Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Black wing George Bridge on his 'forced' decision to leave New Zealand

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

All Blacks wing George Bridge has opened up his call to finish his New Zealand rugby career ahead of Canterbury’s NPC final against Wellington in Christchurch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bridge hopes to help Canterbury to another provincial title to finish off a 10-year stint in Christchurch ahead of his move to France with Top 14 heavyweights Montpellier.

He has signed a three-year deal with the French club and will join for the 2022-23 season which has already commenced.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The 27-year-old said the decision to leave was made for him after missing out on both Crusaders and All Blacks selection this year after a rocky end to the 2021 season.

Young Tasman teammate Leicester Fainga’anuku surpassed Bridge at the Crusaders for the left wing starting role, while Fainga’anuku and Blues wing Caleb Clarke were the two selections by the All Blacks.

“I knew the position I was in,” Bridge told the media at Canterbury training.

“You can’t really dwell on not making teams, the only thing you can do is concentrate on what’s next.”

The Crusaders fourth all-time try scorer had sights on making a second Rugby World Cup with the All Blacks after breaking into the side on the eve of the 2019 World Cup in Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

After a shock 47-26 loss to the Wallabies in Perth during the 2019 Rugby Championship, incumbent wingers Rieko Ioane and Ben Smith paid the price by losing their starting roles to Crusaders pair Bridge and Sevu Reece.

Bridge played one Bledisloe test before starting on the left wing for the All Blacks in their big World Cup clashes, the pool stage win over the Springboks, the quarter-final win over Ireland and the semi-final defeat to England.

“To be honest, the goal was to be going to the World Cup next year,” he said.

“Obviously, things didn’t pan out that way, but that’s just the nature of professional sport.”

Bridge played just one test in 2020 against the Wallabies in Wellington before succumbing to a season-ending injury in the reduced Covid year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Returning in 2021, Bridge featured in eight tests but indifferent form saw him fall down the pecking order in 2022, missing Ian Foster’s July squad to play Ireland.

The 19-test All Black made the ‘really tough’ decision to take up an offer now before the market is potentially flooded with the end of the World Cup cycle and post-World Cup departures.

“The decision to go overseas was really tough, because of that goal that I wanted to get to, but at the end of the day, you’ve got to make the best of what you can,” Bridge said.

“It was a decision sort of made for me, rather than sticking around and potentially putting myself in a worse position next year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 28 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search