1
Ian Foster explains why Scott Barrett has been picked at No 6
By Ben Smith
Crusaders lock Scott Barrett has been named at No 6 for the All Blacks for the first time since the 2019 semi-final defeat to England as they prepare to face Ireland in the first test.
ADVERTISEMENT
The All Blacks options at blindside were rather thin in the squad, with one specialist at the position in Akira Ioane and versatile options like Pita Gus Sowakula and Tupou Vaa’i who cover another back row position.
The selection of Barrett was a bold move by Foster which will bolster the line out to combat a handful of tall Irish targets like Caelen Doris and Jack Conan in the loose forwards.
Video Player is loading.
Defending his selection, Foster said that he knows Barrett can play there and is bringing some of his best form into this test series after a successful Super Rugby Pacific campaign with the Crusaders.
“[It’s the] first time he’s started for us there, but he’s filled in a couple of times there,” Foster said.
“He’s also played for the Crusaders there. We know that he can do it.
“He’s one of the form players in Super Rugby in the last four to six weeks. He’s on top of his game.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Barrett’s stint at No 6 against England in the fateful semi-final didn’t play out the way the coaches had planned as the All Black lineout couldn’t stop England on the night, leading to an early substitution for the Crusaders’ captain.
Foster explained that the lessons from that game have been taken on board and he didn’t dwell too long on the call to play Barrett at blindside once again.
The All Blacks head coach believed the positives outweigh the risks with Barrett bringing some of the best ball carrying in the country to the table.
“I didn’t spend too long thinking about the 2019 game,” he said.
“But we took some lessons from that, they were learned a long time ago.
“This one, we’re very clear about the strategy. It’s something we’ve talked to Scott about this possibility.
ADVERTISEMENT
“If we look at the positives of it, apart from his set piece acumen – we know how good he is in that space – he’s also bringing a bruising defence and ball-carrying part to his game now.
“He’s probably our most dynamic lock ball carrier at the moment. We can utilise that at No.6.
“So there’s some things that even if you sit down with Scott and talk to him about it, he finds a lot of the roles very similar now, except for a couple of defensive tweaks that we’ve had to make sure we tidy up.”
Scott barrett at blindside appears to be the main talking point around NZ, personally I reckon Sam cane 7 is "headline news" as greater player/leader as he is, Papalii has outperformed him in every possible aspect. In light of this, I also understand the logic behind having Scott barrett at 6 (even though I personally wouldve chosen Tupou vai) as either of the two are big ball carriers, offer sound defence, high work rate and line out superiority. As much as I love Akira, hes too "hot n cold" and tends to go on "vacation" during a game. Frizzell has only just got back from injury (otherwise id start him at 6) I understand NZ being nervous about this selection choice as things went "pear shaped" at the world cup. Honestly with Sam cane starting at 7, that has me more concerned than anything
Good to see Scott Barret picked at No. 6. We need a tight-loose beast there and a genuine line-out option. The International bench-marks are Pieter-Steph du Toit (2m, 120 kgs) and Courtney Lawes (2.03 115kgs), so if Barrett (1.97 111 kgs) doesn’t cut the mustard - and he should be given at least the Irish series to adjust - Tupou Vai’i (1.98 118kgs) should be next cab off the rank.
Akira Ioane has the bulk for ball carrying but isn’t a genuine line out option and doesn’t have the work-rate. Cullen Grace has great work-rate but at 1.93 and 107kgs simply isn’t big enough for an international No. 6. Note that when Clayton McMillan was asked straight after the Maori game by the Grace fan-boys at Sky for his opinion on how Grace went, McMillan talked instead about the huge contribution of Cam Suafoa (1.96 116 kgs).
Barrett is a good deal heavier than 111 kgs. Don't believe what you read on the ABs web site. When he first appeared in the ABs he was near that weight, with Hansen at the time stating clearly that 120kgs was required for a test lock and that Barrett, while not there at that stage, was well on his way and would be at that weight soon. The Crusaders have him at 118kgs, and it wouldn't surprise me if he is a couple heavier than that at the business end of the season.
The published weight stats are not worth the paper (screen) they are printed on. Why would you publish the right number where your opponents can read it?
All Blacks don't want to fall in the trap of playing the same game as their NH and South African counterparts - we certainly need to beat them up front but traditionally our success has stemmed from exploiting wider channels with our ball runners on the back of this. Is Savea going to play this role? Taylor? Cane and Barrett can't and shouldn't. All Blacks are proudly an innovative team as well so I'm cautious about this move.
Scott Barrett has also played 99% of his rugby as a lock but time will tell and I hope it succeeds. Vaai seems like a good long term option too and I wouldn't be so quick to rule out Cullen Grace. Hopefully, this motivates Akira to improve his work rate too. Good depth in NZ when you really think about it.