Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I thought, who is going to argue with them two, so I picked them'

(Photo by Lionel Hahn/Getty Images)

France defence coach Shaun Edwards has explained the logic behind selecting the no-nonsense Paul Willemse and Romain Taofifenua as the pair of forwards responsible for laying down the law to their teammates when it comes to gain line physicality. Willemse, the 29-year-old lock from South Africa, has started all four matches so far this year for the Grand Slam-chasing French, scoring a try in their win over Scotland. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, the 31-year-old Taofifenua has appeared on three occasions off the 2022 bench to help bring the French victories home, the second row only missing last Friday’s match in Wales due to covid. 

Only England now stand in the way of France, who are seeking a first Six Nations Grand Slam since 2010, and defence coach Edwards has paid tribute to the bruising influence of a second row duo who set the tone for their pack’s level of physicality. 

Video Spacer

Jamie Noon guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Jamie Noon guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Asked on the latest episode of The Rugby Pod how true was it that Willemse isn’t allowed to go full bore at France training because he bangs up players too much, Edwards said: “We are a better defensive team when Paul is on the pitch. He is a very, very dominant character on the pitch. I gave him the job. 

“I asked him did he want the job to be in charge of the physicality at the advantage line, him and Romain Taofifenua, and they both accepted the job and have done a pretty good job so far in this competition. I thought to myself, who is going to argue with them two, so I picked them. Up there for thinking.” 

Related

Having forged his Test level reputation coaching Wales for more than a decade under Warren Gatland, Edwards switched to France in 2020 and has now brushed off the suggestion that his English accent was initially difficult for French players to understand.  

“What was it, 24-0 against England at half-time and that was my first game. I know you’ve said they struggled to understand my tactics but I think it was not too bad. They got a couple of tries in the second half – fair play to England, a top team, they had just come from the World Cup final but what was it, 23-0 or something like that at half-time.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked about Antoine Dupont, the World Rugby player of the year for 2021, Edwards added: “He is an amazing athlete. I have coached some fantastic No9s. Mike Phillips, so strong and big. Matt Dawson used to do judo, he was very, very strong in the tackle area and Rob Howley, I have coached so many really good No9s. 

“Eoin Reddan, so quick between the breakdowns, but Antoine is probably the best athlete in that position I have ever coached. He is just so explosive and so strong. So strong in the tackle and his support play is obviously superb because the pace that he has is undoubted. He is electrically quick.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search