Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I never understood the vendetta against Farrell' - Saracens star lauded

Owen Farrell - Press Association

Oft the villain on social media, England and Saracens star won rare praise on Twitter after putting in a masterful performance in the Challenge Cup against Cardiff this afternoon.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sarries eventually got over the line with a 40-33 victory over the Welsh region and the England man was front and centre, pulling the strings for Mark McCall’s side.

The flyhalf who has just regained fitness in recent weeks after months out with an ankle injury, caught the eye not least for some remarkable hand skills.

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath | A story following Italy as they take on the mighty All Blacks | A Rugby Originals Documentary

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath | A story following Italy as they take on the mighty All Blacks | A Rugby Originals Documentary

A subline try assist via an out-the-back door offload to winger Max Malins was the high point of the game for Farrell.

Popular content creator Squidge Rugby wrote: “Owen Farrell is an all-time great and it’s really boring when people pretend otherwise.”

Rugby Youtuber Andrew Forde wrote: “I still don’t think I’ll ever truly understand the vendetta against Owen Farrell. He’s absolutely class and I think the only reason he isn’t rated as highly as he is, is because of his nationality.”

The 30-year-old missed England’s Guinness Six Nations campaign, where Harlequins’ young gun Marcus Smith shone in his absence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet in contrast to Farrell, it was a rather difficult weekend for the Quins playmaker, who missed a relatively easy conversion that would have bagged his side a Heineken Champions Cup quarter-final berth.

The mixed fortunes of the pair weren’t missed on social either.

The question for Eddie Jones heading into the summer series against Australia must surely now be: does he continue developing Smith as his starting 10 on tour, or does he bring in the veteran Farrell either at flyhalf or playing 12 outside Smith.

What is abundantly clear is that Farrell still has a huge amount to offer England, wherever he is picked to play.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
A
Anthony 978 days ago

Farrell is a fantastic player who continually improves his skill set. Smith is a fantastic player at a much earlier stage of his career who also wants to learn and improve his great natural skill set. His blunder on one conversion -it can happen to anyone - is highlighted here. His previous brilliant pass which led to the try isn't -rather pathetic in that it was directly comparable to Farrells superb sleight of hand.
For me England needs both players - I wouldn't have the temerity to advise Eddie Jones how to use them :-)

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search