Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I was p****d off': O'Mahony on calling out 'scumbag' Lavanini

Dublin , Ireland - 21 November 2021; Peter (Photo by Harry Murphy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Ireland back row Peter O’Mahony has spoken about his furious on-pitch reaction to the reckless tackle that resulted in Argentina lock Tomas Lavanini getting red carded in Dublin with 20 minutes remaining in Sunday’s Autumn Nations Series match. Andy Farrell’s team recorded a comfortable 53-7, seven-tries-to-one win at the Aviva Stadium, but a sour taste was left in the mouth due to the needless breakdown assault that took place on Irish replacement Cian Healy.

ADVERTISEMENT

O’Mahony, who was also contesting the breakdown, was livid with what he had seen and he immediately accused the Pumas player of “scumbag stuff”, a remark that was audible via the reflink that media and fans were tuned into at the stadium as the situation unfolded. 

Before he reviewed the incident with his TMO, referee Matthew Carley had to take O’Mahony aside and reprimand him for his language, that he needed to be better given that he was now captaining Ireland after James Ryan had groggily exited the action shortly before half-time. 

Video Spacer

Bryan Habana guests on RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Bryan Habana guests on RugbyPass Offload

After reviewing the footage, Carley gave Lavanini his marching orders and Ireland went on to reap reward, scoring 19 unanswered points in the closing stages to see out their win. Post-game, O’Mahony was asked to revisit his fiery reaction and to explain exactly why he had reacted like that. 

“It is heat of the moment stuff,” said the 2017 first Test Lions skipper, who started 2021 knowing what it was like to take the long, lonely walk to the sideline as he was red-carded in Ireland’s Six Nations defeat to Wales. “I have been on the other side of that to be fair. It’s split-second decision-making from his [Lavanini’s] point of view. There’s enough to be said. I have been on the other side of it.”

The subject didn’t rest there, though, as it was revisited later in the media briefing with another question. “I have spoken already. These things happen. It is split-second stuff from him. He is trying to clear someone out but he has got it wrong from what I thought at the time and you are trying to look after your buddies and the last thing you want to see is them injured. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“From his point of view, it is tough. It is literally fractions of seconds. At the time I was p****d off but I have been on the other side of it. You are talking about hundredths of seconds where pictures change and it’s a red card. The disappointment of getting a red card for your country is nothing that people can experience, so I wouldn’t wish that on anyone.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
i
isaac 1125 days ago

Yet no ban....fiji get one red card and same time 5 match ban.
.equality ..
Lol

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search