Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I want it in writing': NZR under pressure to offer guarantee

(Photo by Daniel Carson / Photosport NZ)

Rugby Australia CEO Andy Marinos says he’s asked NZR to guarantee in writing that the Perth test between the All Blacks and Wallabies will be played, according to a report by the Sydney Morning Herald.

ADVERTISEMENT

The stakes are high for Rugby Australia, who would be forced to return an incentive payment from the Western Australian Government if the game does not go ahead. The WA Government put down A$5mil to stage the game at Optus Stadium in Perth, where 60,000 tickets were sold to fans wanting to watching the final Bledisloe test.

Rugby Australia’s boss has asked for a written guarantee from NZR the game will be played, and Marinos was confident of securing that ‘pretty soon’.

Video Spacer

What sacrifice means to the Black Ferns | Healthspan Elite

Video Spacer

What sacrifice means to the Black Ferns | Healthspan Elite

“I want it in writing. We have an email, but we need a letter for both the government and the stadium as well,” Marinos told SMH.

“That should be forthcoming pretty soon.”

After the All Blacks abandoned flights to Perth, Rugby Championship plans were put in limbo as both the Springboks and Pumas plans were put on hold. The two teams were due to board a charter flight from South Africa after their second game on the weekend.

Despite rumours the competition could be relocated to Europe, Rugby Australia is pushing for the Championship to be held in Queensland. Marinos has said that they are seeking fast-tracked approvals from the Queensland Government to get the teams into the country for managed isolation.

Venues are already being secured in Queensland, despite the NRL also using the state, there should be no clashes with scheduling.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Queensland is absolutely a priority for us. Until such time that we cannot make it work, that’s the priority,” Marinos said.

“There was never any doubt about whether we could play there. It was just doubt that we could get South Africa and Argentina through managed isolation.”

That approval will come from the Queensland Government by Monday afternoon Marinos said, which would then put pressure on the NZR to get the All Blacks into Australia who said they delayed their travel due to uncertainty around the schedule.

If the All Blacks avoid travelling to Australia a second time around, then Rugby Australia would explore all legal options to recoup the money that would be forfeited to the WA Government from NZR.

“I’ve made New Zealand very aware that we have a contract and they’ve made a commitment.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 6 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 10 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search