Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France
PWR

'I think I’ve gained their trust': Saracens starlet Amelia MacDougall on breakout season

BARNET, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 23: Amelia MacDougall of Saracens during the Allianz Premiership Women's Rugby match between Saracens and Bristol Bears at StoneX Stadium on December 23, 2023 in Barnet, England. (Photo by Henry Browne/Getty Images)

Should Amelia MacDougall continue on the impressive trajectory of her breakthrough season with Saracens then her father, Malcolm may come to regret one promise he made his talented daughter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much to the chagrin of her mother, Patricia, MacDougall has got a burgeoning collection of tattoos and celebrated her call-up to the England squad for last year’s Six Nations Under-18s Women’s Festival by getting ’11:11’ inked onto her left wrist.

An ‘angel number’, the digits held special significance to MacDougall, who would make a wish to play for England whenever she saw them.

Video Spacer

Abbie Ward: Bump in the Road | trailer

Bump in the Road explores the challenges faced by professional female athletes and all working mothers, featuring England lock, Abbie Ward. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Abbie Ward: Bump in the Road | trailer

Bump in the Road explores the challenges faced by professional female athletes and all working mothers, featuring England lock, Abbie Ward. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Selection for last April’s festival in Berkshire heralded the realisation of that dream, and so the young playmaker thought it was only right that she marked her achievement.

“It’s a bit cringe but I got it before the Under-18s Six Nations,” MacDougall tells RugbyPass, pointing to the black digits imprinted on her wrist.

“I’ve always wanted to play for England and even if that’s in age-grade rugby, I always wanted to do that, and I’ve always wished to play.

“So, when I found out I was going to be involved I got this 11:11 tattoo.”

MacDougall admits mum Trish is “not a massive fan” but it transpires lawyer dad Malcolm has committed to visiting a tattoo parlour if his daughter achieves her ultimate dream of playing a senior Test for England.

ADVERTISEMENT

“My dad said if I get a cap for the Red Roses, he’s going to get a tattoo and he absolutely hates tattoos,” MacDougall adds, laughing.

There is no suggestion MacDougall senior needs to rush out and book an appointment just yet, but with every assured performance for England U20 and accomplished cameo for Saracens, his date with the stencil edges ever closer.

“That is motivation,” Amelia admits with a broad smile.

Ahead of this season, MacDougall’s first in senior women’s rugby, she did not expect to feature in Alex Austerberry’s first-team plans at Saracens as much as she has done.

However, Holly Aitchison’s departure to Bristol last summer and a serious injury to Zoe Harrison provided the opportunity which MacDougall has grasped with two hands.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having made her senior debut in the Allianz Cup in September, MacDougall started the opening match of the Premiership Women’s Rugby (PWR) season in the red and black number 10 jersey.

Since then, she has proved herself to be both a capable understudy to England playmaker Harrison and a safe pair of hands at 12.

It was no surprise, therefore, to see MacDougall thrust into the action with around 10 minutes to go of a tense, tight encounter with the previously unbeaten Gloucester-Hartpury last Saturday lunchtime. Playing alongside Harrison at inside-centre, she helped get Saracens over the line.

“Coming straight from junior rugby to senior rugby is a massive step up,” MacDougall says. “But every time I put the shirt on, I try to get the trust of our coaches.

“Because that’s the main thing you need to get as a young player, is their trust. So, I just try to do as much as I can for the squad every time I put the shirt on and I think I’ve gained their trust a bit more over the last few months.”

At the end of April, MacDougall collected the first winner’s medal of her burgeoning career, starting at fly-half and kicking six points to help steer Saracens to a 31-17 defeat of Bristol Bears in the Allianz Cup final.

While victory was a fitting send off for club legend Sonia Green, it was proof too that with MacDougall, half-back partner Tori Sellors, prop Chloe Flanagan and others, the future looks bright.

Fixture
PWR
Loughborough Lightning
24 - 33
Full-time
Saracens Women
All Stats and Data

“It was just such an amazing feeling,” MacDougall says about lifting her first piece of silverware.

“I wasn’t on the pitch when the final whistle went but running on to everyone when we knew we had won was just a great feeling.”

MacDougall lined up in that final inside former Red Rose Sarah McKenna, who is also her England U20 backs coach, while her time on the pitch this season has been spent in the company of some of the country’s best centres and half-backs.

Leanne Infante, Ella Wyrwas, Harrison and Sophie Bridger are just some of the Test players who have been on hand to help MacDougall settle into life as a PWR player.

“It’s so good. The development of my game has just gone up so much,” the 19-year-old says.

“Having Sarah outside me and Leanne or Ella inside me at nine just makes me feel way more comfortable and makes me feel way more confident in my decisions. Knowing that they’re going to back me no matter what I do, it’s really nice.”

MacDougall admits having that support has enabled her to make the step up from age-grade rugby to pulling the strings for one of the biggest clubs in the country.

“At Sarries, you’re kind of the new one there and you’re young, you don’t have the experience that the players around you do,” she adds.

“So, there’s that bit more pressure on you but as I said, the people around you make it so much easier to not feel that pressure.”

