Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I think this looks like a deliberate snub': Scottish pundits miffed over Adam Hastings omission

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Scotland’s 39-man Six Nations squad named last week had fans and pundits alike baffled when head coach Gregor Townsend omitted Gloucester flyhalf Adam Hastings.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 25-year-old pivot had become a key contributor to Scotland over the last two Six Nations campaigns, firstly stepping up to guide the side as the starter when regular starter Finn Russell had a falling out with Townsend in 2020.

When Russell returned in 2021, Hastings assumed the role of bench cover for 10 and provided a crucial cameo in Paris when he set-up a last second try to Duhan van der Merwe to give Scotland a well earned away win over France.

Heading into the 2022 campaign, Townsend could not find room for Hastings in his 39-man squad which leaves Scotland with just one genuine 10 for the tournament.

Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland‘s rugby podcast this week, BCC Scotland’s chiefs sports writer Tom English was taken back by the omission and at a loss to find a reason for the non-selection.

“I’d have to say, some names I had to do some research on,” English told the BBC Radio Scotland panel.

“One name that wasn’t in the squad which really took me back, and that’s Adam Hastings. I can’t figure that out, why he’s not in there. It’s a really curious one.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Scotland now have one recognised flyhalf in the squad, I mean Kinghorn is in there as well, he’s played 10 for Edinburgh this season but he’s not a natural 10, in my book anyway. So you’ve got one.

“This is a 39-man squad and you’ve got one natural, out-and-out 10. I don’t understand that.”

Equally baffled was ex-Scotland international Peter Wright who couldn’t understand the rationale behind leaving out Hastings and heading into a Six Nations tournament with just one flyhalf.

“Why not make it a 40-man squad, has it got to be 39? So why not just make it 40 and include Hastings. I totally agree,” Wright said.

“You’ve got one out-and-out standoff. Against England I assume Kinghorn is going to cover 10 and probably wing and fullback, which is fine but if you lose Russell in the second or third minute and you putting a guy in that’s never been tested, if that’s how it goes.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Never been tested at international level. I don’t know the rationale, has he given rationale for it? Has he not picked him on form or not picked him because he just wants to look at other players?”

Podcast host Andy Burke confirmed that Townsend had indicated that the decision had been on form.

“Well he said during the week, Gregor Townsend, he said that players in that position are playing better, i.e. Blair Kinghorn, has played better at 10 for Edinburgh than Adam Hastings has for Gloucester,” Burke explained.

“Listen, Blair Kinghorn is a fine footballer, really, really good footballer,” English interjected passionately.

“But to put him in a Six Nations game at 10, if Finn Russell god forbid goes down injured in the first five minutes against England, Blair Kinghorn is your 10. I don’t think he’s ready to play that kind of game at 10.

“As for ‘he’s playing better than Hastings’, well, Kinghorn has played, I wouldn’t say disrespectfully the ‘fodder of the URC’, but he’s played some of lesser sides of the URC.

“He’s playing behind a pack that’s fairly dominant in games against the lower orders. The best performance they’ve put up this season was against Saracens and he didn’t play in that game.

“It’s curious. It’s very, very curious. Why take the risk? This is a guy who came off the bench regularly and had a fantastic Six Nations championship for Scotland and played very well.

“This is a guy who pitched in when Gregor Townsend and Finn Russell had their disagreement, played really really well throughout that Championship (in 2020). Adam Hastings has done exceptionally well for Scotland.”

Given the stature of Hastings’ performances over the last two years, English then questioned whether this was a deliberate move.

“I think this looks like a deliberate snub to him. It’s a 39-man squad and you can’t find a place for a guy who played all last season?”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search