Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I think radical action is needed': Ex-England international throws support behind RFU rule

(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

The RFU’s bombshell decision to introduce waist-high or below tackling into the amateur game has caused widespread backlash with over 65,000 participants signing a petition for a reversal.

ADVERTISEMENT

A number of high profile ex and current players and coaches have also come out in direct opposition or with concerns with the changes, including Ireland captain and coach Johnny Sexton and Andy Farrell.

But the RFU’s decision has found a supporter in former England international Ugo Monye, who backed the ‘radical’ move on the BBC Rugby Union weekly podcast with Sara Orchard, Chris Jones and Harlequins scrumhalf Danny Care.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I’m not surprised by the overwhelming emotion and amount of noise that has been created around it,” Monye told the panel.

“65,000 people have signed a petition to reverse this decision so far. I think it is the way the change was thrust upon the community and I think the way that was handled by the RFU paints quite a poor picture for the communications people working on this.

“It shouldn’t come out like that. I think the RFU absolutely understand that and if they don’t then you’ve only got to go onto Twitter and have a look at the complaints that have been lodged.”

Monye believed that there wasn’t enough data at the community level to assume that the professional game has a bigger concussion issue, stating that no return to play protocols could see concussed players back on the field too early.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There are gaps of truth in all of it,” he said.

“We’ve come to the conclusion that it is a bigger problem in the elite game than the community game. How? Can anyone prove that?

“You don’t take data from the community game on concussion. There will be more players returning back to playing prematurely from suspected concussions than the elite game.

“My point is around data, we have no data on the community game from level three and below.

“I’m in the minority here based on what I’ve seen online, I’m in favour of it.

“I totally understand the emotional response to it, I totally get it. There is so much more information that is needed to make this a success.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think you are absolutely right in calling it radical, but I think radical action is needed when we have issues in our game.

“If the number one priority for our game, whether it is governance or people who run the game is safety, then we need to have a safer game.

“People are stepping away from the game due to Covid and the habits which you’ve mentioned, but the noise for the last three years has been about concussion and finally I think we are doing something radical to hopefully change behaviour.”

England international and Harlequins scrumhalf Danny Care, who just made his 350th appearance for the club against the Sharks in the Champions Cup, who was willing to give the idea some thought but his personal view was it would lead to more concussions.

Care was concerned for tacklers with a low head position aiming for the waist area where knees and hips can create dangerous contact.

“It is a radical decision, like you say, a bolt from the blue, no one really could have called it and the reaction is massive,” Care said.

“We’ve even seen the England captain Ben Stokes tweet about it. When you get someone like him tweeting about it, it’s big news. It’s not just rugby news, it’s huge news.

“It’s massive for the game. I will counter this by saying, should we not just give it a bit of time?

“Obviously they are doing it for a reason. Is the reason right? My opinion is I feel you are going to have a lot more head injuries.

“I see the size of these lads running in and if you are making people have to tackle low, I don’t know the stats and won’t profess to know the stats, but you are going to see a lot more people getting concussed and knocked out which is the opposite of what we want in this game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
a
adam 699 days ago

"The noise for the last three years is around concussion" - that's because you've been making that noise, when commentating on the elite level. Almost no on on Saturday league rugby is talking about concussion. The noise has been about how everyone is struggling to get numbers out - and how can they?? All they hear is "concussion issue, safety issue, welfare concerns" rather than anyone enjoying or promoting playing Rugby!

You are justifying safety measures by literally saying you don't have any data on whether it is a problem. And once it is in place, we can't roll it back, because who would ever go along with "well, we did it for safety but actually we aren't as bothered about safety as we thought we were"

We are removing any physicality from a physical game and will end up with some touch rugby/netball hybrid.

c
christiaan 700 days ago

“I totally understand the emotional response to it"
It is not an emotional response by the fans, it is a response to the constant top down "we know better" attitude from WR.

N
Northandsouth 701 days ago

It would be easy enough to test whether lower tackles would cause more concussions: check what proportion of pro concussions related to waist or below tackles. My expectation would be 10-20% but would be happy to be proven wrong. I largely agree with Ugo: comms and engagement terrible, idea interesting. I have lots of English rugby tragic mates, banter about the footy all week every week for the 6N, picks for the WC, who are adamant they don't want their kids to play - and that's the people who adore the game the most.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
Another 7 hours ago
Razor's 2024 All Blacks Christmas wish list

"It seems like the idea of Ardie Savea moving to openside flanker is no longer on the table"


Says who? Savea was picked on the open side, with Wallace Sititi at 8, against France. It makes no difference to Savea’s game, whatsoever and allows Sititi to play in his preferred position. It also provides an option to bring in a third loose forward that may provide a better lineout option and a big body to compete with some of the big bodies found in other teams.


It was unfortunate that Finau was injured so early on against France before he had a chance to show how he might combine with Savea and Sititi, and there is still a possibility that Hoskins Sotutu might be effective alongside them too.


Don’t count out viable options.

28 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025? What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025?
Search