Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ian Foster leaps to All Blacks captain Sam Cane's defence after World Cup final red

By PA
Sam Cane/ PA

New Zealand captain Sam Cane admitted he was feeling “so much hurt” after he was sent off in Saturday’s 12-11 World Cup final defeat by South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cane’s yellow card for a dangerous tackle on Jesse Kriel in the 28th minute of a dramatic clash at the Stade de France was upgraded to red by the bunker review system.

It was the first time a player had been dismissed in a men’s World Cup final and although the All Blacks showed heart to overcome the setback and score through Beauden Barrett, they could not pierce South Africa’s defence again.

Video Spacer

New Zealand post-match presser – World Cup Final

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      New Zealand post-match presser – World Cup Final

      “So much hurt right now. It’s actually hard to find the words to explain it,” Cane said.

      “It’s hard because you are feeling so much hurt, but at the same time you are so proud of the group in how they fought back.

      Related

      “We really gave ourselves a good shot of winning that game. I think it speaks volumes of the group as a whole.”

      A despondent Cane refused to blame the officials led by referee Wayne Barnes or the bunker review system for a decision that left New Zealand swimming against the tide.

      “At the time, I wasn’t even aware (of the head contact). It sort of caught me off guard because of the fact he stepped back,” Cane said.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “But we’ve been at this tournament for two months now and anything around the head has ramifications.

      “I’m not here to discuss whether it was right or wrong. It can’t be changed. It’s something unfortunately I am going to have to live with forever.”

      New Zealand head coach Ian Foster stood by his skipper and insisted the high tackle was not a red card offence, adding that Siya Kolisi’s challenge on Ardie Savea in the second half that was a yellow only was equally severe.

      “We’ve all seen the way Sam has contributed to the game, to our team behind the scenes, and it’s fantastic,” Foster said.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “He’s worthy of being captain of the All Blacks, which is an honour and a privilege, and he has carried that magnificently. I’m incredibly proud of him and proud to coach him.

      “There was an intent to wrap and there didn’t seem to be a whole lot of force in the contact.

      “The hit on Ardie had a lot of force going into that contact and had a direct contact on the head. The game has got a few issues it has got to sort out. That’s not sour grapes.

      Related

      “You’ve got two different situations with different variables and one is a red card, one is a yellow card. That’s the game.

      “We got the same behaviour from that TMO (Tom Foley) that we got during the Irish series last year. The same TMO. We expected what we got.”

      South Africa defended their crown through four Handre Pollard penalties, all of them coming in the first half, to win a third successive knock-out game by a single point.

      It lifts them above New Zealand as the most successful side in World Cup history with four titles.

      “There aren’t a lot of things going right in our country and we have the privilege to be able to do what we love and inspire people in life, not just sports people,” Kolisi said.

      “Where I come from, I couldn’t dream I could be here today. We come from different walks of life. I had my own goals and ambitions.

      “I want to look after my family, I want to give back to my community. You need to come and see South Africa to understand.

      “When we come together nothing can stop us, not just in sport but also in life.”

      ADVERTISEMENT

      O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 5 | Making Waves

      Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

      Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

      Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

      Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

      Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

      Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

      Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      20 Comments
      S
      Steven 545 days ago

      Congratulations to South Africa on going back to back and being first to 4... however I'm not going to overlook the elephant in the room.
       
      I guess it was inevitable that the final of Rugby's showpiece tournament would be ruined and decided by the excessive head contact rules that have come into use in the last 4 years, and their subjective interpretation, which have already ruined a number of games for the fans.
       
      Administrators can try to justify them on the basis of player safety and PC press (who are afraid of being osttracised by the establishment) can go along with them, but the Emperor has no clothes.
       
      I believe the current situation is untenable and has to change. Rugby is a contact sport and the majority of head contacts that are currently being penalised with yellow and red cards are accidental and just an inevitable part of the playing the game, and, as such, will not become less frequent over time as a result of cards being handed out. Therefore If the purpose of handing out cards to discourage future infringements and avoid concussion law suits it's not working, and if you come back in 100 years time you will still be seeing the same types of accidental head contact incidents that occurred In this final (and other games over the last 4 years),
       
      It will not be effective as a defense against any concussion class action that may be brought, because the majority of concussions in rugby fall outside of the curent head contact punishment rules anyway, and will continue to occur. Tacklers will continue to get concussed when their heads accidentaly come into contact with the ball carriers hip or shoulder, or when two tacklers coming from opposite sides of the ball carrier end up having a head clash, or when a player hits his head on the ground during a tackle etc. Also ball carriers very rarely punished for using their elbows to fend off tacklers, and, in fact, there appears to have been an example of this in the final which was not picked up.
       