That helping hand has extended to the training pitch. “If I’ve got any questions, they’re always open to talking to me and making me feel like no question’s a stupid question,” MacDougall says.

“A lot of them have been in the same situation as I have. Zoe was really young when she came in to Sarries as well.

“They’ve all been in the same boat as I am now, so they’re just trying to make the jump a bit easier, and they make me feel more confident.”

Although she can play at 10 or 12, MacDougall sees herself as a fly-half. So, is there a particular playmaker she models her game on?

“I don’t want this to be a cop out,” MacDougall stresses as she begins her answer. “But genuinely, I’d like to be a player that is like a mixture between Holly and Zoe.

“Obviously, Zoe’s game management and her kicking is just amazing, so I’d like to have that in my game but Holly’s pass and acceleration off the mark are also things I really want to have in my game.

“To spot a gap and just to be able to run through it. So, a bit of both really, that would probably be my ideal.”

Related

Game management is certainly something MacDougall has been able to work on under the guidance of Harrison since the England fly-half returned to fitness.

Asked what advice her senior colleague has given her, MacDougall replies: “Just to keep calm.

“You want to service the people around you, so you don’t always need to be in the forefront of doing things. Let your forwards do the carrying, you want to be on feet as much as possible.

“So, just distributing a lot more and playing in the right areas of the pitch. You don’t want to be cramped in your 22 for too long. Obviously, if it’s on to play, then you want to play but if you’ve gone through the phases a few times in your 22, you want to exit that.

“So, yeah, game management is mainly the thing that I’ve developed over the last few months the most with Zoe being around.”

Playing and training with some of the best players in England – Red Roses captain Marlie Packer is of course another team-mate – can only make MacDougall’s dreams appear more achievable.

Yet, the player herself is not getting carried away. “One day hopefully I’ll be able to get into a Red Roses camp and try to put my best foot forward,” she says.

“Obviously Zoe is an amazing 10 so trying to get her shirt off her won’t be easy at all. But at the moment, I’m just trying to focus on improving as a player, I think that’s all I can really do.

“Try and make myself the best player I possibly can be to then make myself be in the best position I can be to get picked for more games… I don’t like trying to think into the future too much but I definitely want to be in the Red Roses squad at some point.”

Should MacDougall make the step up to the senior England squad then it would be the culmination of a dream that began when she followed her dad and two brothers down to Bramley Sports Ground, home of Saracens Amateur RFC, when she was six.

In her own words, she is “Sarries through and through” but there was a time not so long ago when it looked as though her sporting future might lie with a different shape ball.

MacDougall was part of Tottenham’s academy and a good enough prospect for the Women’s Super League club that a decision had to be made about where to concentrate her energies.

Fortunately, for Saracens, and potentially England, there was only ever likely to be one outcome.

“Rugby and football have always been a big part of my life. I still love football but obviously you can’t really do both at the same time, so I had to pick one and I just love rugby so much,” MacDougall explains.

“I’m happy with the decision I made. I just felt like the feeling that I got playing football never compared to the feeling that I got when I was playing rugby.

“Scoring a try [compared] to scoring a goal; scoring a try, I don’t know how to explain it, but it just felt so much nicer, so much better and just the community around rugby was so much nicer.

“I just really enjoyed the team I was in and the people I was around.”

So far, it seems that football’s loss has very much been rugby’s gain and MacDougall’s maiden season in the Saracens first team could yet end with more silverware.

Last weekend’s victory against the champions could prove a considerable psychological blow coming only a fortnight out from the semi-finals.

Saracens and MacDougall round off their regular season campaign with a trip to Loughborough on Sunday and they know they are potentially only 240 minutes away from a domestic double.

“Obviously, to win the Prem Cup and the Prem would be a great season,” MacDougall says. “I’m going to do everything I can to put the squad in the best place for that.

“I’m just going to help where I can, to push the squad and see what happens from there.”

If MacDougall and Saracens are celebrating again come the PWR final on 22 June, then maybe dad Malcolm will need to start thinking about potential tattoo designs.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
B
Brian 199 days ago

She has a good sense of the perfect fly half but I agree with her mother about the disfiguring tattoos. I shall watch her progress with interest.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 16 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

46 Go to comments
f
fl 31 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

46 Go to comments
J
JW 34 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Generally disagree with what? The possibility that they would get whitewashed, or the idea they shouldn't gain access until they're good enough?


I think the first is a fairly irrelevant view, decide on the second and then worry about the first. Personally I'd have had them in a third lvl comp with all the bottom dwellers of the leagues. I liked the idea of those league clubs resting their best players, and so being able to lift their standards in the league, though, so not against the idea that T2 sides go straight into Challenge Cup, but that will be a higher level with smaller comps and I think a bit too much for them (not having followed any of their games/performances mind you).

Because I don't think that having the possibility of a team finishing outside the quarter finals to qualify automatically will be a good idea. I'd rather have a team finishing 5th in their domestic league.

fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen.


The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime.

46 Go to comments
J
JW 52 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

46 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

46 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search