Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I just want everyone to know we got his back': Ardie Savea on head coach Ian Foster

(Photo by Sydney Seshibedi/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

All Blacks No 8 Ardie Savea has thrown his support behind Ian Foster ‘100 per cent’ after the All Blacks secured a 35-23 win over the Springboks at Ellis Park in Johannesburg.

ADVERTISEMENT

After a 26-10 defeat to South Africa last week, the visitors were under siege for the latest string of results which saw the side slip to a worst-ever fifth place in the World rankings.

When asked if the improved performance by the team was for Ian Foster, Savea explained that it was for everyone but he personally supports his head coach unequivocally.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

“It was for all of us, but for me personally that is for my coach,” Savea told media in the post-match press conference.

“I back him 100 per cent side-by-side. He’s been under a lot of pressure but I know Foz doesn’t want to make it about himself.

“I just want everyone to know we got his back, all the players have got his back. He’s a great coach, got great coaches beside him so we back him 100 per cent.

“I hope everyone that listens, that reads this, back us, because we gone get it.”

The No 8 had a fast start into the game by breaking away down the left hand side after a cross field kick by David Havili, he busted through the tackle of Jesse Kriel on the outside and almost went the distance.

ADVERTISEMENT

An infringement at the ruck by fullback Damian Willemse led to a yellow card but the All Blacks could not capitalise with 14 men as the Springboks held ground and kept them out.

The All Blacks also showed desperation in defence with a cover tackle by Jordie Barrett on Pieter-Steph du Toit saving a would-be try at the other end shortly after.

Savea said the desperation of the side played a part in turning round the result, with the forwards stepping up to nullify the Springboks’ pack.

“I think it was probably our desperation and our want in the boys to go out there and perform,” Savea said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We knew that our forward pack had to front up in order for us to get the W.

“We knew they were going to drive and come at us and we felt like we nullified that a little bit.

“I’m just pleased after everything that has been going on to come away with the boys and get the win.”

The All Blacks showed improvement in all the areas they had troubled with in Neilsprit, with the elevation of Ethan de Groot and Tyrel Lomax to the starting side helping shore up the scrum.

The Springboks pulled third string hooker Joseph Dweba off after just 29 minutes to try and gain back some ascendency at the set-piece while all the South African prop replacements came on with five minutes remaining in the first half.

They also showed improvement in the aerial game with Jordie Barrett getting some assistance from the ground to catch the high balls safely, while the All Blacks’ attack sparked into life with the promotion of Richie Mo’unga at No 10.

In the quest for answers, Savea said the internal belief never wavered in the face of adversity and the building pressure surrounding the team ended up bringing the best out of the side.

“We always believe in each other. I feel like the last couple weeks this team has been through some adversity,” he said.

“I feel like, in life and in sport, when you go through adversity it brings the best out of people.

“I saw something from you saying that belief only takes us so far during the week. [Belief] took us pretty far this week.

“I’m just proud of everyone in this team to be able to step up, especially at Ellis Park, it’s bloody hard. I’m tired, knackered, can’t wait to hit the sack.”

Savea was measured in declaring this game the turning point for the embattled All Blacks looking to climb back up the global standings but said it was a building block and a start.

“It’s a start. The boys are chuffed, they are stoked to get the W, but in the back of our mind it is only a start,” he said.

“Hopefully we can build on this, take confidence out of what we’ve done. Jason[Ryan’s] done an amazing job of coming in and directing our forward pack.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Poorfour 54 minutes ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sky Sports commentator on why Wallabies players are outplaying All Blacks counterparts Sky commentator on why Wallabies players are outplaying All Blacks
Search