effectively three final matches before they would play their first finals match.

“Sense and sensibility would suggest that they might actually drop to four or five.”

Related

Resting three of his All Blacks this week to ensure his best side is fit and available for the finals push, Hurricanes head coach Jason Holland is hoping to secure a home quarterfinal after briefly enjoying the No 1 seed earlier in the season.  The Hurricanes will need to win two of their final three matches to do so.

ADVERTISEMENT

Marshall also offered his preferred finals matchup, unsurprisingly naming the six-time defending champion Crusaders and the table-topping Chiefs as his predicted championship contenders, provided the two avoid each other throughout the quarter and semifinals.

“I think they’re probably the two best sides in the competition at the moment.

“I certainly think that the Blues have the firepower, but they’re just not playing as well as those other two teams.

“Equally, I think the Hurricanes are a very capable side, you’ve just got to think about their forward pack, is it as strong as the Blues, Chiefs and Crusaders when it comes down to knockout rugby? I certainly think their backline is playing well enough.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Even though the Crusaders lost twice to the Chiefs, they were intense, high-quality games. Those two teams for me, if they met in the final, I tell you what, everyone would be pretty happy because it’ll be one hell of a final.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 26 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search