Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'It was very clear cut': Ian Foster backs controversial call in Bledisloe clash

(Photo by Morgan Hancock/Getty Images)

The two opposing coaches from Thursday night’s Bledisloe Cup encounter in Melbourne unsurprisingly shared different views of referee Mathie Raynal’s controversial decision in the dying moments of the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

With time almost up and the clock and the Wallabies ahead by three, Raynal punished the Wallabies for wasting time after earning a penalty inside their 22, handing a scrum to the All Blacks. Jordie Barrett scored from the set-piece and the All Blacks grabbed a 39-37 victory to a chorus of boos from the naturally partisan crowd.

Speaking to media following the match, Australia coach Dave Rennie said it was a less than satisfactory way to finish what had been a thrilling Test match up to that point – even if it was, to the letter of the law, the correct decision.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I haven’t seen a decision like that at any level,” he said. “The rule book’s complex, isn’t it? There’s surely something in there somewhere (but) that is never reffed upon.”

“It’s incredibly disappointing way to finish because down 31-13, down to 13 players, showed a huge amount of character to come back into that game and then get our nose in front. So to lose it, in that fashion, massively disappointing.”

All Blacks coach Ian Foster felt that the Wallabies should have no qualms with the call, given that Raynal repeatedly urged the Australian side to stop wasting time.

“I thought it was very clear cut,” Foster said.

“They were delaying the kick. He said time off. He warned him then he said time off and then he said to speed up then he said time on. Then he asked him twice to kick it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I understand there is a contentious nature about it but it was very clear cut from the opposition.”

Foster also suggested that the Wallabies got away with some hijinks when flyhalf Bernard Foley quickly kicked a conversion following a try to Andrew Kellaway which Foster believed was set to be assessed by the TMO:

“The other one that wasn’t clear cut was when Kellaway scored and the TMO wanted to look at what was a very suspicious forward pass and yet the conversion was allowed to be taken.”

Related

All Blacks stand-in captain Sam Whitelock admitted he understood the Wallabies’ frustrations with the call.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I haven’t had that happen to me in a game whether for or against the side I’m playing for,” he said.

“You’ve got to make sure you’ve got a good plan to close out the game whether you’re up by one point or by more.

“Slips [Wallabies captain James Slipper] and I have known each other for a long time and he said ‘Look, we’ve just got to be better than that’, and he’s spot on.

“It’s something that I know that they will review and look at it and they’ll make sure that it doesn’t happen again.”

The win in Melbourne ensures the All Blacks will hold onto the Bledisloe Cup for another season and now find themselves in a strong position to claim the Rugby Championship title when they take on the Wallabies at Eden Park next weekend in the final round of action. They now sit five points ahead of the Springboks and Pumas on the overall ladder, although those two sides each boast a game in hand.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
f
faatali 828 days ago

Ian Foster does not have any complain due to the fact that the Ref help him retain his job...HATS off to the Wallabies seems like the All Blacks wanna play touch rugby...lol..All Blacks time is over and will again fail to live up to the standards set by the greats..

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 828 days ago

Robbery of a finale, the ref wanted to be an absurd authoritarian and hoist the trophy himself. Feel sorry for the players out on their feet who did enough to win only to be robbed by Raynal la ruine.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search