Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I just find that so frustrating and ignorant' - Williams debunks Cullen myth

Leo Cullen /PA

Rugby pundit Matt Williams has decried the ‘ridiculous fallacy’ around Leinster head coach Leo Cullen, who he rates as one of the best indigenous Irish coaches of the professional era.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leinster hammered Bath 64 – 7 in another masterful Heineken Champions Cup performance, a result which could see them through to next round despite the fact that were forced to ship a 28 – 0 loss on paper after their second round clash with Montpellier was cancelled by the EPCR.

Leinster are on fire again in Europe and the bookies have made them favorites for the competition, ahead of fellow European heavyweights Toulouse, Racing 92 and La Rochelle.

Yet despite their triumphs, the soft-spoken Cullen remains a relatively uncelebrated figure despite being the top dog in arguably Ireland’s most successful sporting franchise.

Former Scotland coach turned commentator Williams suggested there’s a perception that the Cullen regime at the province is coat-tailing on the coaching of Stuart Lancaster – an idea he describes as ‘ignorant’.

“He is probably the most outstanding indigenous Irish coach of the professional era as far as results go, cups and trophies in cabinets,” Cullen said on Virgin Sport. “There is this ridiculous fallacy that he sits up in his office drinking coffee and Stuart [Lancaster] does all the coaching. I just find that so frustrating and ignorant.”

Cullen, who won 221 caps for Leinster and was captain of three Heineken Cup-winning squads, took over as head coach at the start of the 2015/16 season, a period in which the province won four Pro14s and a Heineken Champions Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He pulls that coaching team together to win games. He has got his own style of doing that. To think that Leo doesn’t know what is going on or someone else is running it, that’s just plain ignorance.

“There are a whole load of ways to coach. Rod Macqueen and Ian McGeechan, they weren’t technically on the field doing it, they had other like Jim Telford doing all the technical work for McGeechan.

“There are a whole lot of ways up the mountain. He has taken that team in a way up the mountain that is quite brilliant. He deserves a lot more praise from the Irish public.”

Cullen signed a one-year rolling contract extension last March. Leinster chief executive Mick Dawson confirmed the club had offered Cullen a two-year deal, which he did not take up for personal reasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search