Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Wasn’t a red’: Ian Foster explains the ‘facts’ of Scott Barrett’s send off

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Lock Scott Barrett may have been sent off against the Springboks on Friday night, but coach Ian Foster has explained how “it wasn’t a red” ahead of any potential judiciary decisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

With a sense of uncertainty surrounding Barrett going into next month’s Rugby World Cup opener against France, coach Foster has attempted to clarify the situation.

Playing against the Springboks at Twickenham, Barrett ultimately paid the price for the All Blacks’ tough start. New Zealand gave away a staggering number of penalties, and eventually, referee Matthew Carley had enough.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Barrett was sent to the sideline for 10 minutes after an infringement, and the second rower was joined by captain Sam Cane shortly after. The All Blacks’ poor discipline wasn’t helping their cause.

The world champion Springboks took a 14-nil lead, and with the half-time break rapidly approaching, they appeared to be sailing through smooth waters.

But, from an All Blacks perspective, the worst was yet to come.

Referee Carley and the TMO reviewed an act of foul play which involved Barrett, and agreed that the incident warranted at least another yellow.

Points Flow Chart

South Africa win +28
Time in lead
0
Mins in lead
64
0%
% Of Game In Lead
80%
67%
Possession Last 10 min
33%
7
Points Last 10 min
0

Barrett was sent to the sin bin for a second time, which also went under review for a straight red card. But two yellows made a red anyway, so Barrett’s night was over.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The facts are he got a yellow card, the first yellow card was not for foul play. The second yellow card was a yellow card, so it wasn’t a red card,” coach Foster explained on Saturday.

“The judiciary, fortunately, don’t judge people on the reaction of people on the opposition, they judge it on the facts.”

Scott Barrett etched his name into All Blacks history on Friday, and not for the right reasons, after becoming the first player ever to receive two red cards at Test level.

Barrett was sent off four years ago against Australia in Perth – mirroring this in the sense that this incident was also in the leadup to rugby’s showpiece event.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They always feel gutted because they want to give their best and Scott’s at the top of the tree when it comes to that,” Foster added.

“I think he’s fine. We just go back into process mode now, try and take the emotion out of it, because there’s a lot happening in that first half.

“There’s a lot of emotion in the shed afterwards but we’ve just got to calm down and say, ‘We’ll, that’s World Cups.’ So really, if you’re looking for a dress rehearsal, that’s perfect.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

32 Comments
J
Jonathan 480 days ago

Based on many precedents, Barret is lucky for no further sanctioning. He tucked his arm in and braced his shoulder (showing clear intent) - this approach has been deemed illegal - a cheap shot and a yellow card offense. Then he strikes Marx on the neck area and slips upwards. Contact with neck makes it red. The contact point was nowhere close to the ball.

The criticism that Marx received for so-called milking the card is very unfair. Players appeal to refs ALL THE TIME for knock ons, penalties and etc. Marx (probably one of the toughest in the sport and clearly feeling the impact of the cheap shot) while holding his head momentarily, merely appealed to his captain (not the ref) to query Barret's clean-out, which he is entirely entitled to do.

The only way I can get my head around this only being a double-yellow is if there's consistency with this interpretation throughout the RWC and beyond. (but we all know how this goes... )

B
Bob Marler 481 days ago

It’s bizarre that the refs and TMO are somehow in the wrong for sending off players for foul play. Barret cost his team the game. Finished and klaar.

B
Bob Marler 481 days ago

I reckon there’s another record loss coming. 8 September.

T
Tony 481 days ago

I think Barrett has a case to answer, these are the type of things we want out of the game. A 2 match ban would not be out of order, but being NZ ref will probably get told off for the Yellow! 😇

J
Julian 481 days ago

He got a "team" yellow, and that's bad luck. Second one was dirty, with intend, but no head contact. Overall, as a Saffer, I hope he gets off with a warning. We want to see 15 vs 15, but a player on yellow should also be more careful. But, I would hate to see a Barret, Etzebeth, etc play the game with no passion. Good luck Scott.

D
Derek 482 days ago

Right on the money Ian Foster. That loss might just be better than if we had beaten them, in the long run. AND you know what they say about a poor dress rehearsal. I just hope the injury to Lomax isn't too bad.

D
Damian 482 days ago

True that Fozzy. Just can't take high penalty count in to the knock outs. Still think Sam W should be co-captain. We will be ready for RSA now. No worries.

D
DR 483 days ago

Semantics. The article shows a photo of the referee holding up a red card.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search