      One day there will have to be a rethink, but in the mean time games and tournaments are being ruined, or decided arbitrarily, by the subjectivity of the officials, for no useful purpose. (Note I'm not blaming the individual officials themselves, but the administrators who are issueing them with the instructions on how to interpret the rules)
       
       
      Under the current rules Siya Kolisi should have got a red card, even though we know that no-one deliberately clashes heads with another player
      However the subjective decision of the TMO was only to give him a yellow. In my view Savea is standing relatively upright, not crouched, so there is no mitigating factor. Kolisi's body position is irrelevant and so not mitigating. However if we must go there, then Kolisi initiated direct head contact and in my opinion only Savea's body position can be a mitigating factor. The fact that Kolisi is bent over and drives up is in no way mitigating, red card.
      (But if I was running things it would not even have been a yellow)
       
       
      Under the current rules Sam Cane gets a yellow card, which was later subjectively upgraded to red
      In my view Jesse Kriel is crouching, in order to lower his centre of gravity as he drives into contact, which is a mitigating factor. 
      Cane is standing in the normal position for a tackler, with legs slightly bent, and wraps his arms, so not reckless, and the ruling should have remained a yellow
      (However if I was running things it would not even have been a yellow)

      T
      Turlough 546 days ago

      I don’t want to be hard, but Cane and only Cane is responsible for that red. He had every chance to lower the force or attempt to hinge but he didn’t. It is a poor tackle. As captain he cannot tackle like that. He has likely cost the team the world cup. He shouldn’t be demozid at all. It’s a split second in a game. But it ain’t Barnes fault, it ain’t the TMOs. He has only himself to blame there.

      T
      Turlough 546 days ago

      This is nonsense from Foster. The Bunker system not Tom Foley decides the fate of Players reviewed. He appears to be making a personal attack on Tom Foley here:

      “We got the same behaviour from that TMO (Tom Foley) that we got during the Irish series last year. The same TMO. We expected what we got.”

      Not only has the bunker decision got nothing to do with Tom Foley but he seems to blaming Ireland’s series win on Tom Foley!!!
      This is also the third time during this world cup he has referenced the cards in the NZ-Irish Test series. Its clear the motive now: he was having a go at Tom Foley.

      This is lame stuff: there was clearly a great deal of sour grapes in New Zealand over the series lost to Ireland but it seems that much of it was emanating from Foster himself. You cannot keep blaming TMOs for your losses. The two most monumental losses in the last 4 years for NZ have been the Irish test series and the World Cup Final. He was coach for both and he is blaming Tom Foley for both!

      D
      Driss 547 days ago

      This World Cup , the worst in the history ruined by the clowns referees and TMO.
      We have talking more about referees than about the game , there is a reason .
      World rugby is desatreous institution.
      New Zealand must boycott their competition.
      But stop with Cane now . Foster and Cane will go together.
      Cane is the symbol captain of the worst coach in the history and the worst all blacks team.
      Razor will build the all blacks machine with his proper men and new generation youngers.

      Load More Comments

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      c
      charles Phoenix 37 minutes ago
      Don't get out over your skis on the Highlanders

