Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

I can't believe that this is what rugby in New Zealand has come to

(Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)

I can’t believe that this is what rugby in New Zealand has come to.

ADVERTISEMENT

Actually, that’s a lie.

Mils Muliaina’s comment that it would be acceptable for the All Blacks to lose to Scotland, on their upcoming tour, is the sadly inevitable conclusion of years of New Zealand Rugby (NZR) arrogance and neglect.

Results don’t matter anymore. Frankly they haven’t for years.

If they did, then Ian Foster would’ve been sacked as All Blacks coach a long time ago.

No, the NZR board have made it abundantly clear that excellence is no longer the expectation for our national side and that there are no consequences for losing.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

They’re just happy to muddle along, beating bad teams more often than not and having our pants pulled down by the good ones.

But that’s them. That’s an NZR board hardly overflowing with rugby expertise.

They all mean well, but they don’t have any real skin in the game.

Muliaina does. He’s one of those guys that dug the well, who created the aura of invincibility that NZR and the current All Blacks still trade off.

Muliaina played in some average All Blacks teams earlier in his career. He felt the pain of failure.

ADVERTISEMENT

But now he reckons that’s okay. That losing, for developmental purposes, is no big deal.

I don’t want to round on Muliaina. I’ve nothing against him personally and, in fact, I feel he’s entitled to his point of view, because he’s been there and done that and we haven’t.

But I am saddened by it, if not surprised.

We have become conditioned to mediocrity to the point where even decorated All Blacks believe that defeat to ordinary teams, such as Scotland, is okay.

Did you ever think you’d live to see the day?

I mean, ruin club rugby if you must. Rob provincial footy of all its meaning if you have to. Tinker with Super Rugby until it becomes an irrelevance, but don’t muck around with our All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

And yet that’s where we are, with our flagship team now playing inconsequential friendly games – call them exhibition or trial matches if you like – in the name of building depth for the future.

A future of what exactly? A future where the All Blacks win half their matches each year and don’t get out of the pool stage of the Rugby World Cup?

No, thanks.

You expect this kind of stuff from NZR, but surely not from a man who helped build an All Blacks brand that seems to diminish in value by the day.

While we’re on value, I’ll look forward to a reduction in the price of test match tickets and my pay TV subscription. If results don’t matter, then surely you can’t charge as much for the product?

Call me selfish, but I liked it when losses were unacceptable. I liked it when players, coaches and administrators lived in fear of the axe. I liked it when we held these people to account and when they were conscious of the legacy they were charged with upholding and protecting.

Failure was unacceptable and inexcusable.

Was that way of thinking right? Were our expectations unrealistic? Did we heap too much pressure upon people?

Maybe.

But it also built teams that were the envy and benchmark for codes all over the world.

We’re not that anymore. Not even close.

We’ve dropped our standards, we don’t insist upon excellence anymore, we routinely allow players to put themselves ahead of the jersey. Heck, we even put sabbaticals into contracts as a sweetener.

We’ve lost to Argentina, so what’s the big deal about losing to Scotland too?

But why stop there? How about Italy one day? Japan? Georgia?

As long as we’re building depth and combinations, who cares if we lose?

We used to demand better than that. We don’t now.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
C
Charlie 786 days ago

Exactly right Hamish, saw Muliana make the comment and I was deeply disappointed.. as you state correctly the NZR is responsible along with Foster for lowering the publics expectations and the All Black standards, and this is what we get, losing to Ireland in NZ, losing a series to Ireland in NZ, losing to Argentina over there then in NZ.. and allowing 2/3 tier teams to score tries against the ABs when they never have before... NZR still needs to get rid of Foster and they need to get real passionate rugby people on the Board, not pretend rugby people more interested in the business and net working opportunities of rugby rather that the game. Mules, give yourself an uppercut..

W
Wes 787 days ago

I can't believe Rugby Pass published this tripe. No respect for the advancement of the sport in other regions of the world. Just a constant whining about how bad the New Zealand governing organization is. Get a life dude. Sports is supposed to be exciting and unpredictable. It is healthiest when many teams can compete based on talent and desire. Rugby is in a good place right now from a competitive standpoint. Enjoy the drama. Even the Scotland/NZ game. It might be fun to watch.

k
kingsiey 787 days ago

I’m with you Hamish. I couldn’t believe what I heard. That is what this coaching team and nzru board has allowed to happen.

J
Jaxon 787 days ago

Northern hemisphere nations are well and truly ahead of our game. Quality players in abundance

We’ve bled more players through injury then trust. So when is a good time to bleed them without losing a game?

We’re in 2022 still trialing 15/10 the BB Mo’unga show.

C
CRZ38L 787 days ago

No empire lasts forever Hamish. Have you ever though that other nations are finally coming up to even standing with the ABs, if not better? Ireland is a case in point.

Go to Bunnings, buy some wood, build a bridge and get over it.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search