Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Hurt’ All Blacks hungry to bounce back from France defeat

The New Zealand team look on after Melvyn Jaminet of France celebrates scoring his team's second try during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between France and New Zealand at Stade de France on September 08, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

The All Blacks are hurting after losing to France in last week’s Rugby World Cup opener, and they’re hungry for revenge ahead of a pool clash with Namibia in Toulouse.

ADVERTISEMENT

When the full-time siren sounded at Stade de France, the All Blacks and their fans dropped their heads. They’d just lost a Rugby World Cup pool game for the first time ever.

New Zealand were blown off the park by a clinical Les Bleus outfit who, led by goal-kicking ace Thomas Ramos, scored 18 unanswered points in just over 25 minutes.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But the All Blacks must find a way to bounce back, there’s simply no other option – their World Cup dream depends on it. They’ll finish pool play with must-win Tests against Namibia, Italy and Uruguay.

Two days out from their clash with Namibia, wing Caleb Clarke repeated a sentence that his father Eroni – who also played rugby for New Zealand – “always said” about a struggling All Blacks side.

“Definitely. A lot of us are hurt. It was a good training week so not to get what we wanted dampened the spirits,” Clarke told reports on Wednesday.

“My dad always said, ‘a hurt All Blacks team is a dangerous All Blacks team’. This week everyone has been on edge and training has gone really well.

Fixture
Rugby World Cup
New Zealand
71 - 3
Full-time
Namibia
All Stats and Data

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think everyone is excited for the challenge ahead this week.”

It’s often said that playing for New Zealand “demands everything” of those deemed fit enough to wear the coveted black jersey in the Test arena.

The men and women who represented the rugby-mad nation on the international stage are looked to almost as Gods, and that creates a sense of pressure, expectation and scrutiny.

That’s why the alarm bells started to ring after losing to France.

The All Blacks have been left in unfamiliar territory. They’d never lost a pool game before, and that presents its own challenges.

Namibia, along with the matches against Italy and Uruguay, is now a must-win Test. There are no second chances.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks have approached the clash with Namibia with both respect and confidence. Coach Ian Foster has selected a star-studded side to take on the African nation, which includes an electric backline.

Bolstered by an exciting new-look halves duo of Cam Roigard and Damian McKenzie, Clarke will line up on the right wing while Leicester Fainga’anuku takes his place on the left.

“It doesn’t really matter who you put out in the 23. The black jersey we’re blessed to wear demands everything and (it’s) something we pride ourselves on.

“We want to win games to get ourselves a playoff spot and give us the best shot of winning this World Cup. The competition is awesome – to be able to train week-in, week-out with the best talent in New Zealand.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
F
Flatcoat 464 days ago

So now we measure ourselves against Namibia...a complete waste of time..Southland would be a stronger opponent..this will really prepare us for the qusrter final.

N
Nigel 464 days ago

Ireland vs Romania type score I suspect.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 31 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search