      I found myself stuck in a cycle that had no end to it,I knew I needed to break out of that matrix or watch all I have ever worked for go down the drain all for nothing . The setbacks & mountainous taxes I faced in the later stages of my investment while trying to withdraw my assets, I vividly recall experiencing none of that in the earlier rounds when I started investing.Despite being faced with these abrupt taxes which I willingly paid hoping that my withdrawal process will be approved.Withdrawing my trading gains turned from a walk in the park to nothing but a disappointing & frustrating experience filled with unending commission and denied withdrawals altogether.This could have gone on until I was bankrupt or worse homeless in the streets, it breaks my heart When I remember how lost & broken I felt upon discovering the investment company was fraudulent because I always thought I knew better & not the type to fall victim to such. Finding yourself in such situation and not knowing what to do or where to begin your search for a solution to get your invested asset out is an experience and a feeling that not just anyone understands,”it’s like a been there done that kind of situation”, drowning in your own pool of regrets & self blame while battling the thoughts of the possible loss of your whole investment . I Searched high & low and left no stone unturned in my quest for assistance,I faced countless disappointment from firms & institution I thought I could rely on, not to mention the discouragements from friends & family who wanted me to give up on my search and consider damage control, instead of trying to recover what I lost as it was clearly costing me more & taking it’s toll on my overall wellbeing, but of course I paid no attention to the negative comments.

      And it’s not until I tried and tried and tried again did my search lead me to “VALOR HACK RECOVERY TEAM”. Valor Team handled my request & complaint with ease and ethics that I have never seen before in my life , after “VALOR TEAM’S” interception in my case my idea of possibilities heightened. My newly found awareness towards Investments & “Investment Frauds” gave me the push to share my experience in an attempt to help the next victim who is probably going through the same emotional rollercoaster of uncertainty and failed expectation from sources they trusted ,to search no further but head straight to a Renowned & Legit asset recovery company “VALOR HACK RECOVERY TEAM” , because this team in question worked round the clock to ensure my invested asset were pulled from the fraudulent investment company. It became clear to me after getting scammed that it’s no news anymore to loose money through an investment scam ,it has become a widespread problem that’s eating deep into the savings account of my fellow Americans and the world at large and it’s high time we fight fire with fire. Fighting Fraud, Fraud prevention, detection & Asset recovery works better when everyone that has ever come in contact with “Valor team” and can attest to the company’s authenticity(who ) also understands how this team works, to go Public make & it an obligation to educate your family, team, anyone & everyone within your reach (the next victim or the world in general) to use a trusted Asset Recovery Solution like “VALOR HACK RECOVERY TEAM”  to identify problems/foul play in any investment or business deal they wish to venture in to. Delegate tasks like this to the right experts - VALOR HACK TEAM- they can detect & deal with any red flags raised by the investment company that you are already investing with or about to invest in, with their expert insight in fraud detection system.

       Below are the means of contact that I’m aware of ;

      Email: Valorhaq at gmail dotcom

      • ⁃ Telegram: Valorhaq_HQ

      5 Go to comments
      f
      fl 52 minutes ago
      Japan's proposed anti-diverse 'blood' eligibility law after foreign player influx

      “WR are saying you’re not Japanese until you’ve had 5 years there and JRFU are saying you can be after 30 tests”

      Yes I am aware of this. Most people will never play 30 tests, so for those that don’t the JRFU will define their nationality according to “blood”.


      “The Drua are identical to Moana.”

      And Fijian Drua are not the same as “Fiji”.


      “Of course you can. You just can’t make it represent a whole country ala South Africa. I’m sure theres hundres of Scottish or Irish rep teams all over.”

      Name literally one team that restricts selection to only white people. If any exist, I would say that that is bad, because I am not racist. But I don’t believe you’ll be able to name one.


      “At least you got one thing right, a person can call themselves white if they want, or Maori, and be involved in any such like minded group. Just don’t be like the KKK and make it a racial group 😋”

      Are you aware that ability to play for NZ Maori is determined according to racial heritage? And that the same will be true of players deemed “Japanese” under the new JRFU eligibility rules?


      “While I’m sure you realise you’re wrong about about the picture you tried to paint (and probably new before posting) in your OP”

      I’m not wrong. Racism is bad.


      “I don’t have faith that you were able to corelate the two examples”

      This doesn’t make sense. “Correlate” doesn’t mean what you seem to think it means. Its also not clear what examples you’re referring to; is it the JRFU and Moana? The JRFU and NZ Maori? The Maori and hypothetical whites only teams?


      “Happy to keep replying until you do, again”

      Again? When has this happened before?

      30 Go to comments
      TRENDING
      TRENDING 'Are there 3 better fly-halves in Britain and Ireland... I don’t think so' 'Are there 3 better fly-halves in Britain and Ireland?'
      